黔中喀斯特9种木质藤本叶功能性状研究
作者:
基金项目:

国家十三五重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0502607);贵州省科技计划重大专项([2017]5411);贵州省世界一流学科建设计划项目([2019]125)资助


Studies on Leaf Functional Traits of Nine Woody Lianas in the Karst Area of Central Guizhou Province
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [46]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为揭示喀斯特生境中藤本植物的生态策略,对中国科学院普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站的陈旗流域中9种木质藤本的叶片功能性状及其相关性进行了研究。结果表明,叶面积、叶厚度、叶绿素含量、比叶面积、叶组织密度和叶干物质含量6个叶功能性状均存在不同程度的变异,性状的种间变异为9.24%~98.18%,种内变异为0.64%~39.71%。落叶植物性状的种内变异系数低于常绿植物;相较于喀斯特乔灌木,藤本植物具有较低的叶厚度、叶组织密度和较高的叶面积、叶干物质含量;藤本植物叶功能性状间关系紧密,比叶面积与叶组织密度、叶干物质含量呈极显著负相关,叶组织密度与叶干物质含量呈极显著正相关。叶绿素含量与叶干物质含量呈极显著负相关。叶厚度与叶绿素含量呈显著正相关,与叶组织密度呈显著负相关。除叶厚度外,叶面积与其余性状均存在显著或极显著相关性。结合叶经济谱理论分析,刺葡萄(Vitis davidii var. davidii)、野葛(Pueraria montana)和野葡萄(V. amurensis)倾向于“快速偿还”型,白木通(Akebia trifoliata)、红毛悬钩子(Rubus pinfaensis)、小果蔷薇(Rosa cymosa)和崖豆藤(Millettia extensa)倾向于“慢速偿还”型,插田泡(Rubus coreanus)和勾儿茶(Berchemia polyphylla)的功能分异明显,介于两者之间。可见,为适应干旱贫瘠的喀斯特环境,藤本植物通过权衡叶功能性状关系来采取不同的适应策略。

    Abstract:

    In order to reveal the ecological strategies of lianas in karst habitats, the leaf function traits and their relationships of nine woody lianas in Chenqi watershed of the Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Chinese Academy of Sciences were studied. The results showed that six leaf functional traits, such as leaf area, leaf thickness, chlorophyll content, specific leaf area, leaf tissue density and leaf dry matter content, had varied in different degrees. The interspecific variation of traits ranged from 9.24% to 98.18%, while intraspecific variation from 0.64% to 39.71%. The intraspecific coefficient of variation of traits in deciduous plant was lower than that in evergreen plants. Compared with leaves of karst trees and shrubs, lianas had lower thickness, tissue density and higher area and dry matter content. There was close relationship among leaf functional traits in lianas. Specific leaf area had significant negative correlation with leaf tissue density and leaf dry matter content, and leaf tissue density had significant positive correlation with leaf dry matter content. Chlorophyll content had significant negative correlation with leaf dry matter content. Leaf thickness had significant positive correlation with chlorophyll content, and significant negative correlation with leaf tissue density. Except for leaf thickness, leaf area had significant correlation with other traits. Combined the leaf economic spectrum theory analysis, Vitis davidii var. davidii, Pueraria montana, and V. amurensis belonged to "quick-return type", and Akebia trifoliata and Rubus pinfaensis, Rosa cymosa and Millettia extensa belonged to "slow-return type". The functional differentiation of Rubus coreanus and Berchemia polyphylla was obvious, fall in between. Therefore, it was suggested that lianas adopt different adaptation strategies by weighing the relationship among leaf functional traits in order to adapt to the arid and barren karst environment.

    参考文献
    [1] SCHNITZER S A, BONGERS F. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests[J]. Trend Ecol Evol, 2002, 17(5):223-230. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02491-6.
    [2] NABE-NIELSEN J. Diversity and distribution of lianas in a neotro-pical rain forest, Yasuni National Park, Ecuador[J]. J Trop Ecol, 2001, 17(1):1-19. doi:10.1017/S0266467401001018.
    [3] JIANG H, ZHOU G Y, HUANG Y H, et al. Photosynthetic characteri-stics of canopy-dwelling vines in lower subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest and response to environmental factors[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(5):567-576. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00567.江浩, 周国逸, 黄钰辉, 等. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林林冠不同部位藤本植物的光合生理特征及其对环境因子的适应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5):567-576. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00567.
    [4] MENG T T, NI J, WANG G H. Plant functional traits, environments and ecosystem functioning[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(1):150-165. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0019.孟婷婷, 倪健, 王国宏. 植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(1):150-165. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0019.
    [5] Gonzalez-Paleo L, Ravetta D A. Relationship between photo-synthetic rate, water use and leaf structure in desert annual and peren-nial forbs differing in their growth[J]. Photosynthetica, 2018, 56(4):1177-1187. doi:10.1007/s11099-018-0810-z.
    [6] JIN Y, WANG C K. Trade-offs between plant leaf hydraulic and economic traits[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(10):1021-1032. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0099.金鹰, 王传宽. 植物叶片水力与经济性状权衡关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10):1021-1032. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015. 0099.
    [7] ZHAO H Y, LI Y L, WANG X Y, et al. Variations in leaf traits of 52 plants in Horqin Sand Land[J]. J Desert Res, 2010, 30(6):1292-1298.赵红洋, 李玉霖, 王新源, 等. 科尔沁沙地52种植物叶片性状变异特征研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(6):1292-1298.
    [8] REICH P B, WALTERS M B, ELLSWORTH D S, et al. Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span:A test across biomes and functional groups[J]. Oecologia, 1998, 114(4):471-482. doi:10.1007/s004420050471.
    [9] READ Q D, MOORHEAD L C, SWENSON N G, et al. Convergent effects of elevation on functional leaf traits within and among species[J]. Funct Ecol, 2014, 28(1):37-45. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12162.
    [10] Swenson N G. The functional ecology and diversity of tropical tree assemblages through space and time:from local to regional and from traits to transcriptomes[J]. Int Sch Res Not, 2012, 2012:743617. doi:10.5402/2012/743617.
    [11] OSNAS J L D, LICHSTEIN J W, Reich P B, et al. Global leaf trait relationships:Mass, area, and the leaf economics spectrum[J]. Science, 2013, 340(6133):741-744. doi:10.1126/science.1231574.
    [12] Diaz S, Hodgson J G, Thompson K, et al. The plant traits that drive ecosystems:Evidence from three continents[J]. J Veg Sci, 2004, 15(3):295-304. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02266.x.
    [13] TANG Q Q, HUANG Y T, DING Y, et al. Interspecific and intra-specific variation in functional traits of subtropical evergreen and deci-duous broad-leaved mixed forests[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(3):262-270. doi:10.17520/biods.2015200.唐青青, 黄永涛, 丁易, 等. 亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林植物功能性状的种间和种内变异[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(3):262-270. doi:10.17520/biods.2015200.
    [14] GUO Z W, ZHAO W X, LUO J F, et al. The variation characteristics of plant functional traits among 16 woody plants in subtropical broad-leaved forest at Dagang Mountain[J]. J Fujian Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2019, 35(1):82-87. doi:10.12046/j.issn.1000-5277.2019.01.012.郭志文, 赵文霞, 罗久富, 等. 大岗山亚热带常绿阔叶林16种木本植物功能性状的变异特征[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(1):82-87. doi:10.12046/j.issn.1000-5277.2019.01.012.
    [15] Albert C H, Thuiller W, Yoccoz N G, et al. Intraspecific functional variability:Extent, structure and sources of variation[J]. J Ecol, 2010, 98(3):604-613. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01651.x.
    [16] LI X K, SU Z M, LÜ S H, et al. The spatial pattern of natural vegetation in the karst regions of Guangxi and the ecological signality for ecosystem rehabilitation and reconstruction[J]. J Mount Sci, 2003, 21(2):129-139. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2003.02.001.李先琨, 苏宗明, 吕仕洪, 等. 广西岩溶植被自然分布规律及对岩溶生态恢复重建的意义[J]. 山地学报, 2003, 21(2):129-139. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2003.02.001.
    [17] WANG D, GOU G Q, SUN Q L, et al. Diversity and exploitation of the wild woody vines resources in Qiannan, Guizhou[J]. Pratacult Sci, 2017, 34(7):1506-1515. doi:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0507.王灯, 苟光前, 孙巧玲, 等. 贵州黔南野生木质藤本植物资源多样性及开发利用[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(7):1506-1515. doi:10.11829/j. issn.1001-0629.2016-0507.
    [18] WANG Y S, CHEN L J, LI Y H, et al. Analysis of species composition and attribute characteristics of related traits of lianas growing in the karst areas of south China[J]. Pratacult Sci, 2020, 37(1):126-138. doi:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0269.王业社, 陈立军, 黎颖惠, 等. 中国南方喀斯特地区藤本植物物种组成及其相关性状属性特征分析[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(1):126-138. doi:10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0269.
    [19] YUAN X X, LIU R H, PAN Y F, et al. Comparative study on func-tional traits of trees and shrubs in different slope aspects on karst hills of Guilin[J]. J Guangxi Acad Sci, 2019, 35(4):253-261. doi:10. 13657/j.cnki.gxkxyxb.20191129.005.苑晓霞, 刘润红, 盘远方, 等. 桂林喀斯特石山不同坡向乔灌木功能性状对比研究[J]. 广西科学院学报, 2019, 35(4):253-261. doi:10.13657/j.cnki.gxkxyxb.20191129.005.
    [20] ZHOU J L, DENG P Y, WU Y X. Study on the drought resistance of three liana species in their seedling stages[J]. Guizhou For Sci Technol, 2015, 43(2):23-28.周杰良, 邓沛怡, 吴易雄. 3种重度石漠化区生态修复藤本植物苗期抗旱性分析[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2015, 43(2):23-28.
    [21] Cornelissen J H C, Lavorel S, Garnier E, et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Aust J Bot, 2003, 51(4):335-380. doi:10.1071/BT02124.
    [22] ZHONG Q L, LIU L B, XU X, et al. Variations of plant functional traits and adaptive strategy of woody species in a karst forest of central Guizhou Province, southwestern China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(5):562-572. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2017.0270.钟巧连, 刘立斌, 许鑫, 等. 黔中喀斯特木本植物功能性状变异及其适应策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5):562-572. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2017.0270.
    [23] CHEN W, WANG J H, MA R J, et al. Variance in leaf functional traits of 89 species from the eastern Guangdong of China[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2016, 35(8):2101-2109. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201608.033.陈文, 王桔红, 马瑞君, 等. 粤东89种常见植物叶功能性状变异特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(8):2101-2109. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201608.033.
    [24] ZHAI S H, WANG P, SHENG L X. Phenotypic plasticity of plant functional traits in competition environments[J]. J Beihua Univ (Nat Sci), 2017, 18(4):538-546. doi:10.11713/j.issn.1009-4822.2017.04.026.翟偲涵, 王平, 盛连喜. 竞争条件下植物功能性状的表型可塑性研究进展[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 18(4):538-546. doi:10.11713/j.issn.1009-4822.2017.04.026.
    [25] LUO D H, XIA J, YUAN J W, et al. Root biomass of karst vegetation in a mountainous area of southwestern China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(5):611-618. doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.015.罗东辉, 夏婧, 袁婧薇, 等. 我国西南山地喀斯特植被的根系生物量初探[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5):611-618. doi:10.3773/j.issn. 1005-264x.2010.05.015.
    [26] ZHAO Y Y, ZHOU Y C, DUAN X. Anti-erodibility and anti-scour-ability of different lithological soils in karst area of central Guizhou Province[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2007, 35(29):9311-9313,9317. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2007.29.090.赵洋毅, 周运超, 段旭. 黔中喀斯特地区不同岩性土壤的抗蚀抗冲性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(29):9311-9313,9317. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2007.29.090.
    [27] CHEN Y J, CHEN J W, CAI Z Q. Lianas and their functions in tropical forests[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2007, 24(2):240-249. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1674-3466.2007.02.017.陈亚军, 陈军文, 蔡志全. 木质藤本及其在热带森林中的生态学功能[J]. 植物学通报, 2007, 24(2):240-249. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2007.02.017.
    [28] KITAJIMA K. Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allo-cation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees[J]. Oecologia, 1994, 98(3/4):419-428. doi:10.1007/BF00324232.
    [29] MCDOWELL N, POCKMAN W T, ALLEN C D, et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought:Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?[J]. New Phytol, 2008, 178(4):719-739. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x.
    [30] ZHANG J L, POORTER L, CAO K F. Productive leaf functional traits of Chinese savanna species[J]. Plant Ecol, 2012, 213(9):1449-1460. doi:10.1007/s11258-012-0103-8.
    [31] DING L Z, CHEN Y J, ZHANG J L. Leaf traits and their associations among liana species in tropical rainforest[J]. Plant Sci J, 2014, 32(4):362-370. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.40362.丁凌子, 陈亚军, 张教林. 热带雨林木质藤本植物叶片性状及其关联[J]. 植物科学学报, 2014, 32(4):362-370. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142. 2014.40362.
    [32] ZHANG X F, MU Z B, LIN M J, et al. Functional traits of leaves of four dominant plants on Langqi Island, Fuzhou, and factors influencing these traits[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2020, 26(3):667-673. doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2019.07058.张秀芳, 穆振北, 林美娇, 等. 琅岐岛4种优势植物叶功能性状及其影响因子[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2020, 26(3):667-673. doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2019.07058.
    [33] PANG S L, OU Z Y, SHEN W H, et al. Leaf function traits variations and adaptive strategies of major woody economic plants in karst area of southwest Guangxi[J/OL]. (2020-07-01). doi:10.11931/guihaia. gxzw202002005.庞世龙, 欧芷阳, 申文辉, 等. 桂西南喀斯特地区主要木本经济植物叶功能性状变异及其适应策略[J/OL]. (2020-07-01). doi:10. 11931/guihaia.gxzw202002005.
    [34] HOU H, LIU H, HE P C, et al. Different leaf construction strategies in evergreen and deciduous species of Magnoliaceae[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2019, 27(3):272-278. doi:10.11926/jtsb.3978.侯皓, 刘慧, 贺鹏程, 等. 木兰科常绿与落叶物种叶片构建策略的差异[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2019, 27(3):272-278. doi:10. 11926/jtsb.3978.
    [35] ZHU J Y, YU Q, LIU Y P, et al. Response of plant functional traits and leaf economics spectrum to urban thermal environment[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(9):72-81. doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180132.朱济友, 于强, 刘亚培, 等. 植物功能性状及其叶经济谱对城市热环境的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(9):72-81. doi:10. 13332/j.1000-1522.20180132.
    [36] SONG J, LI R H, ZHU S D, et al. Leaf functional traits of ferns from different habitats in monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Dinghu-shan Mountain[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2013, 21(6):489-495. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2013.06.001.宋娟, 李荣华, 朱师丹, 等. 鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林不同生境蕨类植物的叶片功能性状研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2013, 21(6):489-495. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2013.06.001.
    [37] BACELAR E A, MOUTINHO-PEREIRA J M, GONÇALVES B C, et al. Changes in growth, gas exchange, xylem hydraulic properties and water use efficiency of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 60(2):183-192. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.10.003.
    [38] PANG Z Q, LU W L, JIANG L S, et al. Leaf traits of different growing plants in karst area of Shilin, China[J]. Guihaia, 2019, 39(8):1126-1138. doi:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201810009.庞志强, 卢炜丽, 姜丽莎, 等. 滇中喀斯特41种不同生长型植物叶性状研究[J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(8):1126-1138. doi:10.11931/gui haia.gxzw201810009.
    [39] YU H Y, CHEN Y T, XU Z Z, et al. Analysis of relationships among leaf functional traits and economics spectrum of plant species in the desert steppe of Nei Mongol[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(10):1029-1040. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00097.于鸿莹, 陈莹婷, 许振柱, 等. 内蒙古荒漠草原植物叶片功能性状关系及其经济谱分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(10):1029-1040. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00097.
    [40] WANG Y J, YANG Y Z, ZHANG J X, et al. Preliminary identification of drought resistance of Chinese wild Vitis species and its interspecific hybrids[J]. Acta Hort Sin, 2004, 31(6):711-714. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2004.06.001.王跃进, 杨亚州, 张剑侠, 等. 中国葡萄属野生种及其种间F1代抗旱性鉴定初探[J]. 园艺学报, 2004, 31(6):711-714. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2004.06.001.
    [41] CHEN L T. Study on the ecological characteristics of Pueraria lobata[J]. Sci Technol Inno, 2011, 15(20):228. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1328. 2011.20.228.陈丽婷. 葛藤的生态学特性研究[J]. 科学技术创新, 2011, 15(20):228. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1328.2011.20.228.
    [42] SAURA-MAS S, SHIPLEY B, LLORET F. Relationship between post-fire regeneration and leaf economics spectrum in Mediterranean woody species[J]. Funct Ecol, 2009, 23(1):103-110. doi:10.1111/j. 1365-2435.2008.01474.x.
    [43] CHAVES M M, MAROCO J P, PEREIRA J S. Understanding plant responses to drought-from genes to the whole plant[J]. Funct Plant Biol, 2003, 30(3):239-264.
    [44] LIU C C, LIU Y G, GUO K. Ecophysiological adaptations to drought stress of seedlings of four plant species with different growth forms in karst habitats[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(10):1070-1082. doi:10. 3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01070.刘长成, 刘玉国, 郭柯. 四种不同生活型植物幼苗对喀斯特生境干旱的生理生态适应性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10):1070-1082. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01070.
    [45] YIN X L, WEN J, LIU X, et al. Study on leaf stoma density of 12 representative genus of Rosaceae family[J]. N Fruit, 2008, 31(1):4-6. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5698.2008.01.002.尹秀玲, 温静, 刘欣, 等. 蔷薇科12属代表植物叶片气孔密度研究[J]. 北方果树, 2008, 31(1):4-6. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5698.2008. 01.002.
    [46] LIU J Y, FU P L, WANG Y J, et al. Different drought-adaptation strategies as characterized by hydraulic and water-relations traits of evergreen and deciduous figs in a tropical karst forest[J]. Plant Sci J, 2012, 30(5):484-493. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50484.刘金玉, 付培立, 王玉杰, 等. 热带喀斯特森林常绿和落叶榕树的水力特征和水分关系与抗旱策略[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(5):484-493. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50484.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王梦洁,容丽,李婷婷,王琪,叶天木.黔中喀斯特9种木质藤本叶功能性状研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2021,29(5):455~464

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:578
  • 下载次数: 550
  • HTML阅读次数: 835
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-02
  • 最后修改日期:2021-03-12
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-23
文章二维码