Relationship Between Plant Diversity and Soil Factors of Typical Wetland Types in Guangfo Area
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [34]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the main factors of soil affecting wetland plant diversity, 18 sample plots were selected from 9 wetland types in Guangfo area. The wetland community species composition, plant diversity and soil factors were studied through field work and laboratory experiment. Furthermore, the correlations among community distribution, plant diversity and soil factors were analyzed by variance, canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). The results showed that there were 312 wetland species, belonging to 90 families and 198 genera, with Gramineae, Cyperaceae and Compositae as the dominant families. In addition, herbs are the most abundant in wetland plants, accounting for 79.17%. The principal component analysis showed that the level of soil nutrients in offshore and coastal wetlands was high. Moreover, the RDA analysis showed that soil factors with a great impact on plant diversity were soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium and alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen. From CCA, the main influencing factors of soil environmental factors on wetland herb community distribution are pH, available potassiumand available phosphorus. In conclusion, wetland ecosystem was more complex and fragile than terrestrial ecosystem, and the relationship between plant community and soil environmental factors was also more complex. The species distribution pattern, community diversity, community structure, soil conditions and their relationship of wetland vegetation are more obviously affected by the human disturbance.

    Reference
    [1] QU M, ZHANG C X, CHEN P. Present situation and development countermeasures of wetland parks in Pearl River delta area[J]. For Inv Plant, 2016, 41(3):59-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2016.03.014.屈明,张春霞,陈盼.珠江三角洲地区湿地公园建设现状及发展对策研究[J].林业调查规划, 2016, 41(3):59-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1671-3168.2016.03.014.
    [2] HAN D Y, YANG Y X, YANG Y, et al. Recent advances in wetland degradation research[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(4):1293-1307. doi:10.5846/stxb201012011707.韩大勇,杨永兴,杨杨,等.湿地退化研究进展[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(4):1293-1307. doi:10.5846/stxb201012011707.
    [3] ZHOU T, XIAN L J, XU S J. Spatial distribution of wetland parks and its influence factors in Pearl River Delta[J]. Wetl Sci, 2018, 16(6):707-716. doi:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2018.06.003.周婷,冼丽君,徐颂军.珠江三角洲湿地公园的空间分布特征及其影响因素分析[J].湿地科学, 2018, 16(6):707-716. doi:10.13248/j. cnki.wetlandsci.2018.06.003.
    [4] XIE H Y, GUO C X. Evaluation of Haizhu wetland ecosystem service value in Guangzhou[J]. Trop Geomorphol, 2018, 39(1):26-33.谢慧莹,郭程轩.广州海珠湿地生态系统服务价值评估[J].热带地貌, 2018, 39(1):26-33.
    [5] HUANG Y, MAO J Z, ZHAN H X, et al. Plant resources of Haizhu National Wetland Park, Guangzhou[J]. For Environ Sci, 2018, 34(5):81-85. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2018.05.015.黄燕,毛君竹,詹红星,等.广州海珠国家湿地公园植物资源研究[J].林业与环境科学, 2018, 34(5):81-85. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2018.05.015.
    [6] YAO R, ZENG X P, ZHANG X X, et al. Study on water sludge purification by aquatic plants in wetland of Guangzhou[J]. Chin Landsc Arch, 2018, 34(8):82-85. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018. 08.016.姚睿,曾小平,张潇潇,等.水生植物对广州湿地水体污泥的净化作用研究[J].中国园林, 2018, 34(8):82-85. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1000-6664.2018.08.016.
    [7] LI Q F, LI Z A, REN H, et al. The role of wetland plants and soils in decontamination of heavy metals[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2004, 12(3):273-279. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2004.03.016.李勤奋,李志安,任海,等.湿地系统中植物和土壤在治理重金属污染中的作用[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2004, 12(3):273-279. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2004.03.016.
    [8] XU S S, SUN G J, LIU H M, et al. The relationship between riparian vegetation and environmental factors in Heihe River Basin[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31(9):2421-2429.许莎莎,孙国钧,刘慧明,等.黑河河岸植被与环境因子间的相互作用[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(9):2421-2429.
    [9] LIU G C, HUANG Y X, WANG Q G, et al. Effects of environmental factors on plant species diversity:Research progress[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2018, 34(13):83-89.刘冠成,黄雅曦,王庆贵,等.环境因子对植物物种多样性的影响研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2018, 34(13):83-89.
    [10] TAN J D, KE H, ZHAO H J, et al. Research on application of urban greening plants of Foshan City[J]. J Foshan Univ (Nat Sci), 2017, 35(1):46-52. doi:10.13797/j.cnki.jfosu.1008-0171.2017.0008.谭家得,柯欢,赵鸿杰,等.佛山市城市绿地植物应用研究[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(1):46-52. doi:10.13797/j.cnki.jfosu.1008-0171.2017.0008.
    [11] CHEN P, HU Y H, QU M. Present situation and protection mana-gement countermeasures of wetland resources in Guangzhou[J]. For Inv Plant, 2017, 42(3):31-35. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2017.03.008.陈盼,胡喻华,屈明.广州市湿地资源现状及保护管理对策[J].林业调查规划, 2017, 42(3):31-35. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2017. 03.008.
    [12] NIU X J. Research progress on floral communities in constructed wetland in China[J]. Sichuan Environ, 2005, 24(5):45-47. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1001-3644.2005.05.014.牛晓君.我国人工湿地植物系统的研究进展[J].四川环境, 2005, 24(5):45-47. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3644.2005.05.014.
    [13] YUAN X C, ZHANG W W, WANG F G, et al. Current status and conservation strategies of wetland plants in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Plant Sci J, 2018, 36(2):211-220. doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.20211.袁晓初,张弯弯,王发国,等.广东省湿地维管植物资源现状及保护利用[J].植物科学学报, 2018, 36(2):211-220. doi:10.11913/PSJ. 2095-0837.2018.20211.
    [14] GUO Y N, SU F, WANG R J. Investigation and analysis on plants of wetland parks in Guangzhou[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2020, 28(6):607-614. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4178.郭亚男,苏凡,王瑞江.广州市湿地公园植物调查与分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(6):607-614. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4178.
    [15] LI E H, YANG C, CAI X B, et al. Plant diversity and protection measures in Honghu Wetland[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(3):623-635. doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202103010.厉恩华,杨超,蔡晓斌,等.洪湖湿地植物多样性与保护对策[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(3):623-635. doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj 202103010.
    [16] YUAN B D, XU N, CHEN J Y, et al. Investigation and study on plant communities in the dike of Xinli Lake National Wetland Park in Beizhen, Liaoning Province[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2021, 49(17):102-106. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.17.028.袁宝东,徐宁,陈继宇,等.辽宁北镇新立湖国家湿地公园湖塘堤坝植物群落调查研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(17):102-106. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.17.028.
    [17] XIE Y, XU Y F, YOU J R, et al. Species composition, flora and invasion hazard of alien plants in Huangjinhe National Wetland Park[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2020, 39(11):3613-3622. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890. 202011.005.谢勇,徐永福,游健荣,等.黄金河国家湿地公园外来植物种类组成、区系与入侵危害[J].生态学杂志, 2020, 39(11):3613-3622. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202011.005.
    [18] CHEN R B, ZHANG L, CHEN Z H, et al. Investigation and analysis of wetland vascular plants in Guangzhou area[J]. Ecol Sci, 2007, 26(4):311-318. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2007.04.005.陈锐彬,张丽,陈章和,等.广州地区湿地维管植物资源调查与分析[J].生态科学, 2007, 26(4):311-318. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2007.04.005.
    [19] ZHANG D D, CHEN B L, FENG Y J. Technical approach to ecolo-gical restoration of Guangzhou Haizhu National Wetland Park[J]. Wetl Sci Manag, 2016, 12(4):39-41. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2016. 04.10.张大达,陈本亮,冯永军.广州海珠国家湿地公园生态恢复技术初探[J].湿地科学与管理, 2016, 12(4):39-41. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1673-3290.2016.04.10.
    [20] WU Y B, FENG Z J. Rare and endangered plants and national key protected plants for ex situ conservation in South China Agricultural University arboretum[J]. J S China Agric Univ, 2006, 27(3):118-121. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2006.03.033.吴永彬,冯志坚.华南农业大学树木园稀有濒危植物和国家重点保护植物的迁地保护[J].华南农业大学学报, 2006, 27(3):118-121. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2006.03.033.
    [21] WANG C L. Study on degradation and restoration methods of mang-rove wetland:A case study on Guangdong Nansha Wetland Park mang-rove wetland and Zhanjiang mangrove wetland[J]. Art Sci Technol, 2019, 32(12):174, 176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2019. 12.117.王成林.红树林湿地的退化与修复方法研究——以广东南沙湿地公园红树林湿地以及湛江红树林湿地为例[J].艺术科技, 2019, 32(12):174, 176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2019.12.117.
    [22] ZHANG Q P, ZHANG L, ZHANG X, et al. Plant-diversity of urban wetland in Lanzhou[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2011, 39(34):21195-21197. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.34.102.张起鹏,张丽,张旭,等.兰州城市湿地植物多样性[J].安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(34):21195-21197. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011. 34.102.
    [23] XIAO D R, TIAN K, ZHANG L Q. Relationship between plant diversity and soil fertility in Napahai wetland of northwestern Yunnan Plateau[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2008, 28(7):3116-3124.肖德荣,田昆,张利权.滇西北高原纳帕海湿地植物多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(7):3116-3124.
    [24] LIU X M, ZHOU Z F, ZHANG H T, et al. Assessment of water quality and its spatial and temporal characteristics of rivers in karst mountain area based on principal component analysis:A case study on Zhangwei River in Guizhou Province[J]. Environ Eng, 2019, 37(10):49-54. doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.201910008.刘贤梅,周忠发,张昊天,等.基于主成分分析的喀斯特山区河流水质评价及水质时空特征分析:以贵州省张维河为例[J].环境工程, 2019, 37(10):49-54. doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.201910008.
    [25] BURNSIDE N G, JOYCE C B, PUURMANN E, et al. Use of vege-tation classification and plant indicators to assess grazing abandon-ment in Estonian coastal wetlands[J]. J Veg Sci, 2007, 18(5):645-654. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02578.x.
    [26] LI Y H, LI F D, MA W. Study on the features of plant diversity and its impact factors in the wetlands surrounding the Ebinur Lake[J]. Ecol Sci, 2016, 35(3):78-84. doi:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2016.03.012.李艳红,李发东,马雯.艾比湖湿地植物多样性特征及其影响因素研究[J].生态科学, 2016, 35(3):78-84. doi:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2016.03.012.
    [27] LUO Y, SU D R, JI B M, et al. Vegetation community characteristics of different meadows and their relationship with soil factors in Huihe Wetland[J]. Acta Pratacul Sin, 2018, 27(3):33-43. doi:10.11686/cyxb 2017184.罗琰,苏德荣,纪宝明,等.辉河湿地不同草甸植被群落特征及其与土壤因子的关系[J].草业学报, 2018, 27(3):33-43. doi:10. 11686/cyxb2017184.
    [28] LIU J J. Study on features of plant diversity and environmental factors in Danjiang Wetland[J]. SW China J Agric Sci, 2017, 30(12):2811-2819. doi:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2017.12.033.刘俊娟.丹江湿地植物多样性特征及其环境影响因素[J].西南农业学报, 2017, 30(12):2811-2819. doi:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2017.12. 033.
    [29] DONG L, XU L G, XU J X, et al. Effects of soil environmental factors on vegetation distribution in Shoaly wetlands typical to Poyang Lake[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2014, 51(3):618-626. doi:10.11766/trxb201307230347.董磊,徐力刚,许加星,等.鄱阳湖典型洲滩湿地土壤环境因子对植被分布影响研究[J].土壤学报, 2014, 51(3):618-626. doi:10. 11766/trxb201307230347.
    [30] TANG M Y, YANG Y X. Changes in vegetation and soil characteristics under tourism disturbance in lakeside wetland of northwest Yunnan plateau, southwest China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25(5):1283-1292. doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0096.唐明艳,杨永兴.旅游干扰下滇西北高原湖滨湿地植被及土壤变化特征[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(5):1283-1292. doi:10.13287/j. 1001-9332.2014.0096.
    [31] MA J H, MA X Z. A study on the migration and accumulation laws of soil materials in the juncture of Qinling-Huanghuai[J]. Mount Res, 1997, 15(1):36-41.马建华,马向忠.秦岭-黄淮平原交界带土壤物质迁移与积累[J].山地研究, 1997, 15(1):36-41.
    [32] JIA H J, LI S, HAO J, et al. Study on the relationship between water factors and plant diversity of wetland in the middle reaches of the Yellow River (Longmen-Fenhe river into the Yellow River entrance)[J]. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2017, 45(8):1325-1330. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1002-2481.2017.08.26.贾蕙君,李帅,郝婧,等.黄河中游(龙门-汾河入黄口)水分因子与湿地植物多样性的相关关系研究[J].山西农业科学, 2017, 45(8):1325-1330. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2017.08.26.
    [33] ZHAO T L, ZHAO R. Study on the correlation between soil environ-mental factors and plant diversity in the middle reaches of Yellow River (Longmen-Fenhe River Estuary)[J]. For Sci Technol, 2017(8):36-40. doi:10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2017.08.015.赵天梁,赵蓉.黄河中游(龙门-汾河入黄口)土壤含盐量与湿地植物多样性的相关关系研究[J].林业科技通讯, 2017(8):36-40. doi:10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2017.08.015.
    [34] XIONG S J, JOHANSSON M E, HUGHES F M R, et al. Interactive effects of soil moisture, vegetation canopy, plant litter and seed addition on plant diversity in a wetland community[J]. J Ecol, 2003, 91(6):976-986. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00827.x.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

黄燕,庞兴宸,陈景锋,汪理慧,吴永彬.广佛地区典型湿地类型植物多样性与土壤因子的关系[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2022,30(5):697~707

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:193
  • PDF: 476
  • HTML: 371
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:September 13,2021
  • Revised:November 09,2021
  • Adopted:April 15,2022
  • Online: September 26,2022
Article QR Code