Population Structure and Dynamic Analysis of Wild Cathaya argyrophylla in Dashahe National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [38]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Cathaya argyrophylla is one of the endemic rare and endangered wild plant with extremely small population in China, and is also the key protected object and flagship species in Guizhou Dashahe National Nature Reserve. Based on survey data of wild C. argyrophylla in the reserve in 2022, the quantitative dynamic index was calculated, static life table was compiled, survival curve was drawn, and survival function and spectral analysis were introduced to describe its structural dynamics. The results showed that the age structure of wild C. argyrophylla population was inverted J-type, and the dynamic change index of population (Vpi) was 39.43%, which was greater than Vpi' and both of them were greater than 0, indicating that the C. argyrophylla population was a growth type, but the growth was slow, and it was sensitive to external disturbance. The survival curve of the population belonged to Deevey-II type, and the survival rate, cumulative mortality rate, mortality density and risk rate changed greatly in age class from I to III stage, and then tended to be stable. The life spectral analysis showed that the III age class was the main stage affecting C. argyrophylla population. Therefore, the large number of young individuals and high mortality rates of C. argyrophylla in the reserve was the main reason leading to the difficulties of regeneration. It was suggested that the reserve should strengthen the care of C. argyrophylla seedlings and improve the living environment, so as to promote the natural regeneration and recovery of C. argyrophylla population.

    Reference
    [1] CHHETRI P K, BISTA R, CAIRNS D M. Population structure and dynamics of Abies spectabilis at treeline ecotone of Barun Valley, Makalu Barun National Park, Nepal [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(4): 269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2016.05.003.
    [2] KANG D, GUO Y X, REN C J, et al. Population structure and spatial pattern of main tree species in secondary Betula platyphylla forest in Ziwuling Mountains, China [J]. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 6873. doi: 10.1038/srep06873.
    [3] BA L, LI Z J, YANG X R. Mechanisms and advance of apparent competition among plant populations [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2023, 43(13): 5281–5288. [巴雷, 李志坚, 杨雪茹. 植物种群表观竞争机制及其研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(13): 5281–5288. doi: 10.5846/stxb 202110142902.]
    [4] ZHAO P, XU X Y, ZHANG Y N, et al. Age structure and its dynamics of artificial Haloxylon ammodendron population in Minqin oasis-desert ecotone [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2023, 43(14): 6069–6079. [赵鹏, 徐先英, 张裕年, 等. 民勤绿洲荒漠过渡带人工梭梭种群年龄结构及动态[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(14): 6069–6079. doi: 10.5846/stxb202204040866.]
    [5] LUO X, GUO Q J, YAO L, et al. Characteristics of natural population structure of endangered plant Liriodendron chinense [J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2021, 41(7): 115–123. [罗西, 郭秋菊, 姚兰, 等. 濒危植物鹅掌楸的天然种群结构特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(7): 115–123. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2021.07.014.]
    [6] YU L H, LI Y Q, CHEN Z M, et al. Community and population struc- ture of natural Taxus chinensis var. mairei in Jiangxi province [J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2021, 41(11): 164-172. [喻龙华, 历月桥, 陈珍明, 等. 江西天然南方红豆后山群落及种群结构特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(11): 164–172. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x. 2021. 11.018.]
    [7] MAO Z Z. Cathaya argyrophylla, an endemic tree of China, its resources, distribution and environment [J]. Guihaia, 1989, 9(1): 1–11. [毛宗铮. 我国特有植物银杉的资源、分布及其环境[J]. 广西植物, 1989, 9(1): 1–11. ]
    [8] XIE Z Q. Chinese endemic plant Cathaya argyrophylla and its research [J]. Biodiv Sci, 1995, 3(2): 99–103. [谢宗强. 中国特有植物银杉及其研究[J]. 生物多样性, 1995, 3(2): 99–103.]
    [9] XIE Z Q, CHEN W L, LU P, et al. Growth and population biomass of Cathaya argyrophylla [J]. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 1999, 23(6): 536–543. [谢宗强, 陈伟烈, 路鹏, 等. 银杉单株生长规律与种群生物量的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(6): 536–543.]
    [10] QI C J, XIAO Y T. Community analysis of Cathaya argyrophyiia forest on the Bamianshan mountain of Hunan Province [J]. Bull Bot Res, 1988, 8(4): 169–182. [祁承经, 肖育檀. 湖南省八面山银杉林的群落学分析[J]. 植物研究, 1988, 8(4): 169–182.]
    [11] FU L G, CHENG S Z. The discovery and naming of Cathaya argyro- phylla [J]. Life World, 1981(4): 42–43. [傅立国, 程树志. 银杉的发现及命名[J]. 植物杂志, 1981(4): 42–43.]
    [12] SU L Y, ZHAO W Y, ZHANG J J, et al. Analyses on community characteristics and its relict and conservation of Cathaya argyrophylla at Bamianshan in Hunan Province [J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2016, 25(4): 76-86. [苏乐怡, 赵万义, 张记军, 等. 湖南八面山银杉群落特征及其残遗性和保守性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016, 25(4): 76–86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.04.10.]
    [13] XIE Z Q, CHEN W L, LIU Z Y, et al. Spatial distribution pattern of Cathaya argyrophylla population [J]. Acta Bot Sin, 1999, 41(1): 95–101. [谢宗强, 陈伟烈, 刘正宇, 等. 银杉种群的空间分布格局[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 41(1): 95–101. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-9072.1999.01.019.]
    [14] XIE Z Q, CHEN W L, LU P, et al. The demography and age structure of the endangered plant population of Cathaya argyrophylla [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1999, 19(4): 523–528. [谢宗强, 陈伟烈, 路鹏, 等. 濒危植物银杉的种群统计与年龄结构[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(4): 523–528.]
    [15] ZHANG W F, FAN D Y, XIE Z Q, et al. The seasonal photosynthetic responses of seedlings of the endangered plant Cathaya argyrophylla to different growth light environments [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2005, 13(5): 387– 397. [张旺锋, 樊大勇, 谢宗强, 等. 濒危植物银杉幼树对生长光强的季节性光合响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2005, 13(5): 387–397. doi: 10. 3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2005.05.003.]
    [16] WANG X Q, ZOU Y P, ZHANG D M, et al. Genetic diversity analysis by RAPD in Cathaya argyrophylla Chun et Kuang [J]. Sci China Ser C Life Sci, 1997, 40(2): 145–151. [汪小全, 邹喻苹, 张大明, 等. 银杉遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 中国科学C辑: 生命科学, 1996, 26(5): 436–441.]
    [17] JIN Z X. A study on Heptacodium miconioides community in the Tiantai Mountains of Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1998, 18(2): 127–132. [金则新. 浙江天台山七子花群落研究[J]. 生态学报, 1998, 18(2): 127–132. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1998.02.003.]
    [18] KANG H J, CHEN Z L, LIU P, et al. The population structure and distribution pattern of Emmenopterys henryi in Dapanshan natural reserve of Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(1): 389–396. [康华靖, 陈子林, 刘鹏, 等. 大盘山自然保护区香果树种群结构与分布格局[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(1): 389–396. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-0933.2007.01.045.]
    [19] MENG G T, CHAI Y, FANG X J, et al. A preliminary study of population dymamics of Pseudotsuga sinensis population in northeastern Yunnan [J]. J NW For Univ, 2008, 23(6): 54–59. [孟广涛, 柴勇, 方向京, 等. 滇东北黄杉种群数量动态的初步研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(6): 54–59.]
    [20] HE B, ZHANG P, LI Q, et al. Population structure and spatial distri- bution pattern of a rare and endangered plant Pseudotsuga sinensis [J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2022, 30(4): 461–471. [何斌, 张萍, 李青, 等. 珍稀濒危植物黄杉种群结构与空间分布格局[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2022, 30(4): 461–471. doi: 10.11926/jtsb.4507.]
    [21] CHEN X D. A study on the method of quantitative analysis for plant population and community structural dynamics [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1999, 18(2): 214–217. [陈晓德. 植物种群与群落结构动态量化分析方法研究[J]. 生态学报, 1998, 18(2): 214–217. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000- 0933.1998.02.017.]
    [22] ZHANG W, JIAO Z W, SHANG T C, et al. Demography and spectrum analysis of Juglans cathayensis populations at different altitudes in the west Tianshan Valley in Xinjiang, China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26(4): 1091–1098. [张维, 焦子伟, 尚天翠, 等. 新疆西天山峡谷海拔梯度上野核桃种群统计与谱分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4): 1091–1098. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20141224.008.]
    [23] ZHANG J F, GE S S, LIANG J H, et al. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of Tilia amurensis in broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in Changbai Mountain [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(13): 5381–5390. [张金峰, 葛树森, 梁金花, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林紫椴种群结构与动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5381–5390. doi: 10.5846/stxb202106191629.]
    [24] WANG J, YAO L, AI X R, et al. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Betula luminifera populations in different regions of southwest Hubei Province, China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31(2): 357–365. [王进, 姚兰, 艾训儒, 等. 鄂西南不同区域亮叶桦种群结构与动态特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 357–365. doi: 10.13287/j.1001- 9332.202002.010.]
    [25] DEEVEY E S Jr. Life tables for natural populations of animals [J]. Quart Rev Biol, 1947, 22(4): 283–314. doi: 10.1086/395888.
    [26] HETT J M, LOUCKS O L. Age structure models of balsam fir and eastern hemlock [J]. J Ecol, 1976, 64(3): 1029–1044. doi: 10.2307/2258822.
    [27] YANG F X, WANG S Q, XU H G, et al. The theory of survival analysis and its application to life table [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1991, 11(2): 153–158. [杨凤翔, 王顺庆, 徐海根, 等. 生存分析理论及其在研究生命表中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 1991, 11(2): 153–158.]
    [28] LU J, GUO Q Q, ZHENG W L, et al. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of Pinus densata in southeast Xizang [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2013, 49(8): 154–160. [卢杰, 郭其强, 郑维列, 等. 藏东南高山松种群结构及动态特征[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(8): 154–160. doi: 10. 11707/j.1001-7488.20130822.]
    [29] WU Y G, HAN J X. A spectral analysis of the population dynamics of Korean pine in the mixed broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis forest [J]. Chin J Ecol, 1988, 7(1): 19–23. [伍业钢, 韩进轩. 阔叶红松林红松种群动态的谱分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 1988, 7(1): 19–23.]
    [30] HONG W, WANG X G, WU C Z, et al. Life table and spectral analysis of endangered plant Taxus chinensis var. mairei population [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15(6): 1109–1112. [洪伟, 王新功, 吴承祯, 等. 濒危植物南方红豆杉种群生命表及谱分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(6): 1109–1112].
    [31] LI M M, LIU P C, KONG W M, et al. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of the endangered Pseudotsuga forrestii Craib [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(13): 5504–5515. [李敏敏, 刘鹏程, 孔维民, 等. 濒危植物澜沧黄杉种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5504–5515. doi: 10.5846/stxb202001100087.]
    [32] ZHAO Y, LIU J Q, CHEN X L, et al. Population structure charac- teristics of Picea purpurea in the upstream of Taohe River [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(3): 266–276. [赵阳, 刘锦乾, 陈学龙, 等. 洮河上游紫果云杉种群结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(03): 266– 276. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0077].
    [33] QIN A L, MA F Q, XU G X, et al. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of a rare and endangered tree species Michelia wilsonii Finet et Gagn [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(13): 4445–4454. [秦爱丽, 马凡强, 许格希, 等. 珍稀濒危树种峨眉含笑种群结构与动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(13): 4445–4454. doi: 10.5846/stxb201905211042].
    [34] ZHAO H J, YANG R, YUAN C J, et al. Population structure and spatial distribution pattern of Rhododendron pudingense [J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2024, 32(1): 46–54. [赵宏玖, 杨瑞, 袁丛军, 等. 普定杜鹃花种群结构和空间分布格局[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2024, 32(1): 46–54. doi: 10.11926/jtsb.4725]
    [35] ZHANG J F, CHEN J M, YAN X F, et al. Effects of seed charac- teristics and sowing depth on seed germination and seedling growth of Quercus wutaishanica [J]. Guihaia, 2020, 40(2): 226–236. [张金峰, 程继铭, 闫兴富, 等. 种子特征和播种深度对辽东栎种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2020, 40(2): 226–236. doi: 10.11931/gui haia.gxzw201812045].
    [36] XIANG X Y, WU G L, DUAN R Y, et al. Studies on population structure and dynamics of Pinus dabeshanensis [J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(1): 55–62. [项小燕, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 等. 大别山五针松种群结构及动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(1): 55–62. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601007.]
    [37] LI N, BAI B, LU C H. Recruitment limitation of plant population: From seed production to sapling establishment [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31(21): 6624–6632. [李宁, 白冰, 鲁长虎. 植物种群更新限制——从种子生产到幼树建成[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(21): 6624–6632.]
    [38] ZHANG W H, ZU Y G, LIU G B. Population ecological characteristics and analysis on endangered cause of ten endangered plant species [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002, 22(9): 1512–1520. [张文辉, 祖元刚, 刘国彬. 十种濒危植物的种群生态学特征及致危因素分析[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(9): 1512–1520. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.09.021.]
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

王林津,杨瑞,韩继怀,勾伟,赵洋洋,高旭.贵州大沙河国家级自然保护区野生银杉种群结构和动态分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(5):571~578

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:163
  • PDF: 2295
  • HTML: 156
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 19,2023
  • Revised:September 28,2023
  • Online: September 29,2024
Article QR Code