首页 > 过刊浏览>2024年第32卷第6期 >695-704. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4828
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
广东大峡谷常绿阔叶林主要植物种间关系、生态位及其群落稳定性研究
作者:
基金项目:

广东省林木种质资源调查项目(SL00102);国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1303003-06);广东省科技厅林业生态监测网络平台建设项目(2022CG646);广东珠江三角洲森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站项目(0144135)资助


Study on Interspecific Relationship and Ecological Niche of Dominant Species and Community Stability of the Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Guangdong Grand Canyon
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [39]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探究特殊生境中常绿阔叶林主要植物的种间关系、生态位状态及群落稳定性，可为区域的生物多样性保育和自然保护地的保护管理提供科学依据。该文基于广东大峡谷森林生物多样性固定监测样地野外调查数据和2×2列联表，测定了主要植物的重要值、生态位宽度和生态位重叠，并应用方差比率法和χ2检验分析主要植物间的种间联结、OI指数、DI指数，并依据Godron法评价群落稳定性。结果表明，群落共记录104种植物，隶属于39科74属，其中木荷(Schima superba)的重要值和生态位宽度最大，华润楠(Machilus chinensis)、鸭脚木(Schefflera octophylla)、罗浮柿(Diospyros morrisiana)和黄杞(Engelhardia roxburghiana)次之，5种树在群落资源竞争中占据优势地位，并且与群落中其他植物产生了较高的生态位重叠(占总数的67.16%)。群落主要26优势种325种对中，负联结大于正联结。χ2检验结果表明种间相对独立性强，联结较为松散；但5种主要优势种间呈现紧密的关联性，相伴出现率大。Godron法分析表明，群落处于不稳定状态，群落物种间呈现显著负关联。因此，广东乳源大峡谷常绿阔叶林群落种间联结不强，群落不稳定，亟待加强保育和经营管理。

    Abstract:

    The research on the interspecific relationship, niche status and community stability of dominant plants in evergreen broad-leaved forests in special habitats can provide scientific basis for the conservation of regional biodiversity and the conservation and management of nature reserves. Based on the filed investigation data of long-term plots in Guangdong Grand Canyon and 2×2 correlation tables, the importance value, niche width and niche overlap of dominant species were determined. The index of interspecific associations, OI index and DI index for dominant species were analyzed by using variance ratio method and χ2 test. Moreover, the community stability was evaluated by Godron method. The results showed that there were 104 species, belonging to 39 families and 74 genera, in which the importance value and niche width of Schima superba were the biggest, followed by Machilus chinensis, Heptapleurum heptaphyllum, Diospyros morrisiana and Engelhardia roxburghiana. These five species occupied a dominant position in the competition for community resources and had a high niche overlap with other plants in the community (67.16% of the total). In 325 pairs of 26 dominant species, negative associations were greater than positive associations. χ2 test showed that the species were relatively independent and loosely connected. However, the five dominant species showed close correlation, and the concomitant occurrence rate was high. Godron method analysis showed that the community was in an unstable state and there was a significant negative correlation between species. Therefore, it was revealed that the interspecific association of the community in broad-leaved evergreen forests in Guangdong Grand Canyon had weak interspecific association and unstable community, which needs to be strengthened for conservation and management.

    参考文献
    [1] ZHANG M X, WANG M X, KANG B, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Pinus armandii in Qinling Mountains [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2015, 51(1): 12–21. [张明霞, 王得祥, 康冰, 等. 秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1): 12–21. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150102.]
    [2] CHU C J, WANG Y S, LIU Y, et al. Advances in species coexistence theory [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2017, 25(4): 345–354. [储诚进, 王酉石, 刘宇, 等. 物种共存理论研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(4): 345–354. doi: 10.17520/biods.2017034.]
    [3] QIAN Y F, YI L T, HU J F, et al. Niche characteristics of main plant species in Putuo Mountain, Zhejiang Province of East China [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2012, 31(3): 561–568. [钱逸凡, 伊力塔, 胡军飞, 等. 普陀山主要植物种生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(3): 561–568. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0122.]
    [4] FANG F, HU Y K, ZHANG W, et al. Numerical analysis of interspecific relationships in Alpine steppe community in Bayanbulak [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(6): 1898–1907. [房飞, 胡玉昆, 张伟, 等. 高寒草原植物群落种间关系的数量分析[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(6): 1898–1907. doi: 10.5846/stxb201102170182.]
    [5] JIANG H, ZHANG H, LONG W X, et al. Interspecific associations and niche characteristics of communities invaded by Decalobanthus boisianus [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(4): 388–399. [江焕, 张辉, 龙文兴, 等. 金钟藤入侵群落的种间联结及生态位特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4): 388–399. doi: 10.17520/biods.2019007.]
    [6] XIAO J H, XIONG K H, CHEN Y L, et al. Niche and interspecific association of main species in shrub layer of Acacia confusa community in Langqi Island, Fujian Province [J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2023, 31(6): 805–815. [肖集泓, 熊宽洪, 陈越琳, 等. 福建琅岐岛台湾相思群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2023, 31(6): 805–815. doi: 10.11926/jtsb.4687.]
    [7] LIU H, DU R W, WANG Y, et al. Effects of Eupatorium adenophorum on interspecific association and the stability of companion species in Liangshan Prefecture of Sichuan Province [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(15): 5031–5038. [刘海, 杜如万, 王勇, 等. 紫茎泽兰对四川省凉山州共生植物种间联结性及稳定性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15): 5031–5038. doi: 10.5846/stxb201605070876.]
    [8] PEI S X, FA L, DU M Y, et al. Effects of interspecific relationship on natural regeneration and community stability of Pinus tabuliformis plantation in Zhongtiao Mountain [J]. For Res, 2022, 35(1): 150–157. [裴顺祥, 法蕾, 杜满义, 等. 种间关系对中条山油松人工林天然更新及群落稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(1): 150–157. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.01.017.]
    [9] ZHANG D M, ZHAO W Z, LUO W C. Niche and interspecific association of dominant plant species in saline-alkaline soils of desert steppe zone [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(5): 1307–1315. [张东梅, 赵文智, 罗维成. 荒漠草原带盐碱地优势植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1307–1315. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201805.027.]
    [10] ZOU S, ZHOU G Y, ZHANG Q M, et al. Long-term (1992–2015) dynamics of interspecific associations among tree species in a monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(17): 6362–6371. [邹顺, 周国逸, 张倩媚, 等. 1992—2015年鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林群落种间关联动态[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6362–6371. doi: 10.5846/stxb201804030753.]
    [11] DENG X L, CAO Y S, LIANG Q, et al. Study on niche of dominant species at arbor layer in montane elfin forest of Jinggangshan [J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2016, 25(1): 88–93. [邓贤兰, 曹裕松, 梁琴, 等. 井冈山山顶矮林乔木层优势种的生态位研究[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016, 25(1): 88–93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.01.11.]
    [12] JIAN M F, LIU Q J, ZHU D, et al. Inter-specific correlations among dominant populations of tree layer species in evergreen broad-leaved forest in Jiulianshan mountain of subtropical China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(4): 672–680. [简敏菲, 刘琪璟, 朱笃, 等. 九连山常绿阔叶林乔木优势种群的种间关联性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 672–680. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.005.]
    [13] CHEN Y K, YANG Q, MO Y N, et al. A study on the niches of the state’s key protected plants in Bawangling, Hainan Island [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(6): 576–584. [陈玉凯, 杨琦, 莫燕妮, 等. 海南岛霸王岭国家重点保护植物的生态位研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 576–584. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00053.]
    [14] CHEN H Y, LAN M Y, SUN C X, et al. Community structure and interspecific association in different forest successional stages in north Guangdong [J]. J For Environ, 2022, 42(5): 465–473. [陈泓宇, 兰明钰, 孙传玺, 等. 粤北不同演替阶段森林群落结构与种间关联[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2022, 42(5): 465–473. doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2022. 05.003.]
    [15] ZHANG B W, QIN J, REN Z M, et al. Effects of slope aspect on understory plant diversity of Pinus massonianapure forest and different coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest types in north subtropical region [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2022, 31(6): 1091–1100. [张博文, 秦娟, 任忠明, 等. 坡向对北亚热带区马尾松纯林及不同针阔混交林型林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1091–1100. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.06.003.]
    [16] ZHANG Z H, LIANG S C, HU G. Niche characteristics of dominant populations in Cinnamomum burmanniicommunity on karst hills of Guilin [J]. For Res, 2009, 22(1): 63–68. [张忠华, 梁士楚, 胡刚. 桂林岩溶石山阴香群落主要种群生态位研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(1): 63–68. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.01.011.]
    [17] ZHONG Y, ZHANG J, LIU Q B, et al. Niche characteristics of main herbage populations in Eucalyptus grandis plantation [J]. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2010, 19(4): 16–21. [钟宇, 张健, 刘泉波, 等. 巨桉人工林草本层主要种群的生态位分析[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 16– 21.]
    [18] LIU J H, WANG Z W, HAN G D. Effects of heavy grazing on the interspecific relationship of main plant species and community stability in a desert steppe [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2019, 38(9): 2595–2602. [刘菊红, 王忠武, 韩国栋. 重度放牧对荒漠草原主要植物种间关系及群落稳定性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 2595–2602. doi: 10.13292/ j.1000-4890.201909.012.]
    [19] GUO J Q, CHEN J C, HUANG X, et al. Niche characteristics and interspecific associations of the dominant species of the communities invaded by Alternanthera philoxeroides [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2021, 30(8): 1607–1616. [郭佳琦, 陈俊辰, 黄旬, 等. 喜旱莲子草入侵群落主要物种生态位和种间联结研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1607–1616. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.007.]
    [20] JIAN Z J, LI T Z, GUO Q S, et al. Interspecific association of main plants in the water level fluctuation zone of canyon landform area of the Three Gorges Reservoir [J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2016, 36(10): 2086–2093. [简尊吉, 李堂中, 郭泉水, 等. 三峡水库峡谷地貌区消落带主要植物种间关联性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36(10): 2086–2093. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2016.10.2086.]
    [21] WEN P C, WANG L J, SHENG M Y. Characteristics of Plant community and its relationships with soil physic-chemical properties in the rocky desertification ecosystem of Karst Plateau Canyon, southwest China [J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2018, 36(2): 175–184. [温培才, 王霖娇, 盛茂银. 西南喀斯特高原峡谷石漠化生态系统植物群落特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(2): 175–184. doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2018.02.008.]
    [22] ZHANG W. Basic researches conservation biology of endangered species Juglans cathayensis in Tianshan valley in Xinjiang, China [D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2016. [张维. 新疆天山峡谷渐危植物野核桃保护生物学基础研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2016.]
    [23] ZOU J P, LIN S H, XU G Y, et al. Investigation on birds resources in Ruyuan grand canyon provincial nature reserve in Guangdong Province [J]. Trop For, 2021, 49(3): 51–56. [邹建平, 林顺和, 许根有, 等. 广东乳源大峡谷省级自然保护区鸟类资源调查[J]. 热带林业, 2021, 49(3): 51–56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2021.03.013.]
    [24] ZHENG F Z, LIN S H, XU Y G, et al. Survey of amphibians and reptiles resources in Guangdong Ruyuan Grand Canyon Provincial Nature Reserve [J]. Trop For, 2021, 49(3): 64–69. [郑飞舟, 林顺和, 许根有, 等. 广东乳源大峡谷省级自然保护区两栖爬行动物资源概况[J]. 热带林业, 2021, 49(3): 64–69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938. 2021.003.016.]
    [25] YU F, WANG Y, ZHANG G G, et al. Plant diversity and interspecific associations of different floodplains in the wandering Yellow River [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2023, 43(6): 2429–2439. [于飞, 王洋, 张岗岗, 等. 游荡型黄河滩涂植物群落多样性及种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(6): 2429–2439. doi: 10.5846/stxb202108202317.]
    [26] FENG H H, WEN S Z, XIAO Y T, et al. Analysis about the vegetation landscape of Guangdong Ruyuan Grand Canyon Nature Reserve [J]. J CS Univ For, 2006, 26(1): 90–94. [冯汉华, 文仕知, 肖育檀, 等. 广东乳源大峡谷自然保护区植被景观特征分析[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2006, 26(1): 90–94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2006.01.008.]
    [27] VALLADARES F, NIINEMETS Ü. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences [J]. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2008, 39: 237–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506.
    [28] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications [J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3): 998–1005. doi: 10.2307/1938071.
    [29] LIU R H, CHEN L, TU H R, et al. Niche and interspecific association of main species in shrub layer of Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in karst hills of Guilin, southwest China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(6): 2057–2071. [刘润红, 陈乐, 涂洪润, 等. 桂林岩溶石山青冈群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 2057– 2071. doi: 10.5846/stxb201904090689.]
    [30] ZHANG W P, LIU G C, SUN J H, et al. Temporal dynamics of nutrient uptake by neighbouring plant species: Evidence from intercropping [J]. Funct Ecol, 2017, 31(2): 469–479. doi: 10.1111/13652435.12732.
    [31] LEVINE J M, BASCOMPTE J, ADLER P B, et al. Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities [J]. Nature, 2017, 546(7656): 56–64. doi: 10.1038/nature22898.
    [32] TILMAN D. Resource Competition and Community Structure [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.
    [33] HAN J T, LI S Q, ZHAO D H, et al. Interspecific relationships among dominant species in the planted vegetation communities in sandy hill regions of northwestern Shanxi, China [J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2016, 30(12): 164–169. [韩锦涛, 李素清, 赵德怀, 等. 晋西北丘陵风沙区人工植物群落优势种种间关系研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(12): 164–169. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.400.]
    [34] YE Q P, ZHANG W H, YU S C, et al. Interspecific association of the main tree populations of the Quercus acutissima community in the Qiaoshan forest area [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(9): 3165–3174. [叶权平, 张文辉, 于世川, 等. 桥山林区麻栎群落主要乔木种群的种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(9): 3165–3174. doi: 10.5846/stxb 201706131071.]
    [35] ZHOU R W, PENG M C, WANG C Y, et al. Study on interconnections among main tree populations of Davidia involucrate community of Qiaojia Yaoshan Mountain in Yunnan [J]. J W China For Sci, 2015, 44(1): 51–57. [周瑞伍, 彭明春, 王崇云, 等. 云南巧家药山珙桐群落主要树种种间联结研究[J]. 西部林业科学, 2015, 44(1): 51–57. doi: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2015.01.019.]
    [36] HE D, BISWAS S R. Negative relationship between interspecies spatial association and trait dissimilarity [J]. Oikos, 2019, 128(5): 659– 667. doi: 10.1111/oik.05876.
    [37] JIA C X Z, LI S F, SU J R, et al. Effects of selective logging on interand intra-specific interactions of trees in a natural Pinus kesiya forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(12): 1296–1306. [贾呈鑫卓, 李帅锋, 苏建荣, 等. 择伐对思茅松天然林乔木种间与种内关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1296–1306. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258. 2014.00124.]
    [38] MAO Z K, HAO Z Q, YUAN Z Q, et al. Abundance-asymmetry in conspecific aggregation and interspecific interaction [J]. Sci Sin Vitae, 2020, 50(4): 381–390. [毛子昆, 郝占庆, 原作强, 等. 物种聚集分布与种间关系的多度不对称性[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2020, 50(4): 381–390. doi: 10.1360/N052018-00101.]
    [39] XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(24): 8224–8233. [徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24): 8224–8233. doi: 10.5846/stxb201505311092.]
    引证文献
引用本文

肖以华,付志高,许涵,邹建平,贲春丽,史欣,曹国松.广东大峡谷常绿阔叶林主要植物种间关系、生态位及其群落稳定性研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(6):695~704

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:123
  • 下载次数: 184
  • HTML阅读次数: 98
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-03
  • 最后修改日期:2024-01-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-12
文章二维码
您是第 位访问者
主管单位：中国科学院
主办单位：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
地址：广州市天河区兴科路723号 中国科学院华南植物园 《热带亚热带植物学报》编辑部
电话：86 (0)20-3725 2514
热带亚热带植物学报 ® 2025 版权所有