广州红锥-马占相思林物种组成与多样性研究
作者:
基金项目:

广州市野生动植物保护管理办公室项目(SYZFCG-[2017]032);广东省龙眼洞林场项目(Y934111001)资助


Studies on Species Composition and Diversity of Castanopsis hystrix-Acacia mangium Mixed Forest in Guangzhou
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [32]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解广州市龙眼洞林场红锥(Castanopsis hystrix)-马占相思(Acacia mangium)阔叶混交林的群落结构,对其物种多样性进行了分析。结果表明,红锥-马占相思阔叶混交林的物种丰富度依次为乔木层 > 灌木层 > 草本层 > 层间植物层。乔木层的Simpson和Shannon-Wiener指数分别为0.945和0.237,密度为2 671 ind./hm2,红锥、马占相思、三桠苦(Melicope pteleifolia)、山乌桕(Triadica cochinchinensis)和台湾相思(A. confusa)的重要值较高。灌木层中豺皮樟(Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia)、九节(Psychotria asiatica)、黄牛木(Cratoxylum cochinchinense)的重要值超过10%。层间植物的优势科为茜草科(Rubiaceae),其次是夹竹桃科(Apocynaceae)。草本层植物密度约38 000 ind./hm2,以禾本科(Poaceae)占优势,有9种。红锥林从幼龄向中龄过渡,优势种群为增长型,而马占相思林则由近熟龄或成熟龄向过熟龄过渡。对不同区域4种近似林分的比较表明,混交林的生物多样性远远高于人工纯林。因此,红锥-马占相思阔叶混交林已形成了混交复层异龄林结构,乔木层、灌木层和草本层均具有较高的物种丰富度。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the community structure of Castanopsis hystrix and Acacia mangium broad-leaved mixed forest in Longyandong Forest Farm in Guangzhou, its species diversity was analyzed. The results showed that the species richness was in the order of tree layer > shrub layer > herb layer > interlayer plant layer. The Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices of tree layer were 0.945 and 0.237, respectively, with the density of 2 671 ind./hm2. Castanopsis hystrix, A. mangium, Melicope pteleifolia, Triadica cochinchinensis and Acacia confusa had high importance values of 12.79%, 10.98%, 8.08%, 7.78% and 7.02%, respectively. Among the 35 shrub species, the important values of Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia (14.95%), Psychotria asiatica (12.60%) and Cratoxylum cochinchinense (10.17%) were more than 10%. The dominant family of interlayer speciess was Rubiaceae, followed by Apopynaceae. The density of herb species was about 38 000 ind./hm2, and Poaceae was the dominant family, which consists of 9 species. Castanopsis hystrix community was transited from young age to middle age, the dominant population was growth type, while Acacia mangium community was transited from near maturity age or mature age to over maturity age. Compared with similar forests in different region, the biodiversity of mixed forest was much higher than that of pure forest. Therefore, C. hystrix-A. mangium broad-leaved mixed forest had formed the structure of mixed multilayer and different age forest with high species richness in tree layer, shrub layer and herb layer.

    参考文献
    [1] ZHAO G S, LIU J Y, KUANG W H, et al. Disturbance impacts of land use change on biodiversity conservation priority areas across China during 1990-2010[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2014, 69(11):1640-1650. doi:10.11821/dlxb201411005.赵国松, 刘纪远, 匡文慧, 等. 1990-2010年中国土地利用变化对生物多样性保护重点区域的扰动[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11):1640-1650. doi:10.11821/dlxb201411005.
    [2] XU W, MA Z Y, JING X, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem multi-functionality:Advances and perspectives[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(1):55-71. doi:10.17520/biods.2015091. 徐炜, 马志远, 井新, 等. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性:进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(1):55-71. doi:10.17520/biods. 2015091.
    [3] YAO A J, ZHU Q K, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Present situation and prospect of the study on stand structure[J]. For Invent Plan, 2005, 30(2):70-76. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2005.02.018.姚爱静, 朱清科, 张宇清, 等. 林分结构研究现状与展望[J]. 林业调查规划, 2005, 30(2):70-76. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2005. 02.018.
    [4] Whigham D F. Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 2004, 35:583-621. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105708.
    [5] WU J P, LIU Z F, WANG X L, et al. Effects of understory removal and tree girdling on soil microbial community composition and litter decomposition in two Eucalyptus plantations in south China[J]. Funct Ecol, 2011, 25(4):921-931. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01845.x.
    [6] TINYA F, MÁRIALIGETI S, KIRÁLY I, et al. The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in Őrség, Western Hungary[J]. Plant Ecol, 2009, 204(1):69-81. doi:10.1007/s11258-008-9566-z.
    [7] FAN Y S. Effects of structural characteristic factors of typical artificial forest stands on the diversity of understory plants in Qinghai[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019:1-60.樊雨时. 青海典型人工林林分结构特征因子对林下植物多样性的影响[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2019:1-60.
    [8] HÄRDTLE W, MIERWALD U, BEHRENDS T, et al. Pasture land-scapes in Germany:Progress towards sustainable use of agricultural land[M]//REDECKER B, HÄRDTLE W, FINCK P, et al. Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2002:1-30. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55953-2_10.
    [9] WANG L, LIN S, LI Y H, et al. Relationship between understory vegetation and soil moisture in different forest types in Datong, Qinghai Province[J]. Sci Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 17(5):25-35. doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2019.05.004.王莉, 林莎, 李远航, 等. 青海大通不同林地类型林下植被与土壤水分的关系[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(5):25-35. doi:10. 16843/j.sswc.2019.05.004.
    [10] WANG S, MA L, ZHANG D, et al. Plant diversity and soil moisture of artificial Robinia pseudoacacia forest in Loess region of western Shanxi Province[J]. J Beijing Nor Univ (Nat Sci), 2016, 52(3):253-258. doi:10.16360/j.cnki.jbnuns.2016.03.001.王舒, 马岚, 张栋, 等. 晋西黄土区不同林龄人工刺槐林下植被及土壤水分特征[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(3):253-258. doi:10.16360/j.cnki.jbnuns.2016.03.001.
    [11] DANG P. Soil microbial community dynamics following afforestation and its responses to thinning practice of Pinus tabulaeformis on the Loess Plateau[D]. Yangling:Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University, 2018:1-17.党鹏. 黄土高原油松林土壤微生物及其对抚育间伐的响应[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2018:1-17.
    [12] BARBIER S, GOSSELIN F, BALANDIER P. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved:A critical review for temperate and boreal forests[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 254(1):1-15. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038.
    [13] ZHOU J. The influence that management of understory vegetation in semiarid region has in soil moisture of secondary deciduous broad-leaved forest[D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2017:1-48.周婕. 半干旱地区林下植被管理对落叶阔叶次生林土壤水分的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2017:1-48.
    [14] ZHANG Z X, ZHANG S Y, FAN H B, et al. An analysis on fertility of the soils beneath pure and mixed Chinese fir plantations[J]. J Fujian Coll For, 1999, 19(2):181-184. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.1999. 02.022.张志翔, 张思玉, 樊后保, 等. 杉木人工纯林与混交林下土壤肥力分析[J]. 福建林学院学报, 1999, 19(2):181-184. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1001-389X.1999.02.022.
    [15] ZHANG S Y, ZHANG Z X. Comparative analysis of fire hazards in artificial pure forest and mixed forest of Chinese fir, masson pine, and Schima superba[J]. For Fire Preven, 2001, 10(03):27-30. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1002-2511.2001.03.010.张思玉, 张志翔. 杉木马尾松木荷人工纯林与混交林火灾隐患的对比分析[J]. 森林防火, 2001, 10(03):27-30. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2511.2001.03.010.
    [16] HUANG C W. Study on the productivity and soil fertility of mixed forest of Pinus massoniana and Acacia mangium on hills along the coast[J]. Prot For Sci Technol, 2004(4):8-10. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1005-5215.2004.04.003.黄传伟. 沿海丘陵马尾松马占相思混交林生产力和改土效果研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2004(4):8-10. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215. 2004.04.003.
    [17] WEI J. The effect of pure forest and mixed forest on plant diversity and soil fertility in Daqingshan Mountain, Guangxi[D]. Nanning:Guangxi University, 2011:1-73.韦洁. 广西大青山人工纯林和混交林对植物多样性和土壤肥力的影响[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2011:1-73.
    [18] GUO T F. Study on management strategies of Guangdong province Longyandong forest farm[D]. Guangzhou:South China Agricultural University, 2008:1-10.郭天峰. 广东省龙眼洞林场经营管理对策研究[D]. 广州:华南农业大学, 2008:1-10.
    [19] WANG F. Survey on forestland soil of Longyandong forest farm in Guangdong Province[J]. Farm Technol, 2015, (9):18-19. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1003-6989.2015.09.017.王锋. 广东省龙眼洞林场林地土壤调查概况[J]. 农家科技, 2015(9):18-19. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6989.2015.09.017.
    [20] TANG H J. Analysis on climate conditions of urban planning in Guangzhou[J]. Econ Geogr, 2004, 24(4):490-493,576. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2004.04.014.汤惠君. 广州城市规划的气候条件分析[J]. 经济地理, 2004, 24(4):490-493,576. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2004.04.014.
    [21] TAN Y B, SHEN W H, ZHENG W, et al. Species composition and community structure characteristics of Castanopsis hystrix natural forest in Rongxian County, Guangxi Province[J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2015, 35(5):98-102. doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015. 05.017.谭一波, 申文辉, 郑威, 等. 广西容县红锥天然林物种组成与群落结构特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(5):98-102. doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.05.017.
    [22] LIU M, QIU Z J, ZHOU G Y, et al. Undergrowth species diversity of Acacia mangium plantation in Phoenix Mountain, Shenzhen, China[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2007, 23(6):26-31. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1006-4427.2007.06.007.刘敏, 邱治军, 周光益, 等. 深圳凤凰山马占相思林下植物多样性分析[J]. 广东林业科技, 2007, 23(6):26-31. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2007.06.007.
    [23] SHEN W H, HE Q F, ZHENG W, et al. Species composition and diversity of five different forest types in middle Pearl River basin[J]. Guangxi For Sci, 2015, 44(4):325-332. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2015.04.002.申文辉, 何琴飞, 郑威, 等. 珠江流域中游5种不同森林类型物种组成及其多样性[J]. 广西林业科学, 2015, 44(4):325-332. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2015.04.002.
    [24] YE Y C, ZHANG H, CHEN K X, et al. Early effect of thinning on the natural regeneration and species diversity in transformation of planta-tions in Hong Kong[J]. For Environ Sci, 2016, 32(6):1-9. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2016.06.001.叶永昌, 张浩, 陈葵仙, 等. 香港人工林改造对林下植物自然更新和物种多样性的早期影响[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2016, 32(6):1-9. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2016.06.001.
    [25] HUANG X R, CAO Y Y, LU G D, et al. Relating invasive alien species in plantations to dissimilarity of undergrowth vegetation structure[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2020, 28(1):10-16. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4050.黄小荣, 曹艳云, 陆国导, 等. 外来入侵植物与人工林下层植被结构的关联性[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(1):10-16. doi:10. 11926/jtsb.4050.
    [26] NA X Q. Study on aspection plant furnishing of Beijing Wetland Park[D]. Beijing:China Institute of Forestry Sciences, 2015:1-122.那晓铨. 北京湿地公园景观季相变化下的植物配置研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2015:1-122.
    [27] CHEN D P, SUN J X. Discussion on the design principle and plant disposition of forest farm highway and slope greening in mountainous area of Hunan:A case study of highway and slope greening in Longhui Wangyunshan State-owned Forest Farm (Provincial Forest Park)[J]. Contemp Hort, 2016(14):116-117. doi:10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2016.14. 093. 陈东平, 孙俊雄. 湖南山区林场公路及边坡绿化设计原则和植物配置探讨——以隆回望云山国有林场(省级森林公园)公路及边坡绿化为例[J]. 现代园艺, 2016(14):116-117. doi:10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy. 2016.14.093.
    [28] XU S K, XUE L, YANG P, et al. Soil physical and chemical characters of 5 pure stands[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2003, 19(4):27-29. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2003.04.006.许松葵, 薛立, 杨鹏, 等. 马占相思等5种纯林林地土壤理化性质分析[J]. 广东林业科技, 2003, 19(4):27-29. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2003.04.006.
    [29] XU Y X, WANG Z C, ZHU W K, et al. Litterfall and nutrient cycling of Eucalyptus plantation with different ages on Leizhou Peninsula[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2019, 27(4):359-366. doi:10.11926/jtsb.3986.许宇星, 王志超, 竹万宽, 等. 雷州半岛桉树人工林凋落物量和养分循环研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2019, 27(4):359-366. doi:10.11926/jtsb.3986.
    [30] HUANG S D, HUANG Y R, GAO W, et al. Dynamics of litterfall and nutrient return in three typical forests of Wuyi Mountain along altitudinal gradient[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2020, 28(4):394-402. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4146.黄石德, 黄雍容, 高伟, 等. 沿海拔梯度武夷山3种典型森林凋落物及养分归还动态[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(4):394-402. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4146.
    [31] QIU H L. Standardize the management of ecological forest farms and promote the orderly utilization of resources[J]. Jiangxi Agric, 2016(6):46.邱汉莲. 规范生态林场管理促进资源有序利用[J]. 江西农业, 2016(6):46.
    [32] WANG Y C. Lucid water and lush mountains are invaluable assets:On the way to reform and develop state-owned forest farms[J]. State Acad For Adm J, 2016, 15(1):9-13. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-2880.2016.01. 002.王延成. 绿水青山就是金山银山——浅谈国有林场改革发展之路[J]. 国家林业局管理干部学院学报, 2016, 15(1):9-13. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.2095-2880.2016.01.002.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

廖宇杰,洪维,陈富强,张干荣,李仕裕,李志宏,庄晓纯,邢福武,王发国.广州红锥-马占相思林物种组成与多样性研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2021,29(5):494~502

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:559
  • 下载次数: 579
  • HTML阅读次数: 368
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-14
  • 最后修改日期:2021-01-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-23
文章二维码