乐昌含笑不同家系的叶形态与生长差异分析
作者:
基金项目:

中央财政林业科技推广示范项目([2019]GDTK-03)资助


Analysis of Leaf Morphology and Growth Differences among Michelia chapensis Families
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解乐昌含笑(Michelia chapensis)叶形态和生长性状的家系变异特征,对15个家系的叶形态性状和生长指标及其相关性进行了分析。结果表明,乐昌含笑叶片形态在家系间和家系内均存在显著差异,不同家系间以帽子峰家系叶形态的平均变异系数最大(23.55%),乐九5家系的最小(12.63%);不同叶形态性状间以干物质质量的变异系数最大(25.50%),叶柄长宽比的最小(5.14%);树冠浓密度、胸径和树高在家系内的变异比家系间的显著。相关分析表明,叶长与叶宽、叶干物质质量与叶面积之间均呈显著正相关关系(P<0.05)。根据聚类分析结果,15个家系可分为4类,第I类家系具有树冠浓密、树体高大等特征;第II、III类家系具有树冠较稀疏且树体较矮小等特征;第IV类家系具有树冠较稀疏但树体较高大等特征。因此,这为乐昌含笑树种的合理开发利用提供了理论依据。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the variability of leaf characters and growth traits among different families of Michelia chapensis, the leaf morphology, growth indexes and their correlations of 15 families were analyzed. The results showed that there were significant differences in leaf characters among M. chapensis families. The coefficient of variation (CV) of leaf characters in Maozifeng family was the largest (23.55%) among 15 families, and that in lejiu5 family was the smallest (12.63%). Among seven leaf characters, the CV of dry matter mass was the largest (25.50%), and that of petiole length-width ratio was the smallest (5.14%). The variation of crown density, DBH and tree height (H) within families was more significant than that between families. The correlation analysis showed that leaf length had significant positive correlation with leaf width (P<0.05), as well as the correlation between leaf dry matter mass and leaf area. According to cluster analysis, 15 families could be divided into 4 categories. The families in category I had dense crown and tall tree, those in categories II and III had sparse crown and short tree, and those in category IV had sparse crown but tall tree. Therefore, these would provide a theoretical basis for the rational development and utilization of M. chapensis.

    参考文献
    [1] ZHANG W H, WANG R H, ZHEGN H Q, et al. Multi-site family trials and selection of superior families for Michelia chapensis[J]. J Zhe-jiang Agric For Univ, 2015, 32(5):763-769. doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.016.张伟红, 王润辉, 郑会全, 等. 乐昌含笑优树多点子代测定及优良家系选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5):763-769. doi:10. 11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.016.
    [2] MA L, WU L F, YE H G, et al. Studies on community characteristics of Michelia chapensis in Yejingbei, Zengcheng, Guangzhou[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2012, 20(2):169-176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012. 02.011.马磊, 吴林芳, 叶华谷, 等. 广州增城叶迳背乐昌含笑林群落特征研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2012, 20(2):169-176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012.02.011.
    [3] WANG R H, ZHANG W H, ZHEGN H Q, et al. Study on mutil-site provenance trials and superior provenances selection of Michelia chapensis[J]. J CS For Technol, 2015, 35(5):16-21,34. doi:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.05.003.王润辉, 张伟红, 郑会全, 等. 乐昌含笑多点种源试验与优良种源选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(5):16-21,34. doi:10. 14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.05.003.
    [4] ZOU S M, YAN S, WANG R H, et al. Study on early trials of Michelia chapensis dandy families[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2009, 25(2):10-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2009.02.002.邹寿明, 晏姝, 王润辉, 等. 乐昌含笑家系试验初报[J]. 广东林业科技, 2009, 25(2):10-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2009.02.002.
    [5] ZHANG W H, YAN S, WANG R H, et al. Grafting techniques for plus tree of Michelia chapensis Dandy[J]. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2018(6):147-148. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.06.094.张伟红, 晏姝, 王润辉, 等. 乐昌含笑优树嫁接技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(6):147-148. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2018.06.094.
    [6] LIE Z Y, LI J, ZHOU T T, et al. Density effect on nutrient content and accumulation of Michelia chapensis plantations[J]. Hunan For Sci Technol, 2016, 43(1):44-47,60. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2016. 01.008.列志旸, 李洁, 周彤彤, 等. 密度对乐昌含笑幼苗养分积累的影响[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2016, 43(1):44-47,60. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2016.01.008.
    [7] LIU S Z, XUE K N, KONG G H, et al. Effects of air pollution on the growth of 35 garden plants[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2003, 11(4):329-335. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2003.04.004.刘世忠, 薛克娜, 孔国辉, 等. 大气污染对35种园林植物生长的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2003, 11(4):329-335. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1005-3395.2003.04.004.
    [8] QIU E F, XU F, WANG C, et al. Population distribution and structure characteristics of village roadside forest in Fujian Province, eastern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2012, 34(6):68-74. doi:10.13332/j. 1000-1522.2012.06.023.邱尔发, 许飞, 王成, 等. 福建省乡村道路林种群分布及结构特征研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(6):68-74. doi:10.13332/j. 1000-1522.2012.06.023.
    [9] XUE L, ZHANG R, XI R C, et al. Seasonal change of leaf morpho-logical traits of six broadleaf seedlings in South China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(1):123-134. doi:10.5846/stxb201011291691.薛立, 张柔, 奚如春, 等. 华南地区6种阔叶幼苗叶片形态特征的季节变化[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(1):123-134. doi:10.5846/stxb 201011291691.
    [10] KE J X, CHEN D, GUO Y P. Designing leaf marginal shapes:Regula-tory mechanisms of leaf serration or dissection[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(9):988-997. doi:10.17520/biods.2018127.柯锦秀, 陈多, 郭延平. 植物叶缘形态的发育调控机理[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(9):988-997. doi:10.17520/biods.2018127.
    [11] WANG Y L, WANG W F, ZHANG Y X, et al. Responses of leaf morphological structure and physiological characteristics of Populus euramericana cv. ‘BYu’ to drought stress[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2019, 55(4):42-50. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190405.王怡霖, 王卫锋, 张芸香, 等. 碧玉杨叶形态结构与生理特性对干旱的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4):42-50. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190405.
    [12] YAN D T. Leaf morphological differences of Ulmus macrocarpa (Ulmaceae)[D]. Linfen:Shanxi Normal University, 2017:1-53.闫冬婷. 大果榆叶形态差异研究[D]. 临汾:山西师范大学, 2017:1-53.
    [13] LE L N, HUANG M R, CHEN Y. The research progress on molecular regulation of leaf morphogenesis[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2016, 14(11):3205-3213. doi:10.13271/j.mpb.014.003205.乐丽娜, 黄敏仁, 陈英. 植物叶形态建成的分子机理研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2016, 14(11):3205-3213. doi:10.13271/j.mpb.014. 003205.
    [14] RONG W T, XING F W, YI Q F. Effects of climatic factors on leaf discoloration peak period of 5 species in Macao[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2020, 28(6):574-582. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4232.容文婷, 邢福武, 易绮斐. 澳门5种植物叶变色盛期对气候因子的响应[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(6):574-582. doi:10. 11926/jtsb.4232.
    [15] WANG S, YU Y M, ZHOU Z L, et al. Different clones of Catalpa faygesii Bureau simple leaves morphological characteristics growth dynamic and correlation studies[J]. J Gansu Agric Univ, 2019, 54(5):135-139. doi:10.13432/j.cnki.jgsau.2019.05.017.王桑, 于永明, 周卓玲, 等. 灰楸不同无性系单叶形态特征生长动态及其相关性[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(5):135-139. doi:10.13432/j.cnki.jgsau.2019.05.017.
    [16] HE M H, LIU Z W, CHEN W N. Study on morphology and structure of leaves of Davidia involucrata Bail[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2018, 24(13):94-96. doi:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2018.13.045.何明惠, 刘中伟, 陈文年. 珙桐叶形态结构研究[J]. 安微农学通报, 2018, 24(13):94-96. doi:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2018.13.045.
    [17] CAI X A, RAO X Q, LIU Z F, et al. Effects of shading on leaf morphology, photosynthetic characteristics, and growth of Ilex asprella[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2020, 28(1):25-34. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4077.蔡锡安, 饶兴权, 刘占锋, 等. 遮荫处理对梅叶冬青叶片形态、光合特性和生长的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(1):25-34. doi:10.11926/jtsb.4077.
    [18] ZHANG F Q, LI X Q, PAN W, et al. Cultivation Techniques of Ecological Landscape Trees in Guangdong Province[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Press, 2012:95-97.张方秋, 李小川, 潘文, 等. 广东生态景观树种栽培技术[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2012:95-97.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

梁龙,胡德活,王润辉,郑会全,晏姝,曾碧欣,韦如萍.乐昌含笑不同家系的叶形态与生长差异分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2021,29(5):503~508

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:334
  • 下载次数: 442
  • HTML阅读次数: 337
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-03
  • 最后修改日期:2021-01-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-23
文章二维码