滨海防护林木麻黄和花吊丝竹混交林群落的种间关联和生态位分析
作者:
基金项目:

福建省区域发展项目(2015N3015);福建省科技创新团队项目(2018[49]);福建农林大学科技创新发展基金项目(CXZX2017089);福建省科技重大专项(2013NZ0001)资助


Interspecific Association and Niche of Mixed Forest Communities of Casuarina equisetifolia and Dendrocalamus minor var. amoenus in the Windbreak of Sandy Coast
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解东山岛滨海防护林木麻黄(Casuarina equisetifolia)和花吊丝竹(Dendrocalamus minor var. amoenus)混交林群落的稳定性,采用样方法调查分析群落的种间关联和生态位。结果表明,群落总体的种间联结呈现不显著的正关联(VR=1.72,W=20.625),表明群落处于不稳定的动态演替状态。花吊丝竹和马缨丹(Lantana camara)、梵天花(Urena procumbens)和木麻黄表现出非常紧密的关联性和共现性(PC≥0.7,OI≥0.8,DI≥0.8)。马缨丹等外来植物生态位宽度较高,与花吊丝竹具有较高的生态位重叠,从而与花吊丝竹具有较高的正联结,使得群落处于不稳定状态。滨海防护林生境单一,优势物种习性相似,使花吊丝竹与多数物种形成强的正关联。受到环境资源的限制,强的正关联与物种生态位宽度较大有关。种对间强的正关联以及外来物种潜在的生存优势可能是影响群落稳定性的重要因素。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the stability of mixed forest community of Casuarina equisetifolia and Dendrocalamus minor var. amoenus in the coastal windbreak of Dongshan Island, China, the inter-specific association and niche of the community was analyzed by using quadrat method. The results showed that there was no significant positive correlation among inter-specific associations as a whole (VR=1.72, W=20.625), indicating that the community was in an unstable dynamic succession state. Two species pairs; D. minor var. amoenus and Lantana camara, U. procumbens and C. equisetifolia had high association and co-occurrence (PC ≥ 0.7, OI ≥ 0.8, DI ≥ 0.8). The niche width of invasive plant L. camara was high, and the niche overlap with D. minor var. amoenus was high, showing high positive correlation, making the population in an unstable state. The habitats of the coastal windbreak was simple, and the habits of dominant species were similar, so there was a strong positive interspecific association between D. minor var. amoenus and other most species. Restricted by environmental resources, the strong positive association was related to the large niche width of species. The strong positive interspecific association of species pairs and the potential competitive advantage of alien species might be an important factor affecting the stability of the community.

    参考文献
    [1] XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233. doi:10.5846/stxb201505311092.徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233. doi:10.5846/stxb201505311092.
    [2] LIU X Y, HE D, TIAN W B, et al. Patterns of species associations in woody plants in forest communities of Putuoshan Island, Zhejiang, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(12):1219-1227. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2017.0170.刘翔宇, 何东, 田文斌, 等. 浙江普陀山岛森林木本植物的种间关联格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12):1219-1227. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2017.0170.
    [3] DUAN H L, ZHAO A, YAO Z. Species relationship among typical marshland plants in Poyang Lake region on different sample scale[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2018, 26(5):449-456. doi:10.11926/jtsb.3862.段后浪, 赵安, 姚忠. 不同样方尺度下鄱阳湖湿地典型草洲植物种间关联性[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2018, 26(5):449-456. doi:10. 11926/jtsb.3862.
    [4] WEI S G, LI L, XU R, et al. Spatial pattern and interspecific relation-ship of dominant species in plant community in Jinggang Mountain[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2015, 23(1):74-80. doi:10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2015.01.011.魏识广, 李林, 许睿, 等. 井冈山植物群落优势种空间分布格局与种间关联[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2015, 23(1):74-80. doi:10. 11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2015.01.011.
    [5] CÁRDENAS R E, VALENCIA R, KRAFT N J B, et al. Plant traits predict inter- and intra-specific variation in susceptibility to herbivory in a hyperdiverse Neotropical rain forest tree community[J]. J Ecol, 2014, 102(4):939-952. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12255.
    [6] LI X, LIAO L N, YANG H P, et al. Spatial pattern of woody plants in artificial mixed forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Mytilaria laosensis[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2019, 39(10):1842-1850. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2019.10.1842.李宪, 廖良宁, 杨海鹏, 等. 杉木与米老排人工混交林群落木本植物空间格局研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39(10):1842-1850. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2019.10.1842.
    [7] LUO J F, ZHENG J M, ZHOU J X, et al. Analysis of the interspecific associations present in an alpine meadow community undergoing reve-getation on the railway-construction affected land of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(20):6528-6537. doi:10.5846/stxb 201502030276.罗久富, 郑景明, 周金星, 等. 青藏高原高寒草甸区铁路工程迹地植被恢复过程的种间关联性[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(20):6528-6537. doi:10.5846/stxb201502030276.
    [8] XUE O, WEI T X. Interspecific association among understory species of the low-efficiency plantation in the Jiufeng National Forest Park[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2016, 36(0):34-42. doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2016. 01.005.薛鸥, 魏天兴. 鹫峰国家森林公园低效人工林林下植物种间关联[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(1):34-42. doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102. 2016.01.005.
    [9] SHANG T Q, YE N N, GAO H Q, et al. Community structure analysis of a public welfare forest based on multivariate regression trees[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2018, 53(2):238-249. doi:10.11983/CBB17088.商天其, 叶诺楠, 高海卿, 等. 基于多元回归树的公益林群落结构解析[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(2):238-249. doi:10.11983/CBB17088.
    [10] Office of Leading Group for Comprehensive Survey of Coastal Zone and Tidar Resources of Fujian Province. Comprehensive Survey Report on Coastal Zone and Tidar Resources of Fujian Province[M]. Beijing:Ocean Press, 1990:1-575.福建省海岸带和海涂资源综合调查领导小组办公室. 福建省海岸带和海涂资源综合调查报告[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 1990:1-575.
    [11] LIN W X, ZHU W, NIE S, et al. Preliminary study on introduction and application of local tree species in coastal zone of Taiwan island[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(13):59-65. doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2903.林武星, 朱炜, 聂森, 等. 台湾海岸乡土树种引进应用的初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(13):59-65. doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2903.
    [12] LIN A Y. Vegetation characteristics of four types of protection forests on sandy coast in Fujian[J]. J Fujian Agric For Univ (Nat Sci), 2018, 47(1):66-73. doi:10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2018.01.011.林爱玉. 福建沿海沙地4种防护林类型的群落学特征[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 47(1):66-73. doi:10.13323/j.cnki. j.fafu(nat.sci.).2018.01.011.
    [13] YUAN Z L, WEI B L, CHEN Y, et al. How do similarities in spatial distributions and interspecific associations affect the coexistence of Quercus species in the Baotianman National Nature Reserve, Henan, China[J]. Ecol Evol, 2018, 8(5):2580-2593. doi:10.1002/ece3.3863.
    [14] WU L D, LI T T, FU G L, et al. Niche and interspecific relationship of the wild plant Styrax zhejiangensis with extremely small population[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2020, 46(4):459-474. doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2019.08.263.吴霖东, 李婷婷, 傅国林, 等. 极小种群野生植物浙江安息香的生态位和种间关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(4):459-474. doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2019.08.263.
    [15] ZHENG J M, CHEN X Y, CHEN L G, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil quality at different stand densities of Dendrocalamus minor var. amoenus plantations[J]. Appl Ecol Environ Res, 2020, 18(4):5985-5996. doi:10.15666/aeer/1804_59855996.
    [16] HE T Y, FAN L L, TARIN M W K, et al. Physiological and proteomic responses of Dendrocalamus minor var. amoenus (ghost bamboo) under drought stress[J]. Appl Ecol Environ Res, 2020, 18(4):4817-4838. doi:10.15666/aeer/1804_48174838.
    [17] JIANG H, ZHANG H, LONG W X, et al. Interspecific associations and niche characteristics of communities invaded by Decalobanthus boisianus[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(4):388-399. doi:10.17520/biods. 2019007.江焕, 张辉, 龙文兴, 等. 金钟藤入侵群落的种间联结及生态位特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4):388-399. doi:10.17520/biods.2019007.
    [18] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3):998-1005. doi:10.2307/1938071.
    [19] GREIG-SMITH P. Quantitative Plant Ecology[M]. London:Butter-worths, 1957:1-359.
    [20] GODRON M. Some aspects of heterogeneity in grasslands of Cantal[J]. Stat Ecol, 1972, (3):397-415.
    [21] ZHENG Y R. Comparison of methods for studying stability of forest community[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2000, 36(5):28-32. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2000.05.005.郑元润. 森林群落稳定性研究方法初探[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(5):28-32. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2000.05.005.
    [22] LEVINS R. Evolution in Changing Environments:Some Theoretical Explorations (MPB-2)[M]. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1968.
    [23] SCHOENER T W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities[J]. Science, 1974, 185(4145):27-39. doi:10.1126/science.185.4145.27.
    [24] PIANKA E R. The structure of lizard communities[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1973, 4:53-74. doi:10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.04.110173.000413.
    [25] QUEENBOROUGH S A, BURSLEM D F R P, GARWOOD N C, et al. Habitat niche partitioning by 16 species of Myristicaceae in Amazonian Ecuador[J]. Plant Ecol, 2007, 192(2):193-207. doi:10.1007/s11258-007-9328-3.
    [26] WANG B S, PENG S L. Studies on the measuring techniques of interspecific association of lower subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests:I. The exploration and the revision on the measuring formulas of interspecific association[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 1985(4):274-285.王伯荪, 彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究:I. 种间联结测式的探讨与修正[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1985(4):274-285.
    [27] YANG Q S, LIU H M, ZHU T T, et al. Interspecies associations and species-habitat associations in the evergreen broad-leaved forest of Tiantong National Forest Park, Zhejiang[J]. J E China Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2020(2):110-119. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.201931004.杨庆松, 刘何铭, 朱彤彤, 等. 浙江天童国家森林公园常绿阔叶林种间关联和种-生境关联[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020(2):110-119. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.201931004.
    [28] CHAI Y F, YUE M. Research advances in plant community assembly mechanisms[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(15):4557-4572. doi:10.5846/stxb201501140114.柴永福, 岳明. 植物群落构建机制研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15):4557-4572. doi:10.5846/stxb201501140114.
    [29] ZHANG D M, ZHAO W Z, LUO W C. Niche and interspecific association of dominant plant species in saline-alkaline soils of desert steppe zone[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(5):1307-1315. doi:10.13292/j. 1000-4890.201805.027.张东梅, 赵文智, 罗维成. 荒漠草原带盐碱地优势植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5):1307-1315. doi:10.13292/j. 1000-4890.201805.027.
    [30] TIE J, LI Y F, JIN S, et al. Niche characteristics of dominant tree species in Macaca mulatta habitat of Lishan National Nature Reserve, Shanxi[J] Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34(3):634-641. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2015.0087.铁军, 李燕芬, 金山, 等. 山西历山国家级自然保护区猕猴栖息地优势树种生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3):634-641. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2015.0087.
    [31] HU Z H, QIAN H Y, YU M J. The niche of dominant species populations in Castanopsis eyrei forest in Gutian Mountain National Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(7):3670-3677. doi:10. 3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.07.027.胡正华, 钱海源, 于明坚. 古田山国家级自然保护区甜槠林优势种群生态位[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(7):3670-3677. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.07.027.
    [32] LI H M, CAO T T, GU M Z, et al. The special bacterial metabolites and allelopathic potentials in Casuarina equisetifolia woodland of different stand ages[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2016, 22(5):808-814. doi:10. 3724/SP.J.1145.2016.01021.李慧敏, 曹婷婷, 顾美子, 等. 不同林龄木麻黄林地特有细菌代谢产物及其化感潜力[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016, 22(5):808-814. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2016.01021.
    [33] RANJAN R. Deriving double dividends through linking payments for ecosystem services to environmental entrepreneurship:The case of the invasive weed Lantana camara[J]. Ecol Econ, 2019, 164:106380. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2019.106380.
    [34] MISHRA A. Allelopathic properties of Lantana camara[J]. Int Res J Basic Clin Stud, 2015(3):13-28. doi:10.14303/irjbcs.2014.048.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

郑俊鸣,李敏,张盟,Tarin Muhammad WaqqasKhan,何天友,陈凌艳,陈礼光,洪小龙,郑郁善.滨海防护林木麻黄和花吊丝竹混交林群落的种间关联和生态位分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2021,29(5):465~473

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:431
  • 下载次数: 508
  • HTML阅读次数: 514
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-03
  • 最后修改日期:2021-01-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-23
文章二维码