Introduction Cultivation and Comprehensive Evaluation of Tulip Varieties in Shanghai
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [31]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The aim was to establish an evaluation system to screen tulip varieties with good growth adaptability and high ornamental value, which are suitable for landscape application. Twenty-nine imported varieties of Tulipa gesneriana were introduced and planted in Shanghai, the phenological period, 12 growth characteristics (plant height, plant width, etc.), and 32 ornamental characteristics (flower uniformity, flower type, flower color, etc.) were observed and measured. From all observed characteristics, 27 evaluation indexes (flowering uniformity, flower color, flower color uniformity, etc.) were further chosen to establish a comprehensive evaluation system based on AHP (analytical hierarchy process) and GRA (grey relation analysis). The results showed that 29 varieties could be divided into 4 grades according the comprehensive evaluation, grade I included 10 varieties, grade II had 12 varieties, grade III and IV only 4 and 3 varieties, respectively. The varieties in grade I and II generally possessed high ornamental value and strong adaptability, which were suitable for popularization and application in landscaping in Shanghai and surrounding areas in the future. These had an important guide in screening suitable tulip varieties for gardens in Shanghai and surrounding areas. The established evaluation system also has a positive reference significance for evaluating the application of other tulip varieties in landscape.

    Reference
    [1] LI R H, YANG Q S, ZHANG H R, et al. A study on introducing some cultivars of Tulipa gesneriana[J]. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 1987, 2(3):99-106.[李瑞华, 杨秋生, 张宏若, 等. 郁金香引种研究[J]. 华北农学报, 1987, 2(3):99-106. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1987.03. 018.]
    [2] SONG X M, LIAO Y Z, CHEN P, et al. Experimental study on intro-duction and cultivation of tulip in Nanchang, Jiangxi[J]. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2013, 25(5):38-41.[宋小民, 廖元柱, 陈萍, 等. 江西南昌郁金香引种栽培试验研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2013, 25(5):38-41. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581. 2013.05.011.]
    [3] SHEN Q, CHEN Y P, SHI Y M. Study on adaptabilities of tulips introduced from the Netherlands[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Agric Sci), 2006, 24(2):168-176.[沈强, 陈亚平, 史益敏. 上海地区郁金香引种与物候期观察[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2006, 24(2):168-176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9964.2006.02.012.]
    [4] HAN H J, WANG X D, ZHANG H Y, et al. Study on cultivar screening of potted Tulips in Harbin city[J]. Territ Nat Resour Study, 2011, 33(5):64-66.[韩红娟, 王晓冬, 张华艳, 等. 哈尔滨市郁金香盆栽品种筛选试验研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2011, 33(5):64-66. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7853.2011.05.026.]
    [5] HU X Y, LEI J J, YANG Y G. Study on the introduction and experiment in Tulip cultivation[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2006, 34(18):4568-4570.[胡新颖, 雷家军, 杨永刚. 郁金香引种栽培研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(18):4568-4570. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2006.18.034.]
    [6] SU H. Practical technology of Tulips planting in Xinjiang[J]. Mod Landscape Archit, 2014, 11(8):39-41.[苏华. 郁金香在新疆种植的实用技术[J]. 现代园林, 2014, 11(8):39-41.]
    [7] FENG P B. The ornamental appraisal on introduction of perennial flowers Shanghai areas and studies on heat and cold resistance[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2003.[封培波. 上海地区引种宿根花卉观赏性评价及耐热、抗寒研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2003.]
    [8] YI Y J, YUAN W J, DONG M F, et al. Applying AHP to appraise Osmanthus fragrans cultivars in Henan Province[J]. J Henan Univ (Nat Sci), 2004, 34(4):23-29.[伊艳杰, 袁王俊, 董美芳, 等. 运用AHP法综合评价河南部分桂花品种[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 34(4):23-29. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1003-4978.2004.04.016.]
    [9] HUANG X F, LIU H X, JIN Y Q, et al. The research of ornamental characteristics evaluation of Dianthus caryophyllus[J]. J Nanjing Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2012, 35(4):84-89.[黄雪方, 刘海霞, 金雅琴, 等. 香石竹观赏性评价研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2012, 35(4):84-89.]
    [10] YANG Z, ZHANG X Q, LI X L, et al. Applying grey correlative degree analysis to comprehensively evaluate growth performance of 17 types of alfalfa with different fall-dormancy grades[J]. Acta Pratac Sin, 2009, 18(5):67-72.[杨曌, 张新全, 李向林, 等. 应用灰色关联度综合评价17个不同秋眠级苜蓿的生产性能[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5):67-72. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2009.05.010.]
    [11] DU S H, ZANG D K, SUN J W. Comprehensive evaluation on Chaenomeles ornamental cultivars by grey-relational grade method[J]. Shandong Agric Sci, 2011(1):12-15.[杜淑辉, 臧德奎, 孙居文. 木瓜属观赏品种的灰色关联度综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2011(1):12-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2011.01.004.]
    [12] GAO X L, LIAO W H, WANG S S, et al. Relationships among major agronomic traits and nutritional characters of pea based on correlation/grey relational analysis[J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5):56-60.[高小丽, 廖文华, 王姗姗, 等. 豌豆主要农艺和品质性状的相关性及灰色关联度分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, 32(5):56-60. doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.010.]
    [13] XIE Y, GUO S H. Grey correlation degree analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characters in Foxtail millet cultivars[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2021, 19(6):2064-2072.[解云, 郭世华. 谷子品种农艺性状的灰色关联度分析及综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(6):2064-2072. doi:10.13271/j.mpb.019.002064.]
    [14] WANG Y J, LIU S W, WANG C, et al. Evaluation on comprehensive performance of 12 Silage maize varieties by grey relational degree analysis[J]. Shandong Agric Sci, 2020, 52(10):78-82.[王玉建, 刘世伟, 王聪, 等. 应用灰色关联度法评价12个青贮玉米品种的综合性能[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):78-82. doi:10.14083/j.issn. 1001-4942.2020.10.012.]
    [15] MA B M. Application of grey relational degree analysis in evaluation of Osmanthus species[J]. J Fujian For Sci Technol, 2020, 47(2):106-108.[马炳美. 灰色关联度分析在桂花品种评价中的应用[J]. 福建林业科技, 2020, 47(2):106-108. doi:10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2020.02. 021.]
    [16] XIE W J, TANG Y W, SONG J, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Rhododendron varieties based on grey-relational grade method[J]. J Henan Agric Univ, 2017, 51(4):513-520.[解玮佳, 唐毓玮, 宋杰, 等. 基于灰色关联度分析法的高山杜鹃品种综合评价[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2017, 51(4):513-520. doi:10. 16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2017. 04.011.]
    [17] JIA Y, ZHAO J L, PAN Y Z, et al. Collection and evaluation of Primula species of western Sichuan in China[J]. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2014, 61(7):1245-1262. doi:10.1007/s10722-014-0108-3.
    [18] ZHANG B B, SHEN Z J, MA R J, et al. Grey relational analysis and fuzzy synthetic discrimination of antioxidant components in peach fruit[J]. Arch Biol Sci, 2018, 70(3):449-458. doi:10.2298/ABS171209005Z.
    [19] MIR S A, PADMA T. Evaluation and prioritization of rice production practices and constraints under temperate climatic conditions using Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP)[J]. Span J Agric Res, 2016, 14(4):e0909. doi:10.5424/sjar/2016144-8699.
    [20] ZHOU L, MU T H, MA M M, et al. Nutritional evaluation of different cultivars of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) from China by grey relational analysis (GRA) and its application in potato steamed bread making[J]. J Integr Agric, 2019, 18(1):231-245. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62137-9.
    [21] GAO X, LÜ T, ZANG F Q, et al. Classification of the Tulipa gesneriana L. common varieties in Beijing by numerical taxonomy[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2017, 15(7):2863-2873.[高星, 吕彤, 臧凤岐, 等. 北京地区郁金香常见品种的数量分类[J]. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15(7):2863-2873. doi:10.13271/j.mpb.015.002863.]
    [22] XIONG Y Y, XIA W T, WANG J, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and screening of tulip cultivars based on their ornamental value and reuse of bulbs[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2015, 37(1):107-114.[熊亚运, 夏文通, 王晶, 等. 基于观赏价值和种球再利用的郁金香品种综合评价与筛选[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(1):107-114. doi:10.13332/j. cnki.jbfu.2015.01.010.]
    [23] XING X Y, HAO P Y, LI G H, et al. Seasonal dynamic of plant phenol-phases in Beijing:A case study in Beijing Botanical Garden[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(9):906-916.[邢小艺, 郝培尧, 李冠衡, 等. 北京植物物候的季节动态特征——以北京植物园为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(9):906-916. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2018.0113.]
    [24] ZHU J Y, TANG D Q, LI X. Analysis of composition and content of anthoxanthins in petals of Freesia hybrid[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2021, 42(4):1136-1144.[朱佳意, 唐东芹, 李欣. 小苍兰花瓣花黄色素组成和含量分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(4):1136-1144. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.04.033.]
    [25] MOHANTY B K, SINGH N. Fuzzy relational equations in analytical hierarchy process[J]. Fuzzy Sets Syst, 1994, 63(1):11-9.
    [26] WANG H, WANG D A, FANG Z G, et al. A quality overall design approach for complex products by integrating fuzzy QFD and grey relational decision-making:A quality competitiveness perspective[J]. J Grey Syst, 2021, 33(1):59-73.
    [27] YANG B H, JIANG J M, ZHAO J S. Case-based classification model based on information diffusion and interval gray relational analysis[J]. Grey Syst Theory Appl, 2022, 12(1):174-196. doi:10.1108/GS-08-2020-0115.
    [28] KHALEGHI A, KHADIVI A, ZONNEVELD B J M. Morphological variations among and within species of wild tulip (Tulipa L.) from Iran[J]. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2018, 65(8):2241-2266. doi:10.1007/s 10722-018-0688-4.
    [29] XING G M, QU L W, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Collection and evaluation of wild tulip (Tulipa spp.) resources in China[J]. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2017, 64(4):641-652. doi:10.1007/s10722-017-0488-2.
    [30] ZONNEVELD B J M. The systematic value of nuclear genome size for "all" species of Tulipa L. (Liliaceae)[J]. Plant Syst Evol, 2009, 281(1/2/3/4):217-245. doi:10.1007/s00606-009-0203-7.
    [31] MA X H, TANG N, TANG D C, et al. Phenotypic genetic diversity and ornamental value comprehensive evaluation in tulip resources[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2021, 19(4):1320-1336.[马秀花, 唐楠, 唐道城, 等. 郁金香的表型遗传多样性及观赏价值综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(4):1320-1336. doi:10.13271/j. mpb.019.001320.]
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

张晗,过雪莹,沈强,唐东芹.上海地区郁金香引种栽培与品种综合评价[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2023,31(2):201~210

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 10,2021
  • Revised:March 07,2022
  • Online: March 31,2023
  • Published: March 20,2023
Article QR Code