Home > Archive>Volume 32, Issue 5, 2024 >601-610. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4815
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Interspecific Associations and Community Stability Changes of Dominant Woody Species of Natural Forest Communities in Mulinzi National Nature Reserve
Author:
  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [31]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to explore the changes of natural forest community structure in the national nature reserve, fourty-five 20 m×20 m plots were set up in three restoration stages, including original old forest (restored for 100 years or more), secondary forest restored for 40 and 25 years after clear-cutting. The interspecific association and community stability of dominant woody plants were studied by using Variance ratio (VR), χ2 test, Pearson correlation test, Spearman rank correlation test and M-Godron stability test. The results showed that there was no significant positive association on the whole of dominant woody species in secondary forest restored for 25 and 40 years, but the significant positive association appeared in original aged forest restored for 100 years. The χ2 test showed that the interspecific associations were not significant in 25 and 40 years plant communities, and only 2 species pairs in 100 years plant communities were significantly associated, and the interspecific associations were loose. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient test and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test also showed that the correlations among species pairs of most species were not significant, and displayed an independent distribution pattern. The M-Godron stability analysis showed that the plant community was in an unstable state at different stages, but the stability of the community gradually increased with restoration time. Therefore, interspecific correlation in the natural forest communities was weak at different restoration stages, and the species distributed independently and changed frequently, indicating that the community was still in the process of succession and was developing towards a stable stage.

    Reference
    [1] TU H R, NONG J L, ZHU J, et al. Interspecific associations of main species and community stability of Myrsine seguinii community in karst hills of Guilin, southwestern China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(9): 3688–3705. [涂洪润, 农娟丽, 朱军, 等. 桂林岩溶石山密花树群落主要物种的种间关联及群落稳定性[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(9): 3688–3705. doi: 10.5846/stxb202105061175.]
    [2] WAN Y Y, LI H Y, MO X Q, et al. Analysis of inter-specific relation- ships among community dominant species after vegetation restoration in coastal saline alkali area [J]. J Arid Land Res Environ, 2017, 31(2): 147–154. [万媛媛, 李洪远, 莫训强, 等. 滨海盐碱区湿地植被恢复后群落优势种种间关系分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(2): 147–154. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.059.]
    [3] LI X, ZHU W Z, SHU S M, et al. Interspecific association and stability of vegetation in the dry-warm valley of the middle reaches of Dadu River [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2021, 27(2): 325–333. [李霞, 朱万泽, 舒树淼, 等. 大渡河中游干暖河谷植被种间关系与稳定性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(2): 325–333. doi: 10.19675/j.cnki. 1006-687x.2021.01032.]
    [4] LIU R H, JIANG Y, CHANG B, et al. Interspecific associations and correlations among the main woody plants in a Pterocarya stenoptera community in a riparian zone of Lijiang River, Guilin, southwest China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(19): 6881–6893. [刘润红, 姜勇, 常斌, 等. 漓江河岸带枫杨群落主要木本植物种间联结与相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19): 6881–6893. doi: 10.5846/stxb201802270396.]
    [5] WANG H M, PANG C H, ZHANG F, et al. Interspecific association of dominant species of wetland vegetation in the middle and lower reaches of Fenhe River, Shanxi Province of China [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2012, 31(10): 2507–2512. [王慧敏, 庞春花, 张峰, 等. 汾河流域中下游湿地植被优势种种间关联性分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(10): 2507–2512. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0386.]
    [6] ZHOU L L, ZHANG Q Q, ZHAO Y T, et al. Species association and correlation between vertical layers in the Liquidambar formosana community in Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(12): 1136–1145. [周刘丽, 张晴晴, 赵延涛, 等. 浙江天童枫香树群落不同垂直层次物种间的联结性与相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(12): 1136–1145. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0110.]
    [7] DING M, WANG Y K, HE Y R, et al. Changes of species diversity, interspecific associations and community stability for the deciduous broad-leaved forest in Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve, Anhui Province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2023, 43(7): 2818–2830. [丁茂, 汪宇坤, 何煜然, 等. 安徽鹞落坪国家级自然保护区落叶阔叶林树种多样性、种间联结及群落稳定性变化[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(7): 2818– 2830. doi: 10.5846/stxb202204191059.]
    [8] ROSENTHAL G. Selecting target species to evaluate the success of wet grassland restoration [J]. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2003, 98(1/2/3): 227–246. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00083-5.
    [9] YAO L, CUI G F, YI Y M, et al. Species diversity of woody plants in Mulinzi Nature Reserve of Hubei Province [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2016, 52(1): 1–9. [姚兰, 崔国发, 易咏梅, 等. 湖北木林子保护区大样地的木本植物多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(1): 1–9. doi: 10.11707/j. 1001-7488.20160101.]
    [10] CHEN J, AI X R, YAO L, et al. Population dynamics and point pattern analysis of Cyclobalanopsis multinervis in large plot, Mulinzi Nature Reserve [J]. J For Environ, 2017, 37(4): 459–464. [陈俊, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 等. 木林子大样地多脉青冈种群动态及点格局[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2017, 37(4): 459–464. doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2017.04.014.]
    [11] WANG J, ZHU J, AI X R, et al. Spatial distribution pattern and intraspecific and interspecific relationships of genus Symplocos in Mulinzi Nature Reserve, Hubei Province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(21): 7709–7720. [王进, 朱江, 艾训儒, 等. 湖北木林子保护区山矾属植物空间分布格局及其关联性[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21): 7709–7720. doi: 10.5846/stxb201905231066.]
    [12] HUANG X, YAO L, AI X R, et al. Spatial distribution patterns and correlations of two species of Litsea in large sample plot in Mulinzi National Nature Reserve [J]. Guihaia, 2021, 41(8): 1333–1345. [黄小, 姚兰, 艾训儒, 等. 木林子大样地两个木姜子属物种空间分布格局及关联性[J]. 广西植物, 2021, 41(8): 1333–1345. doi: 10.11931/gui haia.gxzw201909005.]
    [13] LIN Y, AI X R, YAO L, et al. Niches of main dominant species of different community types in Mulinzi Nature Reserve [J]. J Nat Res, 2017, 32(2): 223–234. [林勇, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 等. 木林子自然保护区不同群落类型主要优势种群的生态位研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 223–234. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160305.]
    [14] LAN G Y. Research progress on large, long-term plot of tropical forest ecosystem in the world [J]. Acta Boreali-Occid Bot, 2007, 27(10): 2140–2145. [兰国玉. 世界热带森林生态系统大样地定位研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(10): 2140–2145. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-4025.2007.10.033.]
    [15] HUANG Y T, YAO L, AI X R, et al. Quantitative classification of the subtropical evergreen-deciduous broadleaved mixed forest and the deciduous and evergreen species composition structure across two national nature reserves in the southwest of Hubei, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(10): 990–1002. [黄永涛, 姚兰, 艾训儒, 等. 鄂西南两个自然保护区亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林类型及其常绿和落叶物种组成结构分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10): 990–1002. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0096.]
    [16] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications [J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3): 998–1005. doi: 10.2307/1938071.
    [17] YANG Q Q, YANG Z Y, CHEN X H, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Syzygium odora- tum in tropical coast [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2017, 53(9): 105–113. [杨青青, 杨众养, 陈小花, 等. 热带海岸香蒲桃天然次生林群落优势种群种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9): 105–113. doi: 10.11707/j.1001- 7488.20170913.]
    [18] XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(24): 8224–8233. [徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24): 8224–8233. doi: 10.5846/stxb201505311092.]
    [19] YUE P P, ZHOU J J, WANG H. Interspecific association analysis of Artemisia ordosica community in eastern edge of Mu Us sandy land [J]. Ecol Sci, 2017, 36(6): 147–152. [岳鹏鹏, 周静静, 王华. 毛乌素沙地东缘黑沙蒿群落种间联结性分析[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36(6): 147– 152. doi: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2017.06.020.]
    [20] PEI S X, FA L, DU M Y, et al. Effects of interspecific relationship on natural regeneration and community stability of Pinus tabuliformis Plantation in Zhongtiao Mountain [J]. For Res, 2022, 35(1): 150–157. [裴顺祥, 法蕾, 杜满义, 等. 种间关系对中条山油松人工林天然更新及群落稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(1): 150–157. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.01.017.]
    [21] SONG Y C. Vegetation Ecology [M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Edu- cation Press, 2017: 44–84. [宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 第2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017: 44–84.]
    [22] JIANG N H, ZHANG S H. Interspecific association and environmental interpretation of dominant herbaceous species in Pinus yunnanensis forest in the western suburbs of Chuxiong City [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2021, 30(11): 2109–2120. [姜倪皓, 张诗函. 楚雄市西郊云南松林下草本优势种种间联结及环境解释[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(11): 2109–2120. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.11.001.]
    [23] ZHOU Q J, ZHAO C M, SHU H W, et al. Interspecific association of natural mixed needle- and broad-leaved forest community in Shen- nongjia [J]. Guihaia, 2020, 40(2): 255–263. [周秋静, 赵常明, 舒化伟, 等. 神农架天然针阔混交林群落的种间联结性[J]. 广西植物, 2020, 40(2): 255–263. doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201903029.]
    [24] ZHENG Y R. Comparison of methods for studying stability of forest community [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2000, 36(5): 28–32. [郑元润. 森林群落稳定性研究方法初探[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(5): 28–32. doi: 10. 3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2000.05.005.]
    [25] ZHANG M X, WANG D X, KANG B, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Pinus armandii in Qinling Mountains [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2015, 51(1): 12–21. [张明霞, 王得祥, 康冰, 等. 秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1): 12–21. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150102.]
    [26] HUANG S N, LI Y D, LUO T S, et al. Dynamics of associations between tree species in a secondary tropical montane rain forest at Jianfengling on Hainan Island [J]. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2000, 24(5): 569–574. [黄世能, 李意德, 骆土寿, 等. 海南岛尖峰岭次生热带山地雨林树种间的联结动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(5): 569–574.]
    [27] CHEN J, AI X R, YAO L, et al. Niche characteristics and interspecific association of dominant species of the Carpinus fargesiana+Cycloba- lanopsis glauca-Weigela japonica community in Mulinzi Nature Reserve [J]. J Hubei Univ Nat (Nat Sci), 2017, 35(3): 255–260. [陈俊, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 等. 木林子川陕鹅耳枥+青冈-水马桑群落优势种生态位与种间关联[J]. 湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(3): 255–260. doi: 10.13501/j.cnki.42-1569/n.2017.09.003.]
    [28] LIU R H, CHEN L, TU H R, et al. Niche and interspecific association of main species in shrub layer of Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in karst hills of Guilin, southwest China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(6): 2057–2071. [刘润红, 陈乐, 涂洪润, 等. 桂林岩溶石山青冈群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 2057– 2071. doi: 10.5846/stxb201904090689.]
    [29] YU X Y, YU R, HUANG J, et al. Analysis on interspecific associa- tions among dominant populations in each layer of Loropetalum subcordatum community in Maolan National Nature Reserve of Gui- zhou [J]. J Plant Res Environ, 2018, 27(2): 24–32. [俞筱押, 余瑞, 黄娟, 等. 贵州茂兰国家级自然保护区四药门花群落各层次优势种群的种间联结性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2018, 27(2): 24–32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2018.02.04.]
    [30] VALENCIA E, DE BELLO F, GALLAND T, et al. Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale [J]. Proc Nat Acad USA, 2020, 117(39): 24345–24351. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.1920405117.
    [31] CHEN H Y, LAN M Y, SUN C X, et al. Community structure and interspecific association in different forest successional stages in north Guangdong [J]. J For Environ, 2022, 42(5): 465–473. [陈泓宇, 兰明钰, 孙传玺, 等. 粤北不同演替阶段森林群落结构与种间关联[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2022, 42(5): 465–473. doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2022. 05.003.]
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

陈锦世,郭秋菊,姚兰,朱江,刘西尧,向钦,赵奂敦,艾训儒.木林子国家级自然保护区天然林群落优势木本植物种间联结和稳定性[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(5):601~610

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:136
  • PDF: 2251
  • HTML: 124
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 07,2023
  • Revised:August 11,2023
  • Online: September 29,2024
Article QR Code
You are the first4641538 Visitors
Governing Body：中国科学院
Organizer：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
Address：Xingke Road 723,Tianhe District,Guangzhou,China
Phone：+86 (0)20-3725 2514
Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany ® 2025 All Rights Reserved