澳门路环华润楠古树的物候及所属群落特征
作者:
基金项目:

中国科学院华南植物园-澳门合作项目;广东省科技计划项目(2018B030324003);国家自然科学基金项目(31870699)资助


Studies on the Phenology and Community Characteristics of an Ancient Tree Machilus chinensis in Ilha Coloane, Macao
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为加强对澳门华润楠(Machilus chinensis)的保育工作,对最古老的1株华润楠和群落优势种绒毛润楠(M.velutina)进行物候监测,并采用样地调查法对群落的物种组成、结构和物种多样性进行了分析。结果表明,2—3月为华润楠新叶生长盛期,3月中下旬为花期,果期由4月持续到9月;4—5月为绒毛润楠展叶盛期,10—12月为花期,12月至翌年3月为果期。2 000 m²的样地中共记录到维管植物104种,隶属于48科82属。种子植物区系以热带分布为主,占总区系成分的87.01%。乔木层的华润楠虽然只有1株高大古树,但其以18.97%的重要值排在所有树种中的第4位,灌木层的华润楠(平均高度20 cm以下的幼苗)以37.06%的重要值排第2位,绒毛润楠为乔木层和灌木层明显的优势树种。群落垂直结构的物种多样性格局表现为:物种丰富度指数为乔木层>灌木层>草本层>藤本层;均匀度指数为藤本层>草本层>乔木层>灌木层;多样性指数DH'最高的均为草本层,最低的均为灌木层。因此,该群落属于亚热带性质常绿阔叶林,物种组成相对丰富,华润楠古树生长正常,但种群不稳定,应加强保护。

    Abstract:

    In order to strengthen conservation of Machilus chinensis, the oldest species in Macao, the phenology of M. chinensis and M. velutina, the dominant species in the community, was monitored, the species composition, structure and species diversity of the community were studied by using sample plot method. The results showed that February to March was the peak growth period of new leaves of M. chinensis, the flowering period was from mid to late March,and the fruit period last from April to June. The peak period of new leaves of M. velutina was from April to May, the flowering period was from October to December, and the fruiting period was from December to March of the following year. There were 104 vascular species recorded in the plot of 2 000 m², belonging to 82 genera and 48 families. The flora of seed plants of the community was dominated by Tropical distribution type, accounting for 87.01% of the total flora. Although there was only one tall ancient tree M. chinensis in arbor layer, its importance value of 18.97% ranked the fourth among all tree species. And Machilus chinensis (seedlings with average height below 20 cm) ranked second with an important value of 37.06% in the shrub layer. Machilus velutina was the dominant tree species in arbor and shrub layers. The species abundance index was arbor layer>shrub layer>herb layer>liana; the evenness index was liana>herb layer>arbor layer> shrub layer. The Shannon-Wiener and Simpson indexes of herb layer were the highest, and those of shrub layer were the lowest. So, the community belongs to the subtropical evergreen broad forest, the species composition is relatively rich, the growth of ancient tree Machilus chinensis is normal, but the population is unstable, protection should be strengthened.

    参考文献
    [1] Deletis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tomus 31[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1982:59-60. 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志,第31卷[M].北京:科学出版社, 1982:59-60.
    [2] WU Y, MA H Y, TIAN H J, et al. Photosynthetic responses of Machilus chinensis to traffic pollution and industrial pollution[J]. Tianjin Agric Sci, 2018, 24(5):13-16. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2018.05.004. 伍勇,马洪洋,田海娟,等.华润楠对交通污染和工业污染的光合生理响应[J].天津农业科学, 2018, 24(5):13-16. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1006-6500.2018.05.004.
    [3] XING F W, PAN Y H, LIU D M, et al. The charm of trees:Ancient and precious tress in Macao[M]. Macau:Instituto para os Assuntos Cívicos e Municipais, 2013:60-63. 邢福武,潘永华,刘东明,等.树载濠情——澳门古树名木[M].澳门:澳门特别行政区民政总署园林绿化部, 2013:60-63.
    [4] Leong M L. Spatial development of the village of coloane in Macau:Case with Hac Sa village[D]. Quanzhou:Huaqiao University, 2013. 梁美莲.澳门路环村落空间发展研究——以黑沙村为例[D].泉州:华侨大学, 2013.
    [5] FITCHETT J M, GRAB S W, THOMPSON D I. Plant phenology and climate change:Progress in methodological approaches and application[J]. Prog Phys Geogr, 2015, 39(4):460-482. doi:10.1177/0309133315578940.
    [6] FANG J Y, WANG X P, SHEN Z H, et al. Methods and protocols for plant community inventory[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(6):533-548. 方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等.植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J].生物多样性, 2009, 17(6):533-548.
    [7] DAI W J, JIN H Y, ZHANG Y H, et al. Advances in plant phenology[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(19):6705-6719. doi:10.5846/stxb201909252007. 代武君,金慧颖,张玉红,等.植物物候学研究进展[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(19):6705-6719. doi:10.5846/stxb201909252007.
    [8] WANG L. Study on plant phenology of representative plant commu-nities in Macau[D]. Guangzhou:Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2014. 王琳.澳门代表性群落植物物候研究[D].广州:仲恺农业工程学院, 2014.
    [9] LI S J. Ornamental value evaluation and phenological mapping of autumn colorful plants in Xi'an[D]. Yangling:Northwest Agricultural& Forestry University, 2013. 李淑娟.西安秋季色叶植物物候图谱构建及观赏性评价[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2013.
    [10] ZHAI J, YUAN F H, Wu J B. Research progress on vegetation phenol-logical changes[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34(11):3237-3243. doi:10. 13292/j.1000-4890.20151023.030. 翟佳,袁凤辉,吴家兵.植物物候变化研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2015, 34(11):3237-3243. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.20151023.030.
    [11] WANG X R, PANG H D, HU W J, et al. Phenology research on the common ligneous species in Wuhan urban forest:An example of Jiufeng National Forest Park[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2020, 36(10):39-46. 王晓荣,庞宏东,胡文杰,等.武汉城市森林常见木本植物物候研究——以九峰国家森林公园为例[J].中国农学通报, 2020, 36(10):39-46.
    [12] SHU Y, LIU Y J. Research overview on phytocoenology[J]. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2008, 20(6):51-54. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2008.06.016. 舒勇,刘扬晶.植物群落学研究综述[J].江西农业学报, 2008, 20(6):51-54. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2008.06.016.
    [13] ZHU H. Tropical flora of southern China[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2017, 25(2):204-217. doi:10.17520/biods.2016055. 朱华.中国南部热带植物区系[J].生物多样性, 2017, 25(2):204-217. doi:10.17520/biods.2016055.
    [14] XING F W, QIN X S, YAN Y H. The flora of Macau[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2003, 23(4):472-477. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2003.04.022. 邢福武,秦新生,严岳鸿.澳门的植物区系[J].植物研究, 2003, 23(4):472-477. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5102.2003.04.022.
    [15] WU Z Y. The areal-types of Chinese genera of seed plants[J]. Acta Bot Yunnan, 1991(S1):1-139. 吴征镒.中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J].云南植物研究, 1991(S1):1-139.
    [16] LI X W. Floristic statistics and analyses of seed plants from China[J]. Acta Bot Yunnan, 1996, 18(4):363-384. 李锡文.中国种子植物区系统计分析[J].云南植物研究, 1996, 18(4):363-384.
    [17] HAN L. The dynamics of vegetation and ecological characteristics of dominant populations for desert riparian forest in the upper reaches of Tarim River[D]. Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2014. 韩路.塔里木河上游荒漠河岸林植物群落动态与优势种群生态特征研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2014.
    [18] WANG F J, DING F B. A review of research on plant community species diversity[J]. Contemp Hort, 2015(8):155. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1006-4958.2015.08.126. 王凤娟,丁福波.植物群落物种多样性研究综述[J].现代园艺, 2015(8):155. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4958.2015.08.126.
    [19] HE B, LI Q, LIU Y. Community characteristics and species diversity of Pinus armandii in Caohai National Nature Reserve[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2020, 28(1):44-52. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4063. 何斌,李青,刘勇.草海国家级自然保护区华山松群落特征及物种多样性研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(1):44-52. doi:10. 11926/jtsb.4063.
    [20] WANG D B, JI S Y, CHEN F P. A review on the species diversity of plant community[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2001, 20(4):55-60. 汪殿蓓,暨淑仪,陈飞鹏.植物群落物种多样性研究综述[J].生态学杂志, 2001, 20(4):55-60.
    [21] TANG C Y, Song X L, HONG B Y, et al. Characteristics of the coastal plant community and ecological restoration proposal on Ka Ho Hill, Macau[J]. Plant Sci J, 2015, 33(1):44-52. doi:10.11913/PSJ. 2095-0837.2015.10044. 唐春艳,宋贤利,洪宝莹,等.澳门九澳山海滨群落特征分析与生态恢复建议[J].植物科学学报, 2015, 33(1):44-52. doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.10044.
    [22] SONG X L, XING F W, YI Q F, et al. Characteristics and species diversity of Cinnamomum burmannii community on Song Mountain, Macao[J]. J Fujian For Sci Technol, 2013, 40(3):1-7. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1002-7351.2013.03.01. 宋贤利,邢福武,易绮婓,等.澳门松山阴香群落特征及物种多样性研究[J].福建林业科技, 2013, 40(3):1-7. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1002-7351.2013.03.01.
    [23] ZHAO S S, ZENG Q W, Xing F W. Characteristics and species diversity of Macaranga tanarius community on Ilha Verde Hill of Macau[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2010, 38(6):3243-3248. doi:10.3969/j. issn.0517-6611.2010.06.173. 赵珊珊,曾庆文,邢福武.澳门青洲山血桐群落特征及物种多样性研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(6):3243-3248. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 0517-6611.2010.06.173.
    [24] HUANG L J, Zhang R J, WANG F G, et al. Characteristics of Mallo-tus paniculatus+Sterculia lanceolata+Microcos paniculata community in Ilha Verde Hill, Macau[J]. J Wuhan Bot Res, 2010, 28(1):81-89. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.10081. 黄柳菁,张荣京,王发国,等.澳门青洲山白楸+假苹婆+破布叶群落特征研究[J].武汉植物学研究, 2010, 28(1):81-89. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.10081.
    [25] ZENG F, ZHANG R J, XING F W, et al. Community characteristics and species diversity research of Pterospermum heterophyllum commu-nity in Ilha Verde Hill, Macau[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2009, 29(8):1684-1691. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2009.08.029. 曾凤,张荣京,邢福武,等.澳门青洲山翻白叶树群落特征及物种多样性研究[J].西北植物学报, 2009, 29(8):1684-1691. doi:10. 3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2009.08.029.
    [26] Liao H X, Luo W B, Pal R, et al. Context-dependency and the effects of species diversity on ecosystem function[J]. Biol Invas, 2016, 18(10):3063-3079. doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1202-6.
    [27] DO NASCIMENTO L M, DE SÁ BARRETTO S E V, RODAL M J N, et al. Secondary succession in a fragmented Atlantic forest landscape:Evidence of structural and diversity convergence along a chrono-sequence[J]. J For Res, 2014, 19(6):501-513. doi:10.1007/s10310-014-0441-6.
    [28] PENG S J, HUANG Z L, PENG S L, et al. Factors influencing mortality of seed and seedling in plant nature regeneration process[J]. Guihaia, 2004, 24(2):113-121. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2004.02. 004. 彭闪江,黄忠良,彭少麟,等.植物天然更新过程中种子和幼苗死亡的影响因素[J].广西植物, 2004, 24(2):113-121. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1000-3142.2004.02.004.
    [29] TAN Y B, ZHAN C A, YANG H D, et al. Inter-specific associations among main tree species in Machilus chinensis communities in Nan'ao Island, Guangdong Province[J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2012, 32(11):92-99. doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2012.11.002. 谭一波,詹潮安,杨海东,等.广东南澳岛华润楠群落主要树种种间联结性[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(11):92-99. doi:10. 14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2012.11.002.
    [30] GETZIN S, WIEGAND T, WIEGAND K, et al. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands[J]. J Ecol, 2008, 96(4):807-820. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01377.x.
    [31] ZHU Y, MI X C, Ma k P. A mechanism of plant species coexistence:The negative density-dependent hypothesis[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(6):594-604. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09183. 祝燕,米湘成,马克平.植物群落物种共存机制:负密度制约假说[J].生物多样性, 2009, 17(6):594-604. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009. 09183.
    [32] BROCKERHOFF E G, BARBARO L, CASTAGNEYROL B, et al. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of eco-system services[J]. Biodiv Conserv, 2017, 26(13):3005-3035.
    [33] HONG H J. Eco-environmental sensitivity analysis of Macau[D]. Changsha:Hunan Agricultural University, 2011. 洪鸿加.澳门特别行政区生态环境敏感性分析研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学, 2011
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

林春惠,易绮斐,杜晓洁,王强,顾惠怡.澳门路环华润楠古树的物候及所属群落特征[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2022,30(4):500~508

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:212
  • 下载次数: 452
  • HTML阅读次数: 382
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-16
  • 最后修改日期:2021-09-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-27
  • 出版日期: 2022-07-31
文章二维码