山豆根叶片光合特性对光强和干旱的响应
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(31960054)资助


Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics to Light Intensity and Drought of Euchresta japonica Leaves
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    山豆根(Euchresta japonica)为我国II级重点保护野生植物。该研究通过设置不同遮阴网的层数和采用不同浓度的聚乙二醇溶液浇灌,探讨了山豆根光合特性对光强和干旱的响应。结果表明, 山豆根叶片的饱和光强为683.06~907.07mmol/(m2·s); 单层遮阴处理叶片的最大电子传递速率和最大净光合速率整体高于双层遮阴处理,其中单层遮阴且未进行干旱处理的叶片最大电子传递速率和最大净光合速率最高,分别为55.36和6.73mmol/(m2·s);相同遮阴条件下,叶片的最大净光合速率及其对应的饱和光强均随干旱程度增加整体呈下降趋势;单层遮阴条件下的蒸腾速率和水分利用效率均整体高于双层遮阴条件下的。不同处理下叶片光系统II的实际光化学效率、光化学猝灭系数以及非光化学猝灭系数等整体上均无显著差异(P>0.05)。山豆根属半阳生植物,其叶片利用弱光能力较强,植株具有较强的耐干旱能力。因此,建议在开展野外回归、迁地保护、人工栽培等工作时,进行适当遮阴处理并保持充足的土壤含水量。

    Abstract:

    Euchresta japonica is a Class II key protected wild plant in China. The response of photosynthetic characteristics to light intensity and drought was studied by setting different layers of shade nets and watering with different concentrations of polyethylene glycol solution. The results showed that the saturated light intensity of E. japonica leaves was 683.06~907.07 mmol/(m2·s). The maximum electron transfer rates (ETRmax) and the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pnmax) under single layer shading were higher than those under double layer shading. The ETRmax and Pnmax under single layer shading without drought were the highest of 55.36 and 6.73 mmol/(m2·s), respectively. Under the same shading condition, the Pnmax and the corresponding saturated light intensity of E. japonica decreased with the increase of drought degree. The transpiration rate and water use efficiency under single layer shading were higher than those under double layer shading. The actual photochemical efficiency, photochemical quenching coefficient and non-photochemical quenching coefficient of photosystem II of E. japonica leaves showed no significant difference among different treatments (P>0.05). Euchresta japonica is a semi-sunny plant, whose leaves whose leaves can take advantage of weak light and its plants have strong drought tolerance. Therefore, it is suggested that proper shading and adequate soil water content should be maintained during field return, ex situ conservation and artificial cultivation.

    参考文献
    [1] Editorial Committee of Flora of Zhejiang (New Edition). Flora of Zhejiang New Edition, Vol. 5 [M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science & Technology Press, 2021: 233-234. [《浙江植物志(新编)》编辑委员会. 浙江植物志新编, 第5卷 [M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 2021: 233-234.]
    [2] LI M H, QIU R L, DAI B A, et al. Study on matrine injection, an anticancer component of Sophora tonkinensis [J]. Chin Trad Patent Med, 1981(3): 36-38. [何明焕, 邱荣梁, 戴保安, 等. 广豆根抗癌成分苦参碱注射液的研究 [J]. 中成药研究, 1981(3): 36-38.]
    [3] LI X X. A survey of the research on Sophora tonkinensis [J]. J Shandong Univ Trad Chin Med, 2000, 24(3): 235. [李希新. 广豆根的研究概况 [J]. 山东中医药大学学报, 2000, 24(3): 235.]
    [4] LING Z Z, QIN W L, ZHAO W H, et al. Cutting propagation of Sophora tonkinensis [J]. J Chin Med Mat, 2005, 28(9): 750-751. [凌征柱, 覃文流, 赵维合, 等. 山豆根扦插繁殖 [J]. 中药材, 2005, 28(9): 750-751. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4454.2005.09.003.]
    [5] LI X, GAO J M, GONG Q H. Advances in pharmacological effects and toxicity of Subprostrate sophorais [J]. World Chin Med, 2022, 17(5): 743-747. [李曦, 高健美, 龚其海. 山豆根药理作用及毒性研究进展 [J]. 世界中医药, 2022, 17(5): 743-747. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202. 2022.05.025.]
    [6] Editorial Committee of Flora of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Vol. 42 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1998: 384. [中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志, 第42卷 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 384.]
    [7] JI L Z, XIAO D M, WANG M. Effects of simulated water stress on photosynthesis rate and WUE of Fraxinus mandshurica [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2005, 16(3): 408-412. [姬兰柱, 肖冬梅, 王淼. 模拟水分胁迫对水曲柳光合速率及水分利用效率的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(3): 408-412.]
    [8] REZAI S, ETEMADI N, NIKBAKHT A, et al. Effect of light intensity on leaf morphology, photosynthetic capacity, and chlorophyll content in sage (Salvia officinalis L.) [J]. Kor J Hort Sci Technol, 2018, 36(1): 46-57. doi: 10.12972/kjhst.20180006.
    [9] HIGASHIUCHI K, UNO Y, KUROKI S, et al. Effect of light intensity and light/dark period on iridoids in Hedyotis diffusa [J]. Environ Control Biol, 2016, 54(2): 109-116. doi: 10.2525/ecb.54.109.
    [10] LI A M, LI S H, WU X J, et al. Effect of light intensity on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and accumulation of flavonoids in Lithocarpus litseifolius (Hance) Chun. (Fagaceae) [J]. Open J For, 2016, 6(5): 445-459. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2016.65034.
    [11] ZHAN J C, HUANG W D, WANG L J. Research of weak light stress physiology in plants [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(1): 43-50. [战吉宬, 黄卫东, 王利军. 植物弱光逆境生理研究综述 [J]. 植物学通报, 2003, 20(1): 43-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2003.01.005.]
    [12] MATOS F S, WOLFGRAMM R, GONÇALVES F V, et al. Phenotypic plasticity in response to light in the coffee tree [J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2009, 67(2): 421-427. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.018.
    [13] Compilation Committee of Records of Wuyanling Nature Reserve. District Annals of Wuyanling Nature Reserve [M]. Beijing: China Times Economic Press, 2014: 46-146. [《乌岩岭自然保护区志》编纂委员会. 乌岩岭自然保护区志 [M]. 北京: 中櫽?槣珏獎滺???????????财??名??そ?ぢ????戴牝?LIU L, LIU S M, SUN B Y. Research of the photosynthetic characteristics of Zanthoxylum bungeanum seedlings in different producing areas [J]. Acta Agric Boreali-Occid Sin, 2009, 18(3): 160-165. [刘玲, 刘淑明, 孙丙寅. 不同产地花椒幼苗光合特性研究 [J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(3): 160-165. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2009.03.036.]
    [15] YE Z P. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa [J]. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45(4): 637-640. doi: 10.1007/s11099-007-0110-5.
    [16] YE Z P, ROBAKOWSKI P, SUGGETT D J. A mechanistic model for the light response of photosynthetic electron transport rate based on light harvesting properties of photosynthetic pigment molecules [J]. Planta, 2013, 237(3): 837-847. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1790-z.
    [17] YE Z P, SUGGETT D J, ROBAKOWSKI P, et al. A mechanistic model for the photosynthesis-light response based on the photosynthetic electron transport of photosystem II in C3 and C4 species [J]. New Phytol, 2013, 199(1): 110-120. doi: 10.1111/nph.12242.
    [18] LIU J L, XIA L Z, ZHENG W C, et al. Response of photosynthetic physiology of Bretschneidera sinensis seedlings to different soil water contents [J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2015, 35(6): 15-19. [刘菊莲, 夏丽芝, 郑伟成, 等. 伯乐树幼苗对不同土壤含水量的生理生态响应 [J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(6): 15-19. doi: 10.14067/j. cnki.1673-923x.2015.06.004.]
    [19] DING Y H. Prediction of Environmental Change in Western China, Vol. 2 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002: 16-44. [丁一汇. 中国西部环境演变评估, 第2卷 中国西部环境变化的预测 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 16-44.]
    [20] WANG H, WANG B T, WANG T, et al. Effects of different water moisture on photosynthesis and transpiration of potted Prunus sibirica seedlings [J]. N Hort, 2010(2): 1-5. [王红, 王百田, 王婷, 等. 不同土壤含水量对山杏盆栽幼苗蒸腾速率和光合速率的影响 [J]. 北方园艺, 2010(2): 1-5.]
    [21] ZHANG Q, ZHANG H S, LIU S M, et al. Identification of drought resistance of different high-yield maize cultivars [J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2012, 28(30): 125-130. [张倩, 张洪生, 刘淑梅, 等. 不同高产玉米品种抗旱性的比较研究 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(30): 125-130. doi: 10.3969/
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘西,牛正文,徐佳鑫,雷祖培,潘向东,彭春菊,康华靖,叶子飘.山豆根叶片光合特性对光强和干旱的响应[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2024,32(3):427~434

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:97
  • 下载次数: 3336
  • HTML阅读次数: 3210
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-13
  • 最后修改日期:2022-11-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-04
文章二维码