Effects of Selective Cutting Intensities on Niche of Six Dominant Species Populations on Arbor Layer in Natural Secondary Forest
Author:
Affiliation:

Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fujian Jian'ou Furen Forestry Co.,Ltd.,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the effects of cutting intensity on niche of tree dominant species in natural secondary forest, the niche breadth, niche similarity proportion and niche overlap of 6 dominant species, such as Pinus massoniana, Schima superba, Daphnipyllum oldhamii, Castanopsis carlesii, C. eyrei and Adinandra millettii, under different selective cutting intensities were studied by quantitative investigation method. The results showed that the niche breadth of dominant species decreased with increment of selective cutting intensity, which were more than 0.5 except of Adinandra millettii. The species proportion of niche overlap above 0.8 also decreased with increment of selective cutting intensity. Under clear cutting, niche breadth of dominant species were less than 0.5, and species proportion of niche overlap above 0.8 only occupied 46.7%. It suggested that low and middle selective cutting intensity were helpful to keep wide niche breadth and ecological adaptability of dominant species. Therefore, rational selective cutting was beneficial to protect and utilization the mid-subtropical natural secondary forest, and favorite intensity was low or middle selective cutting intensities.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

巫志龙,陈金太,周新年,胡喜生,周成军,陈辉荣.择伐强度对天然次生林乔木层6种优势种群生态位的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2013,21(2):161~167

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:May 28,2012
  • Revised:May 28,2012
  • Adopted:October 19,2012
  • Online: April 03,2013
  • Published: