Home > Archive>Volume 32, Issue 1, 2024 >111-117. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4738
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Light Response Characteristics of Ash in Ardisia giantifolia and Its Correlation with Growth Indexes
Author:
  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [33]
    • |
  • Related
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the effect of light on ash accumulation of Ardisia giantifolia, four light intensities (100%, 60%, 40% and 20% natural light intensity) and four light qualities (green, white, blue and red light) were set by using sunshade net and film, the response characteristics of height, basal diameter and biomass of A. giantifolia under different treatment conditions was analyzed, and the relationship between ash content and growth indexes was studied. The results showed that with the weakening of light intensity, the ash content of A. giantifolia decreased under green light with the decrease of light intensity, showing a “low-high-low-high” change trend under white light. Moreover, there was no significant change under blue light or red light. The ash content of A. giantifolia was the lowest under white light and 100% light intensity, showing significantly differences with that of the rest light intensity. At 60%, 40% and 20% natural light intensity, light quality had no significant effect on ash content of A. giantifolia. The ash content had no significant correlation with plant height, basal diameter and biomass of A. giantifolia. With the decrease of light intensity, the plant height, basal diameter and biomass of A. giantifolia increase, and reach maximum under white light. Therefore, it was suggested that light had effect on ash accumulation and growth index of A. giantifolia, and it was necessary to choose the forest type with proper shade intensity or canopy density when planting.

    Reference
    [1] ZHOU Z J. Growth and ecophysiological characteristics of Ardisia gigantifolia under the compound planting of forest and medicine[D]. Beijing: Minzu University of China, 2020.[周泽建. 林药复合种植走马胎植物生长与生理生态特性[D]. 北京: 中央民族大学, 2020.]
    [2] WEI R. The influence of environmental factors on contents of biomass and saponins of Ardisia gigantifolia[D]. Guangzhou: Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2017.[魏蓉. 环境因子对走马胎生物量及皂苷含量的影响[D]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2017.]
    [3] LI K, MIAO C, LIU J, et al. Effects of LED light quality on growth, physiology and active component contents of Ardisia gigantifolia[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2022, 42(5): 819-828.[李坤, 毛纯, 刘军, 等. LED光质对走马胎生长和生理及活性成分含量的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42(5): 819-828. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2022. 05.0819.]
    [4] LI Z, XIE S Q, XU W G, et al. Steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic performance in the shade-demanding plant Amorphophallus xiei under different levels of growth irradiance[J]. Guihaia, 2016, 36(5): 529-538.[李珍, 谢世清, 徐文果, 等. 不同光照条件下喜阴植物谢君魔芋对稳态和动态光源的响应特征[J]. 广西植物, 2016, 36(5): 529-538. doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201412012.]
    [5] ZHAO B, FU N F, XIANG Y C, et al. Effects of light intensity and planting substrates on the growth of Begonia ningmingensis ‘Ningming Silver’, a new begonia cultivar[J]. Guihaia, 2017, 37(9): 1153-1160.[赵斌, 付乃峰, 向言词, 等. 光照强度及栽培基质对秋海棠新品种‘宁明银’生长的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2017, 37(9): 1153-1160. doi: 10. 11931/guihaia.gxzw201610033.]
    [6] State Pharmacopoeia Committee of China. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, Volume II[M]. Beijing: Chinese Medicine Publishing House, 2015: 200-300.[国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典, 二部[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015: 200-300.]
    [7] LI Y. The quality performance of Gentiana crassicaulis Duthie ex Burk. in Lijiang City and the correlation with rhizosphere soil research[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015.[李瑶. 丽江秦艽主要质量指标及其与根际土壤养分特性的相关性研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2015.]
    [8] LIU X X. Research on the effects of different light quality supplemental light on the growth, quality and volatile components of peppermint based on the fish-flower closed-loop symbiosis system[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2021.[柳璇璇. 基于渔-花闭环共生系统中不同光质补光对薄荷生长、品质及挥发性组分的影响研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2021.]
    [9] ZHENG D H, YUAN S N, CHEN J M, et al. Effects of different shading treatments on the extractives, total flavonoids and ashes of root in Elephantopus scaber Linn.[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2016, 37(1): 15-19.[郑定华, 袁淑娜, 陈俊明, 等. 遮光对地胆草根系浸出物及黄酮和灰分含量影响研究初报[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(1): 15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2016.01.003.]
    [10] HOU J L. Study on the effect of weak light stress on the quality of Glycyrrhiza uralensis[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 2010.[侯俊玲. 弱光胁迫对甘草质量影响的研究[D]. 北京: 北京中医药大学, 2010.]
    [11] MAO F F. Forest Environment[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2006: 24-39.[毛芳芳. 森林环境[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006: 24-39.]
    [12] ZHU Y L, ZHOU G, ZHANG H F, et al. Study on calorific value and ash content of Populus tremula[J]. For Environ Sci, 2022, 38(2): 79-87.[朱雅丽, 周钢, 张绘芳, 等. 欧洲山杨热值及灰分含量研究[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2022, 38(2): 79-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427. 2022.02.010.]
    [13] HAO C Y, LIU P. The caloric value of the dominant plant species of a Heptacodium miconioides forest at Bei Mountain, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26(6): 1709-1717.[郝朝运, 刘鹏. 浙江北山七子花群落主要植物叶热值[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(6): 1709-1717. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.06.010.]
    [14] WANG G, LUO J X, PU S R, et al. Effects of shading on the active component 10-DAB and mineral nutrient accumulation of Taxus madia×T. Yunnanensis Yunman[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2022, 38(11): 175-184.[王刚, 罗建勋, 蒲尚饶, 等. 遮荫对云曼红豆杉活性成分10-DAB及矿质营养累积的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(11): 175-184. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-0353.]
    [15] FANG X K, CHEN Z W, CHENG Z K, et al. Effects of reduced solar radiation on photosynthetic physiological characteristics and accumulation of secondary and micro elements in paddy rice[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32(4): 1345-1351.[方笑堃, 陈志炜, 程兆康, 等. 太阳辐射减弱对水稻光合生理特性和中微量元素积累的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1345-1351. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202104.030.]
    [16] ZHANG J L, LI H R, GUO S Y, et al. Research advances in higher plant adaptation to salt stress[J]. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2015, 24(12): 220-236.[张金林, 李惠茹, 郭姝媛, 等. 高等植物适应盐逆境研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 220-236. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015233.]
    [17] ZHU J, FAN Y, OUYANG Y Y, et al. Effects of aluminum stress on the absorption and transportation of microelement in the roots and leaves of Aleurites montana[J]. J For Environ, 2021, 41(3): 234-241.[朱静, 樊月, 欧阳玉莹, 等. 铝胁迫对千年桐吸收和运输微量元素的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2021, 41(3): 234-241. doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf. 2021.03.002.]
    [18] HUI C Y, SHI S, FENG J C, et al. Analysis on the content and stoichiometry of 15 nutrient elements of zonal Stipa plants in Inner Mongolia[J]. J Yunnan Univ (Nat Sci), 2019, 41(2): 380-389.[惠岑怿, 石莎, 冯金朝, 等. 内蒙古地带性针茅植物15种营养元素含量及化学计量特征分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(2): 380-389. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20180077.]
    [19] WANG M, JIANG W J, YU H J. Effect of low light stress on plant physiology and its control measures[J]. J Inner Mongolia Agric Univ, 2007, 28(3): 198-203.[王明, 蒋卫杰, 余宏军. 弱光逆境对植株生理特性的影响及其调控措施[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2007, 28(3): 198-203. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3575.2007.03.046.]
    [20] LIN J, LIANG Z Y, ZHAO Z, et al. Effects of different light transmittance and growth regulator concentrations on Panax notoginseng [J]. J Henan Agric Sci, 2021, 50(1): 60-67.[林洁, 梁增艳, 赵致, 等. 不同透光率和生长调节剂浓度对三七的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(1): 60-67. doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2021.01.008.]
    [21] ZHU Z X, BAO W Y, JIANG L B, et al. Effects of Pinellia ternate- corn intercropping on growth and medicinal quality of Pinellia ternata[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2020, 39(5): 85-92.[朱振兴, 包婉玉, 江林波, 等. 半夏间作玉米对半夏生长及药材质量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(5): 85-92. doi: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2020.05.012.]
    [22] ZHOU C B, LIU W K, SHAO M J, et al. Effects of white vs. red/blue LED light of different intensity on the growth and nutrient element content of Hydroponic Lettuce[J]. J Agric Sci Technol, 2021, 23(12): 76-83.[周成波, 刘文科, 邵明杰, 等. 不同光强的LED白光与红蓝光对生菜生长及营养元素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 76-83. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0842.]
    [23] ZHANG H Y, HU Q X, ZOU Y J, et al. Effects of light on growth and nutritional quality of Pleurotus eryngii fruit body[J]. Acta Edulis Fungi, 2019, 26(3): 65-72.[张惠颖, 胡清秀, 邹亚杰, 等. 光质对刺芹侧耳子实体生长发育及营养品质的影响[J]. 食用菌学报, 2019, 26(3): 65-72. doi: 10.16488/j.cnki.1005-9873.2019.03.008.]
    [24] CHEN G, ZHAN Y, LUO Y, et al. Effect of different LED light qualities on growth and development of Tremella fuciformis[J]. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2016, 37(23): 156-160.[陈岗, 詹永, 罗杨, 等. 不同LED光质对银耳生长发育的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, 37(23): 156-160. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.23.021.]
    [25] HUA J S, DAI H Y, XIA M Z. Effects of different light intensity on photosynthetic characteristic and yield characters of kidney bean[J]. Acta Agric Boreali-occid Sin, 2009, 18(2): 136-140.[华劲松, 戴红燕, 夏明忠. 不同光照强度对芸豆光合特性及产量性状的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(2): 136-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389. 2009.02.030.]
    [26] XUE Q, CHEN B, YANG X M, et al. Biomass allocation, water use characteristics, and photosynthetic light response of four Commeli- naceae plants under different light intensities[J]. Acta Pratacul Sin, 2022, 31(1): 69-80.[薛晴, 陈斌, 杨小梅, 等. 不同光强下4种鸭跖草科植物的生物量分配、水分生理及光响应特征[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(1): 69-80. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021250.]
    [27] LIU Y, CHEN P, ZHOU M M, et al. Effects of light quality on biomass and triterpenoid accumulation in leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus from different families[J]. J Zhejiang A & F Univ, 2020, 37(6): 1097-1104.[刘洋, 陈培, 周明明, 等. 光质对不同家系青钱柳生物量和叶三萜类化合物积累的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(6): 1097-1104. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200117.]
    [28] WANG T T, ZHAN Z, MA J, et al. Effects of different light qualities on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Bletilla striata seedlings in vitro[J]. Guihaia, 2021, 41(4): 584-590.[王婷婷, 占卓, 马健, 等. 不同光质对白及组培苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2021, 41(4): 584-590. doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201906031.]
    [29] SHI J, YANG H Y, WU W L, et al. Effects of different light quality on the growth and physiological characteristics of blueberry[J]. N Hort, 2022(6): 15-23.[施杰, 杨海燕, 吴文龙, 等. 不同光质对蓝莓生长发育及生理特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(6): 15-23. doi: 10. 11937/bfyy.20213160.]
    [30] CHENG X Y, YANG Z L, YANG X, et al. Effects of light quality on the growth and content of active ingredients of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum [J]. For Res, 2018, 31(5): 98-103.[程小燕, 杨志玲, 杨旭, 等. 不同光质对三叶崖爬藤生长及有效成分含量的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(5): 98-103. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.05.013.]
    [31] XIONG J, WANG C, XING W L, et al. Morphological and physiological responses of Ardisia crenata seedlings under different light intensities[J]. Plant Sci J, 2018, 36(5): 736-744.[熊静, 王臣, 邢文黎, 等. 朱砂根幼苗在不同光照强度下的形态和生理响应[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018, 36(5): 736-744. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.50736.]
    [32] WANG G F, ZHANG W P, ZHANG Q, et al. Comparison of growth characteristics of two varieties of white clover under different light and water conditions[J]. Acta Agric Sin, 2020, 28(5): 1301-1310.[王国芳, 张吴平, 张茜, 等. 不同光照与水分条件下2种白三叶生长特性比较[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1301-1310. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.015.]
    [33] SHUANG S P, ZHANG J Y, CUN Z, et al. Ecophysiological charac- teristics of a typically shade-tolerant species Panax notoginseng in response to different light intensities[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(9): 3596-3612.[双升普, 张金燕, 寸竹, 等. 光照强度驱动典型阴生植物三七的生理生态响应特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(9): 3596-3612. doi: 10.5846/stxb202104090918
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

周泽建,冯金朝.走马胎灰分对光的响应特征及其与生长指标的相关性[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(1):111~117

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:119
  • PDF: 452
  • HTML: 384
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:October 20,2022
  • Online: January 26,2024
  • Published: January 20,2024
Article QR Code
You are the first4639989 Visitors
Governing Body：中国科学院
Organizer：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
Address：Xingke Road 723,Tianhe District,Guangzhou,China
Phone：+86 (0)20-3725 2514
Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany ® 2025 All Rights Reserved