Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Response to Meloidogyne incognita Infection in Tomato ‘Ls-89’ and ‘Banzhen 2’ Rootstock Seedlings
Author:
Affiliation:

Anhui Science and Technology University,Shandong Agricultural University

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [38]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In order to understand the relation between reactive oxygen (ROS) metabolism of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) rootstock seedlings and their resistance to Meloidogyne incognita, a high sensitive rootstock ‘Ls-89’ and a high resistant rootstock ‘Banzhen 2’ were planted in pots and inoculated with M. incognita, the effect of M. incognita infection on ROS metabolism and related enzyme activities in tomato rootstock seedlings was studied. The results showed that ROS level and related enzyme activities in roots and leaves had no significant difference between two varieties uninfected by M. incognita. After inoculated by M. incognita, both O2·- generation rate and H2O2 content in roots and leaves of two varieties increased, and those in ‘Banzhen 2’ were significantly higher than those in ‘Ls-89’, while MDA content in ‘Ls-89’ was significantly higher than that in ‘Banzhen 2’. At the early stage of infection, SOD activity decreased in roots and leaves of both varieties, and the decline in ‘Banzhen 2’ was bigger than that in ‘Ls-89’. The POD and CAT activities changed hardly at early stage of infection, and then significantly enhanced in middle and late infection stage. Therefore, the resistant rootstock seedlings had strong lipid antioxidant ability and high ROS level, and SOD activity in tomato rootstock seedlings was sensitive to the infection of M. incognita.

    Reference
    [1] Williamson V M, Hussey R S. Nematode pathogenesis and resistance in plants [J]. Plant Cell, 1996, 8(10): 1735-1745.
    [2] Sasser J N. Translated by Chen S Y. Plant Parasitic Nematodes: The Farmer's Hidden Enemy Plant Parasitic Nematodes [M]. Beijing: Popular Science Press, 1992: 4-5. 萨塞 J N. 陈森玉, 译. 植物寄生线虫 农业的隐蔽敌害 [M]. 北京: 科学普及出版社, 1992: 4-5.
    [3] Dan Y, Huang Z L, Wei X Y, et al. Progress in study on natural toxins against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus [J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2004, 12(4): 381-387. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2004.04.018. 丹阳, 黄忠良, 魏孝义, 等. 松材线虫的天然毒素研究进展 [J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2004, 12(4): 381-387. doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 1005-3395.2004.04.018.
    [4] Giannakou I O, Anastasiadis I. Evaluation of chemical strategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of root-knot nematodes in greenhouse cultivated crops [J]. Crop Prot, 2005, 24(6): 499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.09.007.
    [5] Cao Z P, Yu Y L, Chen G K, et al. Impact of soil fumigation practices on soil nematodes and microbial biomass [J]. Pedosphere, 2004, 14(3): 387-393.
    [6] Zhai H, Hao Y J, Wang S H. Preliminary study on the resistance mechanism of apple rootstock to a stubby root nematode [J]. Acta Phytophylac Sin, 1999, 26(3): 208-212. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0577-7518.1999.03.004. 翟衡, 郝玉金, 王寿华. 苹果砧木对南京毛刺线虫的抗性机制初探 [J]. 植物保护学报, 1999, 26(3): 208-212. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0577-7518.1999.03.004.
    [7] Tan J J, Ye J R. Research advance in pathogenic mechanism of pine wood nematode disease [J]. J Huazhong Agri Univ, 2003, 22(6): 613-617. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2421.2003.06.022. 谈家金, 叶建仁. 松材线虫病致病机理的研究进展 [J]. 华中农业 大学学报, 2003, 22(6): 613-617. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2421. 2003.06.022.
    [8] Xu X M, Yu Q, Xu K, et al. Effects of infection with Meloidogyne incognita on reactive oxygen metabolism and correlated enzyme activities in roots of eggplant rootstock seedlings [J]. Acta Hort Sin, 2008, 35(12): 1767-1772. 徐小明, 于芹, 徐坤, 等. 南方根结线虫侵染对茄子砧木幼苗根系活性氧代谢及相关酶活性的影响 [J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(12): 1767-1772.
    [9] He L X, Wu X Q, Yu L Z, et al. The difference of H2O2 and oxidative enzyme in the interaction of different resistance pines and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus [J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci), 2010, 34(6): 13-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2010.06.004. 何龙喜, 吴小芹, 俞禄珍, 等. 不同抗性松树与松材线虫互作中H2O2及其氧化酶活性的差异 [J]. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 34(6): 13-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2010.06.004.
    [10] Hao Y J, Zhai H, Wang S H. Change of physiochemical substances in Malus baccata infected with Trichodorus nanjingensis [J]. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 1999, 29(1): 82-85. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0412-0914.1999.01.016. 郝玉金, 翟衡, 王寿华. 山定子感染南京毛刺线虫后几种生理生化物质的变化 [J]. 植物病理学报, 1999, 29(1): 82-85. doi: 10. 3321/j.issn:0412-0914.1999.01.016.
    [11] Liu D W, Duan Y X, Chen L J, et al. Study on biochemical mechanism of Huipizhi heidou resistant to Race 3 of soybean cyst nematode [J]. Acta Agri Boreali-Sin, 2009, 24(1): 165-168. 刘大伟, 段玉玺, 陈立杰, 等. 灰皮支黑豆抗大豆胞囊线虫3号生理小种的生化机制研究 [J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(1): 165-168.
    [12] Zacheo G, Bleve-Zacheo T. Involvement of superoxide dismutases and superoxide radicals in the susceptibility and resistance of tomato plants to Meloidogyne incognita attack [J]. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 1988, 32(2): 313-322. doi: 10.1016/ S0885-5765(88)80026-2.
    [13] Peng D L, Tang W H. Advance of resistance gene Mi to root-knot nematodes in tomato [J]. J Shenyang Agri Univ, 2001, 32(3): 220- 223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2001.03.017. 彭德良, 唐文华. 番茄抗根结线虫Mi基因研究进展 [J]. 沈阳农 业大学学报, 2001, 32(3): 220-223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700. 2001.03.017.
    [14] Sasser J N, Eisenback J D, Carter C C, et al. The international meloidogyne project: Its goals and accomplishments [J]. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 1983, 21: 271-288. doi: 10.1146/annurev. py.21.090183.001415.
    [15] López-Pérez J A, Le Strange M, Kaloshian I, et al. Differential response of Mi gene-resistant tomato rootstocks to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) [J]. Crop Prot, 2006, 25(4): 382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.07.001.
    [16] Rivard C, Louws F. Tomato grafting for disease resistance and increased productivity [J/OL]. Sus Agri R Edu, 2011: 1-8. http:// www.sare.org/factsheet/12AGI2011
    [17] Dong D F, Cao Z P, Hu J. Effect of tomato resistant rootstock on soil root-knot nematode second-stage juveniles (J2) and free-living nematode [J]. Chin J Eco-Agri, 2008, 16(2): 436-440. 董道峰, 曹志平, 胡菊. 番茄抗性砧木对土壤根结线虫二龄幼虫和自由生活线虫的影响 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(2): 436-440.
    [18] Wang S H, Kong Y, Yang R, et al. Studies on rootstock screening and resistance to root-knot nematodes for grafted tomato [J]. China Veget, 2008(12): 24-27. 王绍辉, 孔云, 杨瑞, 等. 嫁接番茄抗根结线虫砧木筛选及抗性研究 [J]. 中国蔬菜, 2008(12): 24-27.
    [19] Jia S S, Gao R G, Xu K. Screening and evaluation of tomato rootstocks for resistance to Meloidogyne incognita [J]. Sci Agri Sin, 2009, 42(12): 4301-4307. 贾双双, 高荣广, 徐坤. 番茄砧木对南方根结线虫抗性鉴定 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(12): 4301-4307.
    [20] Liu W Z. Plant Nematology [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 1-438. 刘维志. 植物病原线虫学 [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 1-438.
    [21] Wang A G, Luo G H. Quantitative relation between the reaction of hydroxylamine and superoxide anion radicals in plants [J]. Plant Physiol Commun, 1990(6): 55-57. 王爱国, 罗广华. 植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系 [J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1990(6): 55-57.
    [22] Lin Z F, Li S S, Lin G Z, et al. The accumulation of hydrogen peroxide in senescing leaves and chloroplasts in relation to lipid peroxidation [J]. Acta Phytophysiol Sin, 1988, 14(1): 16-22. 林植芳, 李双顺, 林桂珠, 等. 衰老叶片和叶绿体中H2O2的累积与膜脂过氧化的关系 [J]. 植物生理学报, 1988, 14(1): 16-22.
    [23] Zhao S J, Shi G A, Dong X C. Techniques of Plant Physiological Experiment [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000: 95-97. 赵世杰, 史国安, 董新纯. 植物生理学实验指导 [M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000: 95-97.
    [24] Du X M, Yin W X, Zhao Y X, et al. The production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in plants [J]. Chin J Biotechn, 2001, 17(2): 121-125. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3061.2001.02.003. 杜秀敏, 殷文璇, 赵彦修, 等. 植物中活性氧的产生及清除机制 . 生物工程学报, 2001, 17(2): 121-125. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-3061.2001.02.003.
    [25] Luo Y L, Bi T J, Su Z L, et al. Physiological response of Kalanchoe tubiflora leaves to drought stress and rewatering [J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2014, 22(4): 391-398. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2014.04.010. 罗银玲, 华婷菊, 苏志龙, 等. 棒叶落地生根对干旱与复水的生理响应 [J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2014, 22(4): 391-398. doi: 10. 3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2014.04.010.
    [26] Hu X H, Li Y, Zou T C. Studies on physiological responses to aluminum stress of Plantago asiatica [J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2014, 22(5): 495-501. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2014.05.011. 胡雪华, 李蕴, 邹天才. 车前对铝胁迫生理响应的研究 [J]. 热带 亚热带植物学报, 2014, 22(5): 495-501. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2014.05.011.
    [27] Tománková K, Luhová L, Petřivalský M, et al. Biochemical aspects of reactive oxygen species formation in the interaction between Lycopersicon spp. and Oidium neolycopersici [J]. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 2006, 68(1/2/3): 22-32. doi: 10.1016/ j.pmpp.2006.05.005.
    [28] Otulak K, Garbaczewska G. Localisation of hydrogen peroxide accumulation during Solanum tuberosum cv. Rywal hypersensitive response to potato virus Y [J]. Micron, 2010, 41(4): 327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2009.12.004.
    [29] Jing L, Wang L F, Kang J, et al. The accumulation of active oxygens during the interactions of sunflower and rust fungus [J]. Acta Phytophylac Sin, 2009, 36(3): 246-250. 景岚, 王丽芳, 康俊, 等. 向日葵与锈菌互作过程中活性氧的积累 [J]. 植物保护学报, 2009, 36(3): 246-250.
    [30] Guo Y Y, Wang X F, Xu K, et al. Effect of Meloidogyne incognita on the physiological and chemical changes in ginger [J]. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2005, 35(1): 49-54. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0412-0914.2005.01.009. 郭衍银, 王秀峰, 徐坤, 等. 生姜对南方根结线虫侵染的生理生 化反应 [J]. 植物病理学报, 2005, 35(1): 49-54. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0412-0914.2005.01.009.
    [31] Chen Y H, Ye J R, Wei C J, et al. Effects of pine wood nematode infection on metabolism of active oxygen in Japanese black pine and slash pine seedlings [J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci), 2002, 26(4): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2002.04.005. 陈玉惠, 叶建仁, 魏初奖, 等. 松材线虫对黑松、湿地松幼苗活性氧代谢的影响 [J]. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 26(4): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2002.04.005.
    [32] Borden S, Higgins V J. Hydrogen peroxide plays a critical role in the defence response of tomato to Cladosporium fulvum [J]. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 2002, 61(4): 227-236. doi: 10.1006/ pmpp.2002.0435.
    [33] Guo H L, Chen J, Gao Z G, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species metabolism in resistance mechanism to gray leaf spot in maize [J]. Acta Phytophylac Sin, 2003, 30(2): 133-137. doi: 10. 3321/ j.issn:0577-7518.2003.02.005. 郭红莲, 陈捷, 高增贵, 等. 玉米灰斑病抗性机制中活性氧代谢的作用 [J]. 植物保护学报, 2003, 30(2): 133-137. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0577-7518.2003.02.005.
    [34] Song R F, Ding Y L, Gong C R, et al. Research advances in relationship between tobacco resistance and protective enzymes activity [J]. Chin Agri Sci Bull, 2007, 23(5): 309-314. doi: 10. 3969/ j.issn.1000-6850.2007.05.072. 宋瑞芳, 丁永乐, 宫长荣, 等. 烟草抗病性与防御酶活性间的关系研究进展 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(5): 309-314. doi: 10. 3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.05.072.
    [35] Chen J M, Yu X P, Cheng J A, et al. The changes of physiological indexes of different rice varieties after infestation by brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) [J]. Acta Phytophylac Sin, 2003, 30(3): 225-231. 陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安, 等. 不同水稻品种受褐飞虱危害后体内生理生指标的变化 [J]. 植物保护学报, 2003, 30(3): 225-231.
    [36] Montes M J, López-Braña I, Delibes A. Root enzyme activities associated with resistance to Heterodera avenae conferred by gene Cre7 in a wheat/Aegilops triuncialis introgression line [J]. J Plant Physiol, 2004, 161(4): 493-495. doi:10.1078/0176-1617-01165.
    [37] Ye D Y, Qian C T, Jia Y Y, et al. Cucumber and its related species for resistance to the sourthern root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and respond to changes of enzyme [J]. Acta Hort Sin, 2009, 36(12): 1755-1760. 叶德友, 钱春桃, 贾媛媛, 等. 黄瓜及其近缘种对南方根结线虫的抗性及酶响应变化的研究 [J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(12): 1755-1760.
    [38] Wang W, Ruan M H, Qiu Y X, et al. Phenylaprapanoid metabolism of sweet potato against Pseudomonas solanacearum [J]. Chin J Eco-Agri, 2009, 17(5): 944-948. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011. 2009.00944. 王伟, 阮妙鸿, 邱永祥, 等. 甘薯抗薯瘟病的苯丙烷类代谢研究 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(5): 944-948. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2009.00944.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

贾双双,徐坤.番茄‘Ls-89’和‘坂砧2号’幼苗活性氧代谢对南方根结线虫侵染的反应[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2016,24(1):63~70

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:April 10,2015
  • Revised:June 19,2015
  • Adopted:August 24,2015
  • Online: January 21,2016
Article QR Code