Home > Archive>Volume 32, Issue 1, 2024 >75-81. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4696
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Soil Seed Bank Characteristic of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis Plantations in Lower Subtropical China
Author:
  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [30]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the characteristics of soil seed bank in Eucalyptus plantations, the storage, vertical distribution and similarity of seed bank in E. urophylla×E. grandis plantations with different age were analyzed. The results showed that the active soil seed storage of 1-2-year-old E. urophylla×E. grandis plantations were the highest, which was significantly higher than other plantations, followed by 3-4-year-old E. urophylla×E. grandis and Pinus massoniana plantation, and that of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation was the lowest, which was significantly lower than other plantations. The soil seed bank storage of E. urophylla×E. grandis plantations decreased rapidly along the stand age. The most abundant plant species in soil seed bank were mixed forest and P. massoniana plantation, which were significantly larger than other plantations. In E. urophylla×E. grandis plantations, the number of plant species in soil seed bank increased at first and then decreased with the increase of stand age. Among all forest types, the seed bank density of 0-5 cm soil layer was significantly higher than that of 5-10 cm soil layer. The co-existed specie number of seed banks and understory in the mixed forest was the largest, followed by P. massoniana plantation and the least was C. lanceolata plantation. With the increase of stand age, the number of coexisting plant species in E. urophylla×E. grandis plantation also increased at first and then decreased. The soil seed bank similarity coefficients of Jaccard (CJ) and Sorensen (CS) of E. urophylla×E. grandis plantations were increased at first and then decreased along stand age. Therefore, appropriate interplanting (retention) of native tree species in the management of fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations could increase the biodiversity and stability of ecological functions of forest ecosystems.

    Reference
    [1] MING A G, LIU S R, LI H, et al. Effects of close-to-nature transformation on biomass and its allocation in Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(23): 7833-7842.[明安刚, 刘世荣, 李华, 等. 近自然化改造对马尾松和杉木人工林生物量及其分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(23): 7833-7842. doi: 10.5846/stxb201704030573.]
    [2] LUO Y H, SUN D J, LIN J Y, et al. Effect of close-to-nature management on the natural regeneration and species diversity in a masson pine plantation[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(19): 6154-6162.[罗应华, 孙冬婧, 林建勇, 等. 马尾松人工林近自然化改造对植物自然更新及物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19): 6154-6162. doi: 10.5846/stxb201306101601.]
    [3] BAROT S, GIGNOUX J, MENAUT J C. Seed shadows, survival and recruitment: How simple mechanisms lead to dynamics of population recruitment curves[J]. Oikos, 1999, 86(2): 320-330. doi: 10.2307/3546449.
    [4] WANG J, HUI D F, REN H, et al. Effects of understory vegetation and litter on plant nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), N:P ratio and their relationships with growth rate of indigenous seedlings in subtropical plantations[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e84130. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0084130.
    [5] HAN F R, FENG Y L, FENG J C. Biodiversity and sustainable development of Eucalyptus plantation[J]. S China Agric, 2016, 10(21): 124-125.[韩富任, 冯亚磊, 冯金朝. 桉树人工林生物多样性及可持续发展[J]. 南方农业, 2016, 10(21): 124-125. doi: 10.19415/j.cnki. 1673-890x.2016.21.075.]
    [6] WANG K L, YUE Y M, MA Z L, et al. Research and demonstration on technologies for rocky desertification treatment and ecosystem services enhancement in karst peak-cluster depression regions[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(22): 7098-7102.[王克林, 岳跃民, 马祖陆, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地石漠化治理与生态服务提升技术研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7098-7102. doi: 10.5846/stxb201610072003.]
    [7] JACCARD P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone[J]. New Phytol, 1912, 11(2): 37-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x.
    [8] WANG B S, PENG S L. Vegetation Ecology: Communities and Ecosystems[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1997: 3-124.[王伯荪, 彭少麟. 植被生态学: 群落与生态系统[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1997: 3-124.]
    [9] LIU J M, ZHOU C, MENG Z Y, et al. Seed bank in a planted forest of Pinus massoniana land of different age-class[J]. J SW Univ (Nat Sci), 2007, 29(6): 68-72.[刘济明, 周超, 蒙朝阳, 等. 不同龄级马尾松人工林土壤种子库研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(6): 68-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2007.06.015.]
    [10] ZHANG Y Y, ZHOU Q H, XU J Y, et al. Effects of forest ages on the diversity of understory plants and soil seed bank of Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2021, 30(11): 2121-2129.[张洋洋, 周清慧, 许骄阳, 等. 林龄对马尾松人工林林下植物与土壤种子库多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(11): 2121-2129. doi: 10. 16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.11.002.]
    [11] ZHU C X, LIU Z G, WANG C H, et al. Characteristics of soil seed bank and its relationship with aboveground vegetation: A case study of Chinese fir plantations in Sanming City, Fujian Province[J]. China Environ Sci, 2019, 39(10): 4416-4423.[朱晨曦, 刘志刚, 王昌辉, 等. 土壤种子库特征及与地上植被的关系——以福建省三明市杉木人工林为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(10): 4416-4423. doi: 10. 19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2019.0515.]
    [12] LIU S L, SONG G, LIU M, et al. The characteristics of soil seed bank and natural regeneration of Pinus densiflora plantation in Zhanggutai Sandyland[J]. Prot For Sci Technol, 2014(9): 4-6.[刘淑玲, 宋鸽, 刘敏, 等. 章古台沙地赤松人工林土壤种子库及天然更新特征[J]. 防护林科技, 2014(9): 4-6. doi: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2014.09. 002.]
    [13] YU Z Q, LIU J L, YANG T T, et al. Seed rain and soil seed bank of Platycladus orientalis plantation in Weibei Loess Plateau[J]. J NW Agric For Univ (Nat Sci), 2014, 42(6): 85-92.[于泽群, 刘金良, 杨婷婷, 等. 渭北黄土高原侧柏人工林种子雨和种子库研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(6): 85-92. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2014.06.004.]
    [14] CHEN Y, LIU H J, ZHANG J F, et al. Soil seed bank characteristics preliminary comparison between plantation and natural forest of Betula alnoides[J]. For Invent Plann, 2013, 38(2): 20-26.[陈勇, 刘海姣, 张劲峰, 等. 西南桦人工林与天然林土壤种子库特征初步比较[J]. 林业调查规划, 2013, 38(2): 20-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168. 2013. 02.004.]
    [15] TANG Q L, ZHU Y L, ZHANG Z Y, et al. The study on the soil seed bank of Eucalyptus plantation[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2012, 28(1): 12-16.[唐庆兰, 朱宇林, 张照远, 等. 桉树人工林土壤种子库研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(1): 12-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.01.003.]
    [16] ZHU Y L, TANG Q L, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Characteristics of soil seed banks in different Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis forest types[J]. Chin J Trop Crop, 2012, 33(3): 572-577.[朱宇林, 唐庆兰, 张照远, 等. 不同类型桉树人工林土壤种子库特征研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(3): 572-577. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2012.03.033.]
    [17] WEN Y G, LIU S R, CHEN F, et al. Plant diversity and dynamics in industrial plantations of Eucalyptus[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2005, 27(4): 17-22.[温远光, 刘世荣, 陈放, 等. 桉树工业人工林植物物种多样性及动态研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27(4): 17-22. doi: 10. 3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2005.04.004.]
    [18] LIU P, QIN J, LIU J C, et al. Comparison of structure and species diversity of Eucalyptus community[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31(8): 2227-2235.[刘平, 秦晶, 刘建昌, 等. 桉树人工林物种多样性变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8): 2227-2235.]
    [19] YU Y Y, LIAO B Y, CHENG F, et al. Effects of different tending measures on growth dynamics of Eucalyptus urophylla×Eucalyptus grandis plantation and variation of vegetation diversity under forest[J]. J SW For Univ, 2018, 38(5): 58-64.[于洋洋, 廖博一, 程飞, 等. 不同抚育措施对尾巨桉人工林生长动态及其林下植被多样性的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2018, 38(5): 58-64. doi: 10.11929/j.issn. 2095-1914.2018.05.010.]
    [20] MA Q, ZHOU X G, LIANG H W, et al. Effects of different management measures on plant diversity in Eucalyptus plantations[J]. Guangxi Sci, 2017, 24(2): 182-187.[马倩, 周晓果, 梁宏温, 等. 不同经营措施对桉树人工林植物多样性的影响[J]. 广西科学, 2017, 24(2): 182-187. doi: 10.13656/j.cnki. gxkx.20170124.004.]
    [21] HAO J F, WANG D Y, TANG Y B, et al. Effects of human disturbance on species diversity of Pinus massoniana plantation in Jiangyou District, Sichuan Province[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2014, 23(5): 729-735.[郝建锋, 王德艺, 唐永彬, 等. 人为干扰对江油地区马尾松人工林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(5): 729-735. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.05.001.]
    [22] WEN Y G, YAN Y H, TAO Y L, et al. Effects of different ground clearance and fertilizing treatments on plant diversity of Eucalyptus plantations in subtropical China[J]. Guangxi Sci, 2018, 25(2): 117-127.[温远光, 严宇航, 陶彦良, 等. 不同林地清理和培肥措施对桉树人工林植物多样性的影响[J]. 广西科学, 2018, 25(2): 117-127. doi: 10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20180504.001.]
    [23] REN H, SHEN W J, LU H F, et al. Degraded ecosystems in China: Status, causes, and restoration efforts[J]. Landscape Ecol Eng, 2007, 3(1): 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11355-006-0018-4.
    [24] YANG Y J, SUN X Y, WANG P P. Forest soil seed bank and natural regeneration[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2001, 12(2): 304-308.[杨跃军, 孙向阳, 王保平. 森林土壤种子库与天然更新[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(2): 304-308.]
    [25] LU C H, YUAN L. Effect of dry-fruit eating birds to seed dispersal[J]. Chin J Ecol, 1997, 16(5): 44-47.[鲁长虎, 袁力. 食干果鸟对种子传播的作用[J]. 生态学杂志, 1997, 16(5): 44-47.]
    [26] KANG H B, WANG D X, CHANG M J, et al. Selection mechanism of rodents on the removal and predation microhabitats of seeds from different tree species[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(22): 7604-7613.[康海斌, 王得祥, 常明捷, 等. 啮齿动物对不同林木种子的搬运和取食微生境选择机制[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(22): 7604-7613. doi: 10.5846/stxb201609171871.]
    [27] HUO X Y, KANG H B, WANG D X, et al. Effects of rodents on seed dispersal patterns of constructive species in the pine-oak mixed forests of the Qinling Mountains, Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(7): 2435-2443.[霍雪莹, 康海斌, 王得祥, 等. 啮齿动物对秦岭松栎混交林建群种种子扩散格局的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2435-2443. doi: 10.5846/stxb201804140859.]
    [28] SHI N, MA J Z, JIANG Q C, et al. Species diversity of five plantation communities in Toutang Small Watershed of Jinsha River[J]. For Eng, 2021, 37(3): 44-51.[师楠, 马建忠, 江期川, 等. 金沙江头塘小流域5种人工林种子库研究[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(3): 44-51. doi: 10. 3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2021.03.006.]
    [29] GUO S S, LIU L, LI Y L, et al. Soil seed bank of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations and natural Pinus tabulaeformis forests at different slope positions in northern Hebei mountainous regions[J]. J Agric Univ Hebei, 2013, 36(3): 55-60.[郭耸松, 刘琳, 李玉灵, 等. 冀北山地华北落叶松人工林和油松天然林不同坡位土壤种子库研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2013, 36(3): 55-60. doi: 10.13320/j.cnki. jauh.2013.03.011.]
    [30] REN H, LI Z A, SHEN W J, et al. Changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function during the restoration of a tropical forest in south China[J]. Sci China Ser C Life Sci, 2007, 50(2): 277-284. doi: 10. 1007/s11427-007-0028-y.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

段文军,李达,李冲.南亚热带尾巨桉人工林土壤种子库特征研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(1):75~81

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:148
  • PDF: 410
  • HTML: 248
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 04,2022
  • Online: January 26,2024
  • Published: January 20,2024
Article QR Code
You are the first4641822 Visitors
Governing Body：中国科学院
Organizer：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
Address：Xingke Road 723,Tianhe District,Guangzhou,China
Phone：+86 (0)20-3725 2514
Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany ® 2025 All Rights Reserved