Home > Archive>Volume 21, Issue 3, 2013 >211-219. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2013.03.003
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Dynamic Changes in Carbon and Nitrogen Storage of Phyllostachys edulis Forest with Rhizome Expansion
Author:
Affiliation:

International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan,Key Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan,International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan,Key Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan,International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan,Key Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan,International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan,Key Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [29]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The purpose was to comprehend the dynamic changes in carbon and nitrogen storage of Phyllostachys edulis forest with rhizome expansion, the changes in carbon and nitrogen storage of P. edulis forest in Yong'an City, Fujian Province were studied with abandoned land and 14-year-old Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) forest as control. The results showed that the carbon and nitrogen storage of forest was higher significantly than that of abandoned land. The carbon storage of P. edulis forest deceased firstly and then increased quickly when Chinese fir transformed into moso bamboo. The carbon storage reached the maximum when moso bamboo forest was 10 years old, and then decreased with age increasing. The change trend of carbon storage was difference from that of nitrogen storage. The nitrogen storage of moso bamboo forest with more than 10-year-old was higher significantly than that of 14-year-old Chinese fir, and the nitrogen storage of moso bamboo forest at the age of 5 were lower significantly than that of Chinese fir. The carbon and nitrogen storages of all forest types were in the order: soil layer > tree layer > litter-fall layer > vegetation layer under canopy. Meanwhile, the carbon and nitrogen storages in soil layer decreased while those in tree layer increased. The carbon and nitrogen storages in litter-fall of moso bamboo were higher than those in abandoned land, and lower than those in Chinese fir forest. Meanwhile, the carbon and nitrogen storages in litter-fall of moso bamboo forest decreased with stand age increasing. The low carbon and nitrogen storages in litter-fall of moso bamboo forest may decline continued carbon sequestration capacity. So, it was important to balance the carbon and nitrogen storages between tree layer and soil layer.

    Reference
    [1] Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton R A, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystem [J]. Science, 1994, 263(5144): 185-190.
    [2] Hessen D O, Ågren G I, Anerson T R, et al. Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: The role of stoichiometry [J]. Ecology, 2004, 85(5): 1179-1192.
    [3] Xiang W H, Huang Z H, Yan W D, et al. Review on coupling of interactive functions between carbon and nitrogen cycles in forest ecosystems [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26(7): 2365-2372. 项文化, 黄志宏, 闫文德, 等. 森林生态系统碳氮循环功能耦合 研究综述 [J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(7): 2365-2372.
    [4] Wang B, Wang Y, Guo H, et al. Carbon storage and spatial distribution in Phyllostachys pubescens forest in Dagangshan Mountain of Jiangxi Province [J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2009, 31(6): 39-42. 王兵, 王燕, 郭浩, 等. 江西大岗山毛竹林生态系统碳贮量及其 分配特征研究 [J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(6): 39-42.
    [5] Parton W J, Schimel D S, Cole C V. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands [J]. Soil Sci Soc Amer J, 1987, 51(5): 1173-1179.
    [6] Zhang S J, Xiang W H. Research progress in effects of land use mode on soil active organic carbon [J]. J C South Univ For Techn, 2012, 32(5): 134-142. 张仕吉, 项文化. 土地利用方式对土壤活性有机碳影响的研究 进展 [J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(5): 134-142.
    [7] Liu E, Wang H, Liu S R. Characteristics of carbon storage and sequestration in different age beech (Castanopsis hystrix) plantations in south subtropical area of China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23(2): 335-340. 刘恩, 王晖, 刘世荣. 南亚热带不同林龄红锥人工林碳贮量与碳 固定特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(2): 335-340.
    [8] Qin X J, Ding G J. Characteristics of soil organic carbon and its relationship with nutrients in different age Pinus massoniana plantation stands [J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Techn, 2012, 32(2): 12-17. 秦晓佳, 丁贵杰. 不同林龄马尾松人工林土壤有机碳特征及其 与养分的关系 [J]. 浙江林业科技, 2012, 32(2): 12-17.
    [9] Chen X C, Liu G L, Fan S H, et al. Growth characteristics and biomass distribution of Phyllostachys pubescens stands with changes in fertilization time [J]. J Zhejiang Agri For Univ, 2012, 29(1): 52-57. 陈孝丑, 刘广路, 范少辉, 等. 连续施肥对毛竹林生长特征及 生物量空间构型的影响 [J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(1): 52-57.
    [10] Feng Z W, Wang X K, Wu G. Biomass and Productivity of Forest Ecosystems in China [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1999:103-104. 冯宗炜, 王效科, 吴刚. 中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 103-104.
    [11] Liu G L, Fan S H, Guan F Y, et al. Soil environmental characteristics of diferent types of Phyllostachys pubescens forests with intensive cultivation in northwest of Fujian province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci), 2010, 34(5): 17-22. 刘广路, 范少辉, 官凤英, 等. 闽西北不同类型集约经营毛竹 林土壤环境特征 [J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 34(5): 17-22.
    [12] Liu G L, Fan S H, Guan F Y, et al. Distribution pattern of nutrient elements and its relationship with soil environment in different aged Phyllostachys edulis [J]. For Res, 2010, 23(2): 252-258. 刘广路, 范少辉, 官凤英, 等. 不同年龄毛竹营养器官主要养 分元素分布及与土壤环境的关系 [J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(2): 252-258.
    [13] Lu X, Xiang W H, Liu C. Storage and distribution of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in four subtropical forests in central southern China [J]. J Soil Water Cons, 2012, 26(3): 169-173. 路翔, 项文化, 刘聪. 中亚热带4种森林类型土壤有机碳氮贮量 及分布特征 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(3): 169-173.
    [14] Qi L H, Liu G L, Fan S H, et al. Effects of different tending measures on carbon density, storage, and allocation pattern of Phyllostachy edulis forests in western Fujian Province [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2009, 28(8): 1482-1488. 漆良华, 刘广路, 范少辉, 等. 不同抚育措施对闽西毛竹林碳 密度、碳贮量与碳格局的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(8): 1482-1488
    [15] Ge Q S, Dai J H, He F N, et al. Land use and cover change of the past 300 years in China and its nitrogen cycle effects [J]. Sci China: Earth Sci, 2008, 38(2): 197-210. 葛全胜, 戴君虎, 何凡能, 等. 过去300 年中国土地利用、土地 覆被变化与碳循环研究 [J]. 中国科学(D 辑: 地球科学), 2008, 38(2): 197-210.
    [16] Xu W L, Tang G M, Sheng J D, et al. Effects of cultivation on organic carbon fractionation and aggregate stability in Xinjiang oasis soils [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(7): 1773-1779. 徐万里, 唐光木, 盛建东, 等. 垦殖对新疆绿洲农田土壤有机 碳组分及团聚体稳定性的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7): 1773-1779.
    [17] Zhang J H, Li G D, Nan Z R. Soil particle size distribution and its relationship with soil organic carbons under different land uses in the middle of Heihe River [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(12): 3745-3753. 张俊华, 李国栋, 南忠仁. 黑河中游典型土地利用方式下土 壤粒径分布及与有机碳的关系 [J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(12): 3745-3753.
    [18] Huang C D, Zhang J, Deng Y L, et al. Carbon storage and allocation patterns of young forests converted by farmland [J]. J Soil Water Cons, 2012, 21(4): 130-133. 黄从德, 张健, 邓玉林, 等. 退耕还林地在植被恢复初期碳储量 及分配格局研究 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 21(4): 130-133.
    [19] Xiao F M, Fan S H, Wang S L, et al. Estimation of the carbon balance in moso bamboo and Chinese fir plantation ecosystem[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2010, 46(11): 59-65. 肖复明, 范少辉, 汪思龙, 等. 毛竹、杉木人工林生态系统碳平 衡估算 [J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(11): 59-65.
    [20] Yen T M, Lee J S. Comparing aboveground carbon sequestration between moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla) and Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) forests based on the allometric model [J]. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 261(6): 995-1002.
    [21] Wang H Y, Wang W J, Qin L, et al. Differences in biomass, litter layer mass and SOC storage changing with tree growth in Larix gmelinii plantations in northeast China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(3): 833-843. 王洪岩, 王文杰, 邱岭, 等. 兴安落叶松林生物量、地表枯落物 量及土壤有机碳储量随林分生长的变化差异 [J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3): 833-843.
    [22] Herbert D A, Williams M, Rastetter E B. A model analysis of N and P limitation on carbon accumulation in Amazonian secondary forest after alternate land-use abandonmenty [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2003, 65(1): 121-150.
    [23] Chapin S F III, Matson P, Mooney H A. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002: 183-188.
    [24] Zhou G L, Guan L L, Wei X H, et al. Factors influencing leaf litter decomposition: An intersite decomposition experiment across China [J]. Plant Soil, 2008, 311(1/2): 61-72.
    [25] Wang X E, Xue L, Xie T F. A review on litter decomposition [J]. Chin J Soil Sci, 2009, 40(6): 1473-1478. 王相娥, 薛立, 谢腾芳. 凋落物分解研究进展 [J]. 土壤通报, 2009, 40(6): 1473-1478.
    [26] Fu M Y, Fang M Y. Nutrient cycling in bamboo stands: Ⅰ: leaf litter and its decomposition in pure Phyllostachys pubescens stands [J]. For Res, 1989, 2(3): 207-213. 傅懋毅, 方敏瑜. 竹林养分循环: I. 毛竹纯林的叶凋落物及其 分解 [J]. 林业科学研究, 1989, 2(3): 207-213.
    [27] Wang J J, Xu Q F, Jiang P K. Impacts of litter of Phyllostachy pubescens on functional biodiversity of soil microorganism communities in broad-leaved forest [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2008, 44(9): 146-151. 王纪杰, 徐秋芳, 姜培坤. 毛竹凋落物对阔叶林土壤微生物群 落功能多样性的影响 [J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(9): 146-151.
    [28] Liu G L, Fan S H, Guan F Y, et al. Effects of different proportion mixed Phyllostachys pubescens leaf litter on litter decomposition in P. pubescens forest [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2011, 30(8): 1598-1603. 刘广路, 范少辉, 官凤英, 等. 毛竹凋落叶组成对叶凋落物分解 的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(8): 1598-1603.
    [29] Liu G L. Study on the mechanism of maintaining long-term productivity of bamboo forest [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2009: 49-50. 刘广路. 毛竹林长期生产力保持机制研究 [D]. 北京: 中国林 业科学研究院, 2009: 49-50.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

刘广路,范少辉,郭宝华,杜满义.扩鞭繁殖毛竹林碳氮贮量的动态变化特征[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2013,21(3):211~219

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:2524
  • PDF: 2412
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:September 24,2012
  • Revised:November 06,2012
  • Adopted:January 17,2013
  • Online: May 22,2013
Article QR Code
You are the first4646066 Visitors
Governing Body：中国科学院
Organizer：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
Address：Xingke Road 723,Tianhe District,Guangzhou,China
Phone：+86 (0)20-3725 2514
Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany ® 2025 All Rights Reserved