WU Shi-jun
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Tropical Forestry Research, Guangzhou 510520, ChinaCHEN Guang-chao
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Tropical Forestry Research, Guangzhou 510520, ChinaXU Jian-min
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Tropical Forestry Research, Guangzhou 510520, ChinaLI Guang-you
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Tropical Forestry Research, Guangzhou 510520, ChinaSU Guo-lei
Yunnan Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd., Jinggu 666499, Yunnan, ChinaLUO Cheng-xue
Yunnan Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd., Jinggu 666499, Yunnan, ChinaZHOU Xing-rong
Yunnan Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd., Jinggu 666499, Yunnan, ChinaJIANG Cheng
Yunnan Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd., Jinggu 666499, Yunnan, ChinaResearch Institute of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,South of the Five Ridges Guangdong comprehensive survey and Design Institute,Research Institute of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Research Institute of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd.,Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd.,Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd.,Yunjing Forestry Development Co. Ltd.
In order to select excellent strains of Eucalyptus grandis, the growth traits, quality traits and crown width of 173 families from 11 provenances at 53-month-old grown in alpestrine of south Yunnan were analyzed. The results showed that there were significant differences in growth traits, quality traits and crown width among provenances and families. The phenotypic and genetic variation coefficients of DBH, H, V, stem form, branch and crown width were 26.90%~28.84%, 23.84%~25.28%, 62.34~67.55, 13.04%~25.62%, 13.04%~25.41% and 35.07~39.93, respectively. The provenance heritabilities were ranged from 0.94 to 0.96 and the family heritabilities were ranged from 0.88 to 0.95. The correlation analysis showed that there were significant positive correlations between DBH with H, V, stem form and crown width, also between H with other traits. The correlation coefficient between stem form and branch were 0.70, while that between crown width with stem form and branch were -0.03. The genetic gain of V was the biggest among all traits, and it was 66.11% by 5% selection rate. The change trend of genetic gain in H, DBH, stem form and branch were similar under different selection rate whereas the rank of their genetic gain was different. The 17 families were selected under 10% selection rate by comprehensive index selection, which derived from No. 1 (Copperlode, QLD), No. 4 (Koombooloomba, QLD), No. 6 (Copperlode Falls Dam, QLD), No. 7 (Bambaroo, QLD), No. 9 (Tianma, Dongxi, Fujian), and No. 11 (Leshan, Sichuan) provenances. The provenances of No. 2 (Ravenshoe, QLD) and No. 8 (Tully Gorge National Park, QLD) grow slowly. The best six families were No. 289, No. 283, No. 2, No. 42, No. 121 and No. 82, derived from six selected provenances, indicating that the selected families not only had good growth and branch traits but also had rich genetic diversity.
吴世军,陈广超,徐建民,李光友,粟国磊,罗成学,周兴荣,姜成.滇南亚高山巨桉种源/家系变异及早期选择研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2017,25(3):257~263
Copy
