Comparsion of Soil Microbiology Characteristics in Five Subtropical Ecosystems
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Landscape Architecture,Hunan Polytechnic of Environment and Biology

Clc Number:

S154.36

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the soil microbiology characters of subtropical ecosystem, the soil microbial physio-chemical properties were studied in five ecosystems, such as barren grassland (BG), Cunninghamia lanceolata forest (CL), Cinnamomum camphora forest (CC), Cunninghamia lanceolata-Cinnamomum camphora mixed forest (CL-CC) and nature recovery (NR). The results showed that soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus (SMBC, SMBN and SMBP) and soil basal respiration (SBR) in CC, CL-CC and NR were significantly higher than those in BG and CL (P<0.05) at 0-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm soil layers, whereas metabolic quotient (qCO2) in CC, CL-CC and NR was significantly lower than that in BG and CL (P<0.05). SMBC, SMBN, SMBP and SBR significantly decreased with increment of soil depth (P<0.05), while qCO2 significantly increased in all ecosystems (P<0.05). Soil bulk density (SBD) had significantly negative correlation with SMBC, SMBN, SMBP, and SBR (P<0.05), significantly positive correlation with qCO2 (P<0.05). SMBC, SMBN, SMBP, SBR had significantly positive correlation with soil total porosity (STP), soil water stable macro-aggregate (SWSM), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), and available phosphorus (AP) (P<0.01), and qCO2 had significant negative correlation with STP, SWSM, SOC, TN, AN, AP (P<0.05). Therefore, NR, CC and CL-CC could significantly improve soil quality, but BG and CL had not obvious amelioration to soil quality.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

范适,杨宁.亚热带5个生态系统土壤微生物学性质比较[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2016,24(6):635~641

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:January 19,2016
  • Revised:June 20,2016
  • Adopted:July 04,2016
  • Online: November 15,2016
  • Published: