Home > Archive>Volume 30, Issue 2, 2022 >233-240. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4434
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Studies on Species Composition and Diversity of Phoebe bournei-Cinnamomum camphora Plantation in Guangzhou
Author:
  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [23]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the relationship between community structure with species diversity of artificial mixed forest, the community structure of Phoebe bournei-Cinnamomum camphora mixed plantation in Longyandong Forest Farm in Guangzhou was analyzed. The results showed that there were 128 species 9 563 plants in 0.37 hm2 quadrat, belonging to 57 families and 99 genera, in which there were 35 tree, 61 shrub, and 98 herb species. In tree layer, the species with importance value at top 5 were Triadica cochinchinensis (33.86%), Phoebe bournei (17.24%), Triadica cochinchinensis (12.96%), Melicope pteleifolia (7.92%), and Litsea pungens (3.70%), the shrub layer was dominated by Rubiaceae, and did the herb layer by Poaceae. The Shannon-Wiener indexes of tree, shrub and herb layers were 1.230, 1.708, and 1.754, respectively, and the Simpson indexes were 0.635, 0.680, and 0.707, indicating that artificial mixed forest was rich in herbaceous species. The non-metric multidimensional scale (NMDS) analysis showed that the similarity of species composition was not consistent in different plots, and some plots contained occasional species. The diameter class structure of the community showed an inverted "J" type, of which 11.64% were seedlings, and saplings, small trees, strong trees and large trees account for 6.08%, 55.34%, 25.28%, and 0.70%, respectively. Therefore, it was suggested that the Phoebe bournei-Cinnamomum camphora mixed plantation was still in the early successional stage.

    Reference
    [1] HAN M C, LI Z Y. Ecological benefits evaluation of urban forest and its models[J]. World For Res, 2011, 24(2):42-46. doi:10.13348/j. cnki.sjlyyj.2011.02.011. 韩明臣, 李智勇. 城市森林生态效益评价及模型研究现状[J]. 世界林业研究, 2011, 24(2):42-46. doi:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2011. 02.011.
    [2] ZHAI S L, CHEN B F, LIN N, et al. Structure and species diversity of typical forests in Guangzhou City[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2015, 24(10):1625-1633. doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.10.006. 翟石磊, 陈步峰, 林娜, 等. 广州市典型森林植被的结构及多样性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(10):1625-1633. doi:10.16258/j. cnki.1674-5906.2015.10.006.
    [3] GOU L J, ZHANG W H, LIU G B. Species diversity and interspecific association in development sequence of Hippophae rhamnoides plan-tations in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2007, 18(1):9-15. doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.10.006. 郭连金, 张文辉, 刘国彬. 黄土丘陵区沙棘人工林发育过程中物种多样性及种间关联变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(1):9-15. doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.10.006.
    [4] CARDINALE B J, DUFFY J E, GONZALEZ A, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity[J]. Nature, 2012, 489(7401):59-67. doi:10.1038/nature11148.
    [5] CHEN Y, SUN B, LIAO S B, et al. Classification of main phyto-community and biodiversity in Shenzhen[J]. For Res, 2013, 26(5):636-642. doi:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.05.016. 陈勇, 孙冰, 廖绍波, 等. 深圳市主要植被群落类型划分及物种多样性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(5):636-642. doi:10.13275/j. cnki.lykxyj.2013.05.016.
    [6] WANG Z X, ZHU J M, WANG J, et al. The response of photosynthetic characters and biomass allocation of P. bournei young trees to different light regimes[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(12):3841-3848. doi:10. 5846/stxb201112021842. 王振兴, 朱锦懋, 王健, 等. 闽楠幼树光合特性及生物量分配对光环境的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(12):3841-3848. doi:10.5846/stxb201112021842.
    [7] WU J Y, HUANG M J, CHEN M G, et al. Study on seedling stage growth and early selection of different provenances of Phoebe bournei[J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2015, 35(11):1-4. doi:10.14067/j.cnki. 1673-923x.2015.11.001. 吴际友, 黄明军, 陈明皋, 等. 闽楠种源苗期生长差异与早期选择研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(11):1-4. doi:10.14067/j. cnki.1673-923x.2015.11.001.
    [8] SHENG W T. On the maintenance of long-term productivity of plantation in China[J]. For Res, 2018, 31(1):1-14. doi:10.13275/j. cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.001. 盛炜彤. 关于我国人工林长期生产力的保持[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):1-14. doi:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.001.
    [9] CHEN L D. Evaluation of the mixing effect of Phoebe bournei and Cinnamomum camphora[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2013, 19(15):102-103. doi:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2013.15.070. 陈来德. 闽楠与香樟混交效果评价[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(15):102-103. doi:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2013.15.070.
    [10] XIAO S D. Comparative experiment on afforestation with Phoebe bournei, Schima superba and Cinnamomum camphora[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2019, 25(1):118-119. doi:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731. 2019.01.045. 肖世栋. 闽楠、木荷与香樟造林效果分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(1):118-119. doi:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2019.01.045.
    [11] LI Z H. Discussion on the construction of wisdom forest farm:Take Longyan cave forest farm in Guangdong Province as an example[J]. For Sci Technol Informat, 2018, 50(4):57-59. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1009-3303.2018.04.020. 李志宏. 智慧林场建设的探讨——以广东省龙眼洞林场为例[J]. 林业科技情报, 2018, 50(4):57-59. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3303. 2018.04.020.
    [12] ZHOU B H, YU S J. Characteristics and environmental functions evaluation of the Pinus taiwanesis community in Tianzhu Mountain[J]. Geogr Res, 2008, 27(2):257-265. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2008. 02.003. 周葆华, 余世金. 天柱山黄山松群落特征及其环境功能评价[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(2):257-265. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2008. 02.003.
    [13] MA K P. Measuring method of diversity of biological community:I. Measuring method of α diversity[J]. Biodiv Sci, 1994, 2(3):162-168. 马克平. 生物群落多样性的测度方法:I. α多样性的测度方法[J]. 生物多样性, 1994, 2(3):162-168.
    [14] HAN D Y, LI H Y, YANG Y F. β-Diversity patterns of plant community in fragmented habitat in a degenerated meadow in Songnen Plain, China[J]. Chin Geogr Sci, 2009, 19(4):375-381. doi:10.1007/s11769-009-0375-7.
    [15] CLARKE K R, SOMERFIEL P J, CHAPMAN M G. On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray-Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages[J]. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 2006, 330(1):55-80. doi:10.1016/j.jembe. 2005.12.017.
    [16] DIXON P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology[J]. J Veg Sci, 2003, 14(6):927-930. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003. tb02228.x.
    [17] DU J X, LIU C, YIN C M, et al. Characteristics of the Castanopsis hainanensis+Cratoxylum cochinchinense community in Mt. Mihouling Nature Reserve, Hainan, China[J]. Plant Sci J, 2020, 38(5):609-617. doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2020.50609. 杜家贤, 刘闯, 殷崇敏, 等. 海南猕猴岭自然保护区海南锥+黄牛木群落特征研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2020, 38(5):609-617. doi:10. 11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2020.50609.
    [18] LIU S S, YE Y C, ZHANG Z S, et al. The species composition of secondary forest at Dalinshan in Dongguan City and its contribution to the species pool[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2005, 21(4):18-22. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2005.04.005. 刘颂颂, 叶永昌, 张柱森, 等. 东莞大岭山村边自然次生林群落物种组成特征及其对区域物种库的贡献[J]. 广东林业科技, 2005, 21(4):18-22. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2005.04.005.
    [19] MA L, WU L F, YE H G, et al. Studies on community characteristics of Michelia chapensis in Yejingbei, Zengcheng, Guangzhou[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2012, 20(2):169-176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395. 2012.02.011. 马磊, 吴林芳, 叶华谷, 等. 广州增城叶迳背乐昌含笑林群落特征研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2012, 20(2):169-176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012.02.011.
    [20] TETETLA-RANGEL E, DUPUY J M, HERNÁNDEZ-STEFANONI J L, et al. Patterns and correlates of plant diversity differ between common and rare species in a neotropical dry forest[J]. Biodiv Conserv, 2017, 26(7):1705-1721. doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1327-7.
    [21] RODRÍGUEZ-GARCÍA E, BRAVO F. Plasticity in Pinus pinaster populations of diverse origins:Comparative seedling responses to light and nitrogen availability[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2013, 307:196-205. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.046.
    [22] TANG X L, LIU G Z, JIANG J, et al. Effects of growth irradiance on photosynthesis and photorespiration of Phoebe bournei leaves[J]. Funct Plant Biol, 2020, 47(12):1053-1061. doi:10.1071/FP20062.
    [23] YU F Y, YE X, ZHOU R H, et al. Dynamic changes in plant diversity and soil physical and chemical properties in different habitats in Wenjiang section of Jinma River[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2021, 29(1):1-8. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4237. 余飞燕, 叶鑫, 周润惠, 等. 金马河温江段河岸带不同生境植物物种多样性与土壤理化性质的动态变化[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2021, 29(1):1-8. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4237.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

程欣欣,洪维,邓双文,魏雪莹,张干荣,冯蔚,郭勇,叶华谷,王发国.广州闽楠-樟人工混交林物种组成与多样性研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2022,30(2):233~240

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:231
  • PDF: 478
  • HTML: 426
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 25,2021
  • Revised:July 13,2021
  • Online: March 30,2022
Article QR Code
You are the first4648523 Visitors
Governing Body：中国科学院
Organizer：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
Address：Xingke Road 723,Tianhe District,Guangzhou,China
Phone：+86 (0)20-3725 2514
Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany ® 2025 All Rights Reserved