Patterns and Climatic Drivers of Plant Phenology on Campus: A Case Study of Hainan University
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [45]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The phenological patterns of plants tend to fluctuate, with variations occurring in the timing and amount of leaf-out, flowering, and fruiting from year to year or event to event. However, the phenological patterns in tropical regions are still largely unknown. The phenology of 126 plant species located in the campus of Hainan University in Haikou, Hainan Island were observed and recorded over three years, including leaf-out, flowering, and fruiting time. The main climate factors affecting plant phenology in tropical areas were analyzed by multiple regression analysis of phenology and environmental variables. The results showed that plant phenological patterns in the tropics were distinctly seasonal, leaf-out, flowering, and fruiting phenology occurred in April—June, April—August, and May—November, respectively. The climatic factors affecting the phenological pattern of leaf spreading and flowering were the average sunshine duration per month, and the number of fruit bearing species per month was correlated with air temperature, especially the number of fruit ripening species per month was significantly correlated with the monthly minimum air temperature. There were differences in the phenological periods among different functional groups. The leaf-out of shrubs was earlier than that of herbs and trees, leaf-out of wind-borne plants was earlier than that of insect-borne plants, and the leaf-out and fruit ripening time of fleshy-fruited plants were earlier than those of non-fleshy fruited plants. Bloom of trees was earlier than that of herbs and shrubs, which non-fleshy-fruited plants was earlier than fleshy-fruited plants, and fruit mature of wind-borne plants was earlier than that of insect-borne plants. These would be of great significance for predicting tropical phenological events in the future.

    Reference
    [1] ROBERTS A M I, TANSEY C, SMITHERS R J, et al. Predicting a change in the order of spring phenology in temperate forests [J]. Glob Change Biol, 2015, 21(7): 2603-2611. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12896.
    [2] FRIDLEY J D. Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions [J]. Nature, 2012, 485(7398): 359-362. doi: 10.1038/nature11056.
    [3] POLGAR C A, PRIMACK R B. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: From trees to ecosystems [J]. New Phytol, 2011, 191(4): 926-941. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x.
    [4] CHUINE I, BEAUBIEN E G. Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range [J]. Ecol Lett, 2001, 4(5): 500-510. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00261.x.
    [5] GUO L, DAI J H, WANG M C, et al. Responses of spring phenology in temperate zone trees to climate warming: A case study of apricot flowering in China [J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2015, 201: 1-7. doi: 10. 1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.016.
    [6] YANG J, LUO X, JIN C, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of vegetation phenology along the urbanrural gradient in coastal Dalian, China [J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2020, 54: 126784. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020. 126784.
    [7] KOPTUR S, HABER W A, FRANKIE G W, et al. Phenological studies of shrub and treelet species in tropical cloud forests of Costa Rica [J]. J Trop Ecol, 1988, 4(4): 323-346. doi: 10.1017/S0266467400002984.
    [8] ANDERSON D P, NORDHEIM E V, MOERMOND T C, et al. Factors influencing tree phenology in Taï National Park, Côte d’lvoire [J]. Biotropica, 2005, 37(4): 631-640. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.000 80.x.
    [9] JUSTINIANO M J, FREDERICKSEN T S. Phenology of tree species in Bolivian dry forests [J]. Biotropica, 2000, 32(2): 6-281. doi: 10. 1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00470.x.
    [10] ZHANG G M, SONG Q S, YANG D R. Phenology of Ficus racemosa in Xishuangbanna, southwest China [J]. Biotropica, 2006, 38(3): 334-341. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00150.x.
    [11] FLYNN D F B, WOLKOVICH E M. Temperature and photoperiod drive spring phenology across all species in a temperate forest community [J]. New Phytol, 2018, 219(4): 1353-1362. doi: 10.1111/ nph.15232.
    [12] SONG Z Q, SONG X Q, PAN Y Q, et al. Effects of winter chilling and photoperiod on leaf-out and flowering in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in China [J]. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 458: 117766. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117766.
    [13] HU X L, CHANGYANG C H, MI X C et al. Influence of climate, phylogeny, and functional traits on flowering phenology in a subtro-pical evergreen broad-leaved forest, East China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2015, 23(5): 601-609. [胡小丽, 张杨家豪, 米湘成, 等. 浙江古田山亚热带常绿阔叶林开花物候: 气候因素、系统发育关系和功能性状的影响 [J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(5): 601-609. doi: 10.17520/biods.2015 083.]
    [14] MARQUES M C M, ROPER J J, SALVALAGGIO A P B. Phenological patterns among plant life-forms in a subtropical forest in southern Brazil [J]. Plant Ecol, 2004, 173(2): 203-213. doi: 10.1023/B:VEGE. 0000029325.85031.90.
    [15] BOLLEN A, DONATI G. Phenology of the littoral forest of Sainte Luce, Southeastern Madagascar [J]. Biotropica, 2005, 37(1): 32-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.04094.x.
    [16] SAKAI S, KITAJIMA K. Tropical phenology: Recent advances and perspectives [J]. Ecol Res, 2019, 34(1): 50-54. doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.1131.
    [17] WRIGHT S J, CALDERÓN O, MULLERLANDAU H C. A phenollogy model for tropical species that flower multiple times each year [J]. Ecol Res, 2019, 34(1): 20-29. doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.1017.
    [18] DUDGEON D, CORLETT R. Hills and Streams: An Ecology of Hong Kong [M]. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press, 1994.
    [19] DU Y J, MAO L F, QUEENBOROUGH S A, et al. Phylogenetic constraints and trait correlates of flowering phenology in the angiosperm flora of China [J]. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2015, 24(8): 928-938. doi: 10. 1111/geb.12303.
    [20] HU X L, CHANG Z Y, DU Y J. Effects of pollination mode and fruit type on reproductive phenology of woody plants [J]. Guihaia, 2017, 37(3): 315-321. [胡小丽, 常朝阳, 杜彦君. 传粉方式和果实类型对木本植物繁殖物候的影响 [J]. 广西植物, 2017, 37(3): 315-321. doi: 10.11931/guihaia.Gxzw201605001.]
    [21] DETTO M, WRIGHT S J, CALDERÓN O, et al. Resource acquisition and reproductive strategies of tropical forest in response to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation [J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 913. doi: 10. 1038/s41467-018-03306-9.
    [22] ZOHNER C M, RENNER S S. Common garden comparison of the leaf-out phenology of woody species from different native climates, combined with herbarium records, forecasts long-term change [J]. Ecol Lett, 2014, 17(8): 1016-1025. doi: 10.1111/ele.12308.
    [23] ZOHNER C M, RENNER S S. Innately shorter vegetation periods in North American species explain native-non-native phenological asymmetries [J]. Nat Ecol Evol, 2017, 1(11): 1655-1660. doi: 10.1038/s415 59-017-0307-3.
    [24] LIU J J, YU M J, TOMLINSON K, et al. Patterns and drivers of plant biodiversity in Chinese university campuses [J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2017, 164: 64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.008.
    [25] PAUTASSO M, PARMENTIER I. Are the living collections of the world’s botanical gardens following species-richness patterns observed in natural ecosystems? [J]. Bot Helv, 2007, 117(1): 15-28. doi: 10. 1007/s00035-007-0786-y.
    [26] FAEGRI K, VAN DER PIJL L. The Principles of Pollination Ecology [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979: 248.
    [27] R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [R]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021.
    [28] XU G X, LUO S X, GUO Q S, et al. Responses of leaf unfolding and flowering to climate change in 12 tropical evergreen broadleaf tree species in Jianfengling, Hainan Island [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38 (6): 585-598. [许格希, 罗水兴, 郭泉水, 等. 海南岛尖峰岭12种热带常绿阔叶乔木展叶期与开花期对气候变化的响应 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 585-598. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00054.]
    [29] BHAT D M. Phenology of tree species of tropical moist forest of Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka, India [J]. J Biosci, 1992, 17(3): 325-352. doi: 10.1007/BF02703158.
    [30] NEIL K, WU J G. Effects of urbanization on plant flowering phenology: A review [J]. Urban Ecosyst, 2006, 9(3): 243-257. doi: 10.1007/s112 52-006-9354-2.
    [31] HEYDEL F, TACKENBERG O. How are the phenologies of ripening and seed release affected by species’ ecology and evolution? [J]. Oikos, 2017, 126(5): 738-747. doi: 10.5061/dryad.4rv4v.
    [32] PRIMACK R B, LAUBE J, GALLINAT A S, et al. From observations to experiments in phenology research: Investigating climate change impacts on trees and shrubs using dormant twigs [J]. Ann Bot, 2015, 116(6): 889-897. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv032.
    [33] ZOHNER C M, BENITO B M, FRIDLEY J D, et al. Spring predict-tability explains different leaf-out strategies in the woody floras of North America, Europe and East Asia [J]. Ecol Lett, 2017, 20(4): 452-460. doi: 10.1111/ele.12746.
    [34] LIU Z G, LI K, CAI Y L, et al. Correlations between leafing phenology and traits: Woody species of evergreen broad-leaved forests in subtropical China [J]. Pol J Ecol, 2011, 59(3): 463-473.
    [35] WANG Y, YANG X D, ALI A, et al. Flowering phenology shifts in response to functional traits, growth form, and phylogeny of woody species in a desert area [J]. Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11: 536. doi: 10. 3389/fpls.2020.00536.
    [36] JIA P, BAYAERTA T, LI X Q, et al. Relationships between flowering phenology and functional traits in eastern Xizang alpine meadow [J]. Arct Antarct Alp Res, 2011, 43(4): 585-592.
    [37] POLGAR C, GALLINAT A, PRIMACK R B. Drivers of leaf-out phenology and their implications for species invasions: Insights from Thoreau’s Concord [J]. New Phytol, 2014, 202(1): 106-115. doi: 10. 1111/nph.12647.
    [38] ZIMMERMAN J K, WRIGHT S J, CALDERÓN O, et al. Flowering and fruiting phenologies of seasonal and aseasonal neotropical forests: The role of annual changes in irradiance [J]. J Trop Ecol, 2007, 23(2): 231-251. doi: 10.1017/S0266467406003890.
    [39] DE CAMARGO M G G, DE CARVALHO G H, DE COSTA ALBERTON B, et al. Leafing patterns and leaf exchange strategies of a cerrado woody community [J]. Biotropica, 2018, 50(3): 442-454. doi: 10.1111/ btp.12552.
    [40] CALLE Z, SCHLUMPBERGER B O, PIEDRAHITA L, et al. Seasonal variation in daily insolation induces synchronous bud break and flowering in the tropics [J]. Trees, 2010, 24(5): 865-877. doi: 10.1007/ s00468-010-0456-3.
    [41] ZHAO J B, ZHANG Y P, SONG F Q, et al. Phenological response of tropical plants to regional climate change in Xishuangbanna, south-western China [J]. J Trop Ecol, 2013, 29(2): 161-172. doi: 10.1017/ S0266467413000114.
    [42] CRONE E E, RAPP J M. Resource depletion, pollen coupling, and the ecology of mast seeding [J]. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2014, 1322(1): 21-34. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12465.
    [43] SCHAUBER E M, KELLY D, TURCHIN P, et al. Masting by eighteen New Zealand plant species: The role of temperature as a synchronizing cue [J]. Ecology, 2002, 83(5): 1214-1225. doi: 10.2307/3071937.
    [44] DUNHAM A E, RAZAFINDRATSIMA O H, RAKOTONIRINA P, et al. Fruiting phenology is linked to rainfall variability in a tropical rain forest [J]. Biotropica, 2018, 50(3): 396-404. doi: 10.1111/btp.12564.
    [45] CHAPMAN C A, CHAPMAN L J, STRUHSAKER T T, et al. A long-term evaluation of fruiting phenology: Importance of climate change [J]. J Trop Ecol, 2005, 21(1): 31-45. doi: 10.1017/S0266467404001 993.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

薛乾怀,陈沁,唐欣然,王鑫洋,杜彦君.大学校园植物物候格局及其气候驱动因子研究——以海南大学为例[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(3):339~348

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:125
  • PDF: 3357
  • HTML: 3213
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:December 01,2022
  • Revised:February 17,2023
  • Online: June 04,2024
Article QR Code