Home > Archive>Volume 29, Issue 1, 2021 >9-19. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4252
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Dynamic Changes in Niche and Interspecific Association of Major Species of Karst Secondary Forest in Central Guizhou
Author:
  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [44]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • |
  • Cited by [0]
    • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    To explore the succession rule of karst secondary forest in central Guizhou, based on the fixed-point monitoring data in 2013-2019, the dynamic changes of niche and interspecific association of karst secondary forest in central Guizhou were studied, including community species composition, niche width, niche overlap and interspecific association. The results showed that the proportion of important value of constructive species decreased in 7 years, and the dominance of species, such as Serissa japonica and Viburnum foetidum, increased significantly. Zanthoxylum armatum and Rosa cymosa occupied a wide niche, while the niche width of Stachyurus yunnanensis and Serissa japonica and other species have increased resource availability, which narrowed their niche width. The proportion of species pairs with niche overlap less than 0.2 decreased, and the relationship of interspecific competition was more complex. The overall connectivity among main species changed from non-significant positive association to significant positive association, and the proportion of positive and negative association between most species increased. In the karst secondary forest community of central Guizhou, the competition among species was intense and gradually stable, and the connection between species was strengthened. In the process of positive succession, the dominance and competitiveness of shade tolerant and mesophily species, such as Serissa japonica and Viburnum foetidum increased, but some pioneer species, such as Rhamnus heterophylla and Campylotropis macrocarpa, declined due to insufficient competition. Therefore, these would provide a reference for vegetation restoration and rocky desertification control in karst areas.

    Reference
    [1] GRINNELL J. The niche-relationships of the California thrasher[J]. Auk, 1917, 34(4):427-433. doi:10.2307/4072271.
    [2] YANG Z H, LANG X D, LI S F, et al. Niche and interspecific inter-action of dominant tree population in Cephalotaxus oliveri communities[J]. For Res, 2015, 28(4):473-478. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2015.04.004. 杨宗慧, 郎学东, 李帅锋, 等. 篦子三尖杉群落优势种群生态位和种间关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(4):473-478. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1001-1498.2015.04.004.
    [3] DENG X L, CAO Y S, LIANG Q, et al. Study on niche of dominant species at arbor layer in montane elfin forest of Jinggangshan[J]. J Plant Res Environ, 2016, 25(1):88-93. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.01.11. 邓贤兰, 曹裕松, 梁琴, 等. 井冈山山顶矮林乔木层优势种的生态位研究[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016, 25(1):88-93. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.01.11.
    [4] HAN J T, LI S Q, ZHAO D H, et al. Interspecific relationships among dominant species in the planted vegetation communities in sandy hill regions of northwestern Shanxi, China[J]. J Arid Land Res. Environ, 2016, 30(12):164-169. doi:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.400. 韩锦涛, 李素清, 赵德怀, 等. 晋西北丘陵风沙区人工植物群落优势种种间关系研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(12):164-169. doi:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.400.
    [5] ZHANG M X, WANG D X, KANG B, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Pinus armandii in Qinling Mountains[J]. Sci Silv Sin 2015, 51(1):12-21. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150102. 张明霞, 王得祥, 康冰, 等. 秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1):12-21. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150102.
    [6] KANG Y X, KANG B W, YUE J W, et al. The classification of Quercus liaotungensis communities and their niche in Loess Plateau of north Shaanxi[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(10):4096-4105. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.10.017. 康永祥, 康博文, 岳军伟, 等. 陕北黄土高原辽东栎(Quercus liao-tungensis)群落类型划分及其生态位特征[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10):4096-4105. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.10.017.
    [7] LI S F, LIU W D, SU J R, et al. Niches and interspecific associations of dominant tree populations at different restoration stages of monsoonal broad-leaved evergreen forest[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2011, 30(3):508-515. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2011.0072. 李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 季风常绿阔叶林不同恢复阶段乔木优势种群生态位和种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(3):508-515. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2011.0072.
    [8] LU W L, ZHANG H J, CHEN Q B, et al. Niche characteristics of the tree-layer dominant populations of Cunninghamia lanceolata forest in Chongqing Simian Mountains[J]. J NW For Univ, 2016, 31(2):60-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.02.11. 卢炜丽, 张洪江, 陈奇伯, 等. 重庆四面山杉木林群落乔木层优势种群生态位特征研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(2):60-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.02.11.
    [9] XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233. doi:10.5846/stxb201505311092. 徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233. doi:10.5846/stxb201505311092.
    [10] PAN G, ZHANG H P, PAN D. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in a mid-subtropical Choerospondias axillaris forest[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(4):892-901. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201704.020. 潘高, 张合平, 潘登. 中亚热带南酸枣林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(4):892-901. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201704.020.
    [11] YE D, WEN Y G, DENG R Y, et al. Dynamic changes of plant population niche in succession series of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Daming Mountain of Guanxi[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2009, 28(3):417-423. 叶铎, 温远光, 邓荣艳, 等. 大明山常绿阔叶林演替序列种群生态位动态特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(3):417-423.
    [12] ZHANG G M, TANG J W, SHI J P, et al. Niche dynamics of dominant populations of Musa acuminata Colia pioneer community in Xishuang-banna, SW. China[J]. J Plant Res Environ, 2000, 9(1):22-26. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2000.01.006. 张光明, 唐建维, 施济普, 等. 西双版纳野芭蕉先锋群落优势种群的生态位动态[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2000, 9(1):22-26. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2000.01.006.
    [13] YANG Q, ZHOU J, TAO C, et al. Comparative study on interspecific association in tropical evergreen monsoon elfin forest at two succe-ssional stages in Tongguling of Hainan Island[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(22):8-15. 杨琦, 周婧, 陶楚, 等. 海南岛铜鼓岭热带常绿季雨矮林2个演替阶段的种间联结性对比研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(22):8-15.
    [14] ZOU S, ZHOU G Y, ZHANG Q M, et al. Long-term (1992-2015) dynamics of interspecific associations among tree species in a monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(17):6362-6371. doi:10.5846/stxb201804030753. 邹顺, 周国逸, 张倩媚, 等. 1992-2015年鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林群落种间关联动态[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17):6362-6371. doi:10.5846/stxb201804030753.
    [15] FU W G, LI P P, BIAN X M, et al. Niche dynamics of populations of vegegation community in succession process in Zhenjiang Inner-river wetland[J]. Ecol Environ, 2008, 17(1):278-284. doi:10.16258/j.cnki. 1674-5906.2008.01.047. 付为国, 李萍萍, 卞新民, 等. 镇江内江湿地植物群落演替进程中种群生态位动态[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(1):278-284. doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2008.01.047.
    [16] GONG Z W, KANG X G, GU L, et al. Interspecific association among arbor species in two succession stages of spruce-fir conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest in Changbai Mountains, northeastern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2011, 33(5):28-33. doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.2011.05.018. 龚直文, 亢新刚, 顾丽, 等. 长白山云冷杉针阔混交林两个演替阶段乔木的种间联结性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(5):28-33. doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.2011.05.018.
    [17] LAAKA-LINDBERG S, POHJAMO M, KORPELAINEN H. Niche breadth and niche overlap in three epixylic hepatics in a boreal old-growth forest, southern Finland[J]. J Bryol, 2005, 27(2):119-127. doi:10.1179/037366805X53031.
    [18] MYSTER R W, PICKETT T A. Dynamics of associations between plants in ten old fields during 31 years of succession[J]. J Ecol, 1992, 80(2):291-302. doi:10.2307/2261012.
    [19] CHEN Y R, YIN L K. Community composition and niche change characteristics of dominant species in the wind-breaking and sand-fixing forest, Xinjiang, China[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(5):1126-1133. doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.017. 陈艳瑞, 尹林克. 人工防风固沙林演替中群落组成和优势种群生态位变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5):1126-1133. doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.017.
    [20] QIN S T, LONG C L, WU B L. Study on niche of dominant shrub populations in karst forest in Maolan Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province[J]. For Resour Manage, 2018(2):58-64,90. doi:10.13466/j. cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.011. 秦随涛, 龙翠玲, 吴邦利. 茂兰喀斯特森林优势灌木种群的生态位研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(2):58-64,90. doi:10.13466/j.cnki. lyzygl.2018.02.011.
    [21] YU X Y, YU R, HUANG J, et al. Analysis on interspecific associations among dominant populations in each layer of Loropetalum subcor-datum community in Maolan National Nature Reserve of Guizhou[J]. J Plant Res Environ, 2018, 27(2):24-32. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2018.02.04. 俞筱押, 余瑞, 黄娟, 等. 贵州茂兰国家级自然保护区四药门花群落各层次优势种群的种间联结性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2018, 27(2):24-32. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2018.02.04.
    [22] ZHANG Z H, HU G. Interspecific relationships of dominant species in Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in karst mountain area[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2011, 20(8/9):1209-1213. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2011.08.004. 张忠华, 胡刚. 喀斯特山地青冈栎群落优势种的种间关系分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(8/9):1209-1213. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2011.08.004.
    [23] QIN X, LONG C L, LI J. Analysis of ecological niches of dominant arbor populations in different succession stages in the karst forest in Maolan Nature Reserve[J]. J SW Univ (Nat Sci), 2017, 39(6):42-49. doi:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.06.007. 覃弦, 龙翠玲, 李娟. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同演替阶段优势乔木种群生态位研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6):42-49. doi:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.06.007.
    [24] ZHU S Q, CHEN Z R, WEI L M. The process and pattern of natural restoration in degraded Karst forest[J]. J Guizhou Univ (Agric Biol Sci), 2002, 21(1):19-25. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2002.01.005. 朱守谦, 陈正仁, 魏鲁明. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复的过程和格局[J]. 贵州大学学报(农业与生物科学版), 2002, 21(1):19-25. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2002.01.005.
    [25] LEVINS R. Evolution in Changing Environments:Some Theoretical Explorations[M]. Princetion:Princetion University Press, 1968.
    [26] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3):998-1005.
    [27] YU L F, ZHU S Q, YE J Z, et al. Dynamics of a degraded Karst forest in the process of natural restoration[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2002, 38(1):1-7. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.01.001. 喻理飞, 朱守谦, 叶镜中, 等. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复过程中群落动态研究[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38(1):1-7. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.01.001.
    [28] LI Y Y, ZHU S Q, ZHU X K. Number classification of degraded karst forests in the central Guizhou[J]. J Mount Agric Biol, 2000, 19(2):94-98. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2000.02.004. 李援越, 朱守谦, 祝小科. 黔中退化喀斯特森林植物群落的数量分类[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2000, 19(2):94-98. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1008-0457.2000.02.004.
    [29] YU L F. Primary study on the structure of bud population for Platy-carya longipes[J]. Guizhou Sci, 2003, 21(2):64-68. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1003-6563.2003.01.015. 喻理飞. 圆果化香芽种群结构初步研究[J]. 贵州科学, 2003, 21(2):64-68. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6563.2003.01.015.
    [30] YANG H B, WEI X L, DANG W. Species composition and diversity variations at different succession stages of karst vegetation in central Guizhou[J]. J Mount Agric Biol, 2009, 28(3):203-207. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1008-0457.2009.03.004. 杨华斌, 韦小丽, 党伟. 黔中喀斯特植被不同演替阶段群落物种组成及多样性[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2009, 28(3):203-207.
    [31] LIU J Z, CHEN Y N, ZHANG Y M. Niche characteristics of plants on four environmental gradients in middle reaches of Tarim River[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15(4):549-555. 刘加珍, 陈亚宁, 张元明, 塔里木河中游植物种群在四种环境梯度上的生态位特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(4):549-555
    [32] SI B, YAO X H, REN H D, et al. Species composition and diversity in the process of natural succession of Karst vegetation in central Guizhou:Case study of Puding country in Guizhou[J]. For Res, 2008, 21(5):669-674. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.05.014. 司彬, 姚小华, 任华东, 等. 黔中喀斯特植被自然演替过程中物种组成及多样性研究——以贵州省普定县为例[J]. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(5):669-674. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.05.014.
    [33] SONG Y C. Vegetation Ecology[M]. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press, 2001:267-268. 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2001:267-268.
    [34] BAI X H, ZHANG J T. Niche analysis of dominant species of forest community in Xiaowutai Mountain, China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28(12):3815-3826. doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201712.002. 白晓航, 张金屯. 小五台山森林群落优势种的生态位分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12):3815-3826. doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201712.002.
    [35] HUANG F Z, LI D X, WANG B, et al. Niche characteristics of dominant populations of tropical karst seasonal rainforest implications for vegetation restoration in rock desertification region[J]. Guangxi Sci, 2018, 25(5):599-610. doi:10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20181030.006. 黄甫昭, 李冬兴, 王斌, 等. 喀斯特季节性雨林优势种群生态位特征及其对石漠化地区植被修复的启示[J]. 广西科学, 2018, 25(5):599-610. doi:10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20181030.006.
    [36] CHEN X. Analysis of niches for several dominant tree species in evergreen broadleaved forest in Wuyishan[J]. J For Environ, 2016, 36(3):337-341. doi:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2016.03.014. 陈晓. 武夷山常绿阔叶林若干优势树种的生态位分析[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2016, 36(3):337-341. doi:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2016.03.014.
    [37] QIN L. Statistical Ecology[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Press, 2009:84-85. 覃林. 统计生态学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2009:84-85.
    [38] YANG N, ZOU D S, LI J G, et al. Niche dynamics of main plant communities in natural restoration succession process on sloping land with purple soils in Hengyang Basin[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2010, 30(4):87-93. doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2010.04.004. 杨宁, 邹冬生, 李建国, 等. 衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地主要植物群落自然恢复演替进程中种群生态位动态[J]. 水土保持通报, 2010, 30(4):87-93. doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2010.04.004.
    [39] ZHU D H, LIU J F, HONG W, et al. Studies on Regeneration niche of main species in Pinus taiwanensis community in Daiyun Mountain[J] J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2012, 20(6):561-565. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012.06.004. 朱德煌, 刘金福, 洪伟, 等. 戴云山黄山松群落主要树种更新生态位研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2012, 20(6):561-565. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012.06.004.
    [40] DONG D, XU X T, ZHOU Z X, et al. Niche dynamics of main populations of old-tree communities in Jiuhua Mountain Scenic Area of Anhui Province[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2019, 38(5):1292-1304. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201905.023. 董冬, 许小天, 周志翔, 等. 安徽九华山风景区古树群落主要种群生态位的动态变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5):1292-1304. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201905.023.
    [41] PENG S L, YAN X T, QI G, et al. Interspecific association dynamic changes among the dominant species of Quercus variabilis community in Funiushan National Nature Reserve[J]. J For Environ, 2018, 38(3):326-333. doi:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2018.03.011. 彭舜磊, 闫小婷, 齐光, 等. 伏牛山栓皮栎群落优势种群种间关联动态分析[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(3):326-333. doi:10.13324/j. cnki.jfcf.2018.03.011.
    [42] MA F F, PAN G, LI X Q, et al. Interspecific relationship and canonical correspondence analysis within woody plant communities in the karst mountains of Southwest Guangxi, southern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2017, 39(6):32-44. doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160379. 马丰丰, 潘高, 李锡泉, 等. 桂西南喀斯特山地木本植物群落种间关系及CCA排序[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(6):32-44. doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160379.
    [43] LIU R H, JIANG Y, CHANG B, et al. Interspecific associations and correlations among the main woody plants in a Pterocarya stenoptera community in a riparian zone of Lijiang River, Guilin, Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(19):6881-6893. doi:10.5846/stxb 201802270396. 刘润红, 姜勇, 常斌, 等. 漓江河岸带枫杨群落主要木本植物种间联结与相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19):6881-6893. doi:10.5846/stxb201802270396.
    [44] CHEN Y K, YANG X B, LI D H, et al. Interspecific associations among dominant populations in the communities with Alseodaphne hainanensis in Bawangling, Hainan Island[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2011, 19(3):237-244. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2011.03.008. 陈玉凯, 杨小波, 李东海, 等. 海南霸王岭油丹所在群落的优势种群种间联结性研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2011, 19(3):237-244. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2011.03.008.
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

李婷婷,容丽,王梦洁,叶天木,王琪.黔中喀斯特次生林主要物种的生态位及种间联结性动态变化[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2021,29(1):9~19

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:597
  • PDF: 659
  • HTML: 369
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:May 18,2020
  • Revised:June 28,2020
  • Online: January 19,2021
Article QR Code
You are the first4650358 Visitors
Governing Body：中国科学院
Organizer：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
Address：Xingke Road 723,Tianhe District,Guangzhou,China
Phone：+86 (0)20-3725 2514
Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany ® 2025 All Rights Reserved