Niche and Interspecific Association of Spontaneous Herbaceous Plants in Fuzhou Section of Minjiang River
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [38]
  • |
  • Related [16]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the function, composition and succession trend of autoherbous community in Fuzhou section of the Minjiang River, the ecological niche, interspecific association and community stability of autoherbous communities were studied by using niche determination, variance ratio (VR), χ2 test, association coefficient (AC), Spearman rank correlation test and M. Godron stability methods. The results showed that niche similarity and niche overlap index of dominant species in autoherbous communities were generally low, and inter-specific competition was not intense. Most of the species with large importance value and niche width were invasive plants, which were easy to threaten native plants. The dominant species in the community showed no significant positive association on the whole. The results ofχ2 test, association coefficient, and Spearman rank correlation showed that the positive association was not obvious, indicating that the interspecific association and stability of the dominant species in the community were weak, and each species tended to distribute independently. The results of M. Godron analysis showed that the community was currently in an unstable state. Due to the harsh conditions along urban river, flooding interference and human disturbance, the autoherbous community was unstable and still in the early stage of succession.

    Reference
    [1] CAPON S J, PETTIT N E. Turquoise is the new green: Restoring and enhancing riparian function in the Anthropocene [J]. Ecol Manag Restor, 2018, 19(S1): 44-53. doi: 10.1111/emr.12326.
    [2] KUGLEROVÁ L, KIELSTRA B W, MOORE R D, et al. Importance of scale, land-use, and stream network properties for riparian plant com-munities along an urban gradient [J]. Freshw Biol, 2019, 64(3): 587-600. doi:10.1111/fwb.13244.
    [3] GUO E H, YANG X T, CHEN L D. Research of resident’s perceptions to ecological functions of riparian buffers and their preferences for river landscape [J]. Chin Landscape Archit, 2017, 33(1): 95-99. [郭二辉, 杨喜田, 陈利顶. 河岸带生态功能认知及河流景观偏好的调查研究[J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(1): 95-99.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664. 2017.01.019.]
    [4] HE T, SUN Z G, LI J B, et al. Spatial distributions of total sulfur contents in plant-soil systems of the typical marshes with different flooding regimes in the Min River estuary [J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2016, 30(5): 246-254. [何涛, 孙志高, 李家兵, 等. 闽江河口不同淹水环境下典型湿地植物-土壤系统全硫含量空间分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(5): 246-254. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.05.041.]
    [5] ROUSSET O, LEPART J. Positive and negative interactions at diffe-rent life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis) [J]. J Ecol, 2000, 88(3): 401-412. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00457.x.
    [6] ZHANG L N, ZHU G Q, YANG K, et al. Niche and interspecific association of main woody plants in Myrica nana shrubland in central Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(11): 1400-1410. [张零念, 朱贵青, 杨宽, 等. 滇中云南杨梅灌丛主要木本植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1400-1410. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0305.]
    [7] JIANG H, ZHANG H, LONG W X, et al. Interspecific associations and niche characteristics of communities invaded by Decalobanthus boisianus [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(4): 388-399. [江焕, 张辉, 龙文兴, 等. 金钟藤入侵群落的种间联结及生态位特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4): 388-399. doi: 10.17520/biods.2019007.]
    [8] RUAN P Z, WANG B, ZHONG Y Q, et al. Interspecific association and community stability analysis of dominant trees and shrubs in the concomitant community of Camellia flavida Hung T. Chang [J]. Plant Sci J, 2024, 42(2):170-180. [阮枰臻, 王斌, 钟艺倩, 等. 淡黄金花茶伴生群落优势乔灌木的种间联结及群落稳定性分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2024, 42(2):170-180. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.23147.]
    [9] YOU Q, SHANG N, DAI W Y, et al. Interspecific associations and soil factors of volunteer plants in urban vacant land: A case study of Zhengzhou Beilonghu Park [J]. J NW For Univ, 2023, 38(5): 270-278. [尤其, 商妞, 代挽玉, 等. 城市闲置地自生植物种间联结及土壤因子分析——以郑州北龙湖公园为例[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(5): 270-278. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2023.05.35.]
    [10] WANG M, WANG H B. Distribution pattern of spontaneous species and influencing factors in three landuse types of Shanghai [J]. J NW For Univ, 2021, 36(6): 266-273. [王沫, 王红兵. 上海3种用地类型的自生植物分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(6): 266-273. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2021.06.38.]
    [11] LI Y H, DING Y F, ZHANG C W. Niche and interspecific association of dominant herbaceous plants in the outer Qinhuai River, Nanjing City [J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci), 2023, 47(6): 203-210. [李雨晗, 丁彦芬, 张畅为. 南京外秦淮河优势草本植物生态位和种间联结性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6): 203-210. doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206025.]
    [12] PANG M Z. Cause of flood in Min River and protective measure of living things research [J]. E China For Manag, 2003, 17(2): 35-39. [庞闽志. 闽江水灾成因与生物防治措施研究[J]. 华东森林经理, 2003, 17(2): 35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7743.2003.02.011.]
    [13] MA W W, YAN S J, WANG Y X, et al. Study on seed dispersal modes and landscape application strategies of spontaneous plants in street tree planting ponds: Taking Fuzhou City as an example [J]. J Sichuan For Sci Technol, 2021, 42(5): 107-114. [马雯雯, 闫淑君, 王云霄, 等. 行道树种植池自生植物的种子传播方式及园林应用策略研究——以福州市为例[J]. 四川林业科技, 2021, 42(5): 107-114. doi: 10.12172/202101230002.]
    [14] LIU F Q, WU T, JIANG G J, et al. Dynamic response of the coastline and coastal landscape patterns to hemeroby: A case study along the south coast of Yingkou [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(22): 7427-7437. [刘富强, 吴涛, 蒋国俊, 等. 海岸线与海岸景观格局对人为干扰度的动态响应——以营口市南部海岸为例[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(22): 7427-7437. doi: 10.5846/stxb201609211902.]
    [15] TANG S J, YANG L, LIU M J, et al. Spatial pattern of the occurrence of Mikania micrantha in Dapeng Peninsula, Shenzhen [J]. J Biosaf, 2023, 32(3): 226-234. [唐尚杰, 杨龙, 刘美洁, 等. 深圳大鹏半岛薇甘菊的空间发生规律[J]. 生物安全学报, 2023, 32(3): 226-234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2023.03.005.]
    [16] SUN Y Z, WANG Z T, BAO Y, et al. Responses of plant community structure and stability to artificial disturbance in urban remnant mountains [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2023, 42(8): 1829-1840. [孙玉真, 王志泰, 包玉, 等. 城市遗存山体植物群落结构与稳定性对人为干扰的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1829-1840. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890. 202308.010.]
    [17] SCHOENER T W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities: Research on how similar species divide resources helps reveal the natural regulation of species diversity [J]. Science, 1974, 185(4145): 27-39. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4145.27.
    [18] PIANKA E R. The structure of lizard communities [J]. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1973, 4(1): 53-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413.
    [19] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications [J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3): 998-1005. doi: 10.2307/1938071.
    [20] WANG B S, PENG S L. Studies on the measuring techniques of inter-specific association of lower-subtropical evergreen-broadleaved forests: I. The exploration and the revision on the measuring formulas of interspecific association [J]. Acta Phytoecol Geobot Sin, 1985, 9(4): 274-285. [王伯荪, 彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究: Ⅰ. 种间联结测式的探讨与修正[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1985, 9(4): 274-285.]
    [21] ZHENG Y R. Comparison of methods for studying stability of forest community [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2000, 36(5): 28-32. [郑元润. 森林群落稳定性研究方法初探[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(5): 28-32. doi: 10. 3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2000.05.005.]
    [22] XIAO Z L, CHEN Y P, JING S H, et al. Analysis of niche charac-teristics of main tree species in broad-leaved mixed forest in Yuan’an County of Hubei Province [J]. South China For Sci, 2020, 48(3): 12-19. [肖正利, 陈玉萍, 敬顺华, 等. 湖北远安县阔叶混交林乔木树种生态位特征分析[J]. 南方林业科学, 2020, 48(3): 12-19. doi: 10. 16259/j.cnki.36-1342/s.2020.03.003.]
    [23] WANG X F, WANG T, WANG Q, et al. Effects of Bidens alba invasion on structure and species diversity of plant community [J]. J Biosaf, 2023, 32(4): 384-392. [王小飞, 王涛, 王琦, 等. 白花鬼针草入侵对植物群落结构及物种多样性的影响[J]. 生物安全学报, 2023, 32(4): 384-392. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2023.04.011.]
    [24] CHEN L, XIN J N, SU Y, et al. Effects of heterogeneous habitats on community composition and niche characteristics of different plant populations in the desert steppe of China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(17): 6187-6205. [陈林, 辛佳宁, 苏莹, 等. 异质生境对荒漠草原植物群落组成和种群生态位的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6187-6205. doi: 10.5846/stxb201810182255.]
    [25] YIN C J, MA L, ZHU D H, et al. Species composition and niche characteristics of secondary plant communities on regenerated land-slides after earthquake [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2022, 41(8): 1525-1534. [尹才佳, 马龙, 朱大海, 等. 地震滑坡体自然恢复后次生植物群落物种组成及生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1525-1534. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202208.010.]
    [26] ZHENG X Y, ZHAO C, LIU Q Q, et al. Niche characteristics of understory herb layer in a mature Chinese fir plantation [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(2): 332-338. [郑晓阳, 赵冲, 刘青青, 等. 成熟杉木人工林林下草本层生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2): 332-338. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201802.031.]
    [27] LI Y F, TIE J, ZHANG G P, et al. Niche characteristics of an artificial Pinus tabuliformis forest in Manghe National Nature Reserve of Shanxi [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2014, 33(11): 2905-2912. [李燕芬, 铁军, 张桂萍, 等. 山西蟒河国家级自然保护区人工油松林生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(11): 2905-2912. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890. 20141022.012.]
    [28] ZHANG Y F, ZHENG Z H, CHEN X B, et al. Niche characteristics of the invasive plant Ageratum conyzoides and its commonly associated weeds [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(9): 3727-3737. [张亚芬, 郑子洪, 陈旭波, 等. 入侵植物藿香蓟与常见伴生杂草的生态位特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(9): 3727-3737. doi: 10.5846/stxb202104060881.]
    [29] LIU R H, CHEN L, TU H R, et al. Niche and interspecific association of main species in shrub layer of Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in karst hills of Guilin, southwest China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(6): 2057-2071. [刘润红, 陈乐, 涂洪润, 等. 桂林岩溶石山青冈群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 2057-2071. doi: 10.5846/stxb201904090689.]
    [30] CHEN H Y, LAN M Y, SUN C X, et al. Community structure and interspecific association in different forest successional stages in north Guangdong [J]. J For Environ, 2022, 42(5): 465-473. [陈泓宇, 兰明钰, 孙传玺, 等. 粤北不同演替阶段森林群落结构与种间关联[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2022, 42(5): 465-473. doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2022. 05.003.]
    [31] LUO Q H, SUN F, CUI Y, et al. Interspecific association among main plant species in the unstable slope with high-frequency debris flow [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24(4): 689-696. [罗清虎, 孙凡, 崔羽, 等. 泥石流频发流域失稳性坡面主要植物种间关联性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(4): 689-696. doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.11005.]
    [32] XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(24): 8224-8233. [徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24): 8224-8233. doi: 10.5846/stxb201505311092.]
    [33] GUO Q S, BAO F Q, WANG X F, et al. Interspecies connection of dominant tree species in Cephalotaxus fortunei communities [J]. For Res, 2008, 21(5): 662-668. [郭泉水, 包奋强, 王祥福, 等. 三尖杉所属群落优势乔木树种种间关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(5): 662-668. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.05.013.]
    [34] JIAN X M, SHUI W, CHEN Y P, et al. Interspecific relationships of dominant species in the grassland community of moderately degraded Tiankeng of Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018, 29(2): 492-500. [简小枚, 税伟, 陈毅萍, 等. 云南中度退化的喀斯特天坑草地植物群落优势种种间关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(2): 492-500. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201802.005.]
    [35] GUO J B, DI X Y, LI S Q. Interspecific associations among dominant species in naturally colonized plant communities on coal gob piles of the Datong mining area in Shanxi, China [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34(12): 3327-3332. [郭俊兵, 狄晓艳, 李素清. 山西大同矿区煤矸石山自然定居植物群落优势种种间关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(12): 3327-3332. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2015.0303.]
    [36] ZHANG D M, ZHAO W Z, LUO W C. Niche and interspecific asso-ciation of dominant plant species in saline-alkaline soils of desert steppe zone [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(5): 1307-1315. [张东梅, 赵文智, 罗维成. 荒漠草原带盐碱地优势植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1307-1315. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201805.027.]
    [37] WANG Y X, YAN S J, MA W W, et al. Investigation and analysis of lawn spontaneous plant in Fuzhou National Forest Park [J]. J Chin Urban For, 2021, 19(6): 94-98. [王云霄, 闫淑君, 马雯雯, 等. 福州国家森林公园草坪自生植物调查分析[J]. 中国城市林业, 2021, 19(6): 94-98. doi: 10.12169/zgcsly.2020.09.25.0005.]
    [38] WANG W, GUO Q, KANG H J, et al. Community composition and interspecific association analysis of Kobresia capillifolia grassland [J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2015, 35(10): 2096-2102. [王伟, 郭倩, 康海军, 等. 线叶嵩草草地群落构成及种间关联分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(10): 2096-2102. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2015. 10.2096.]
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

谢婉丽,王奇悦,王秋雪,甘婉怡,武艳芳,黄柳菁.闽江福州段自生草本植物生态位和种间联结研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2025,33(2):149~158

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:16
  • PDF: 12
  • HTML: 3
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:October 30,2023
  • Revised:January 08,2024
  • Online: April 03,2025
Article QR Code