首页 > 过刊浏览>2021年第29卷第4期 >421-429. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4301
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
成都地区19个木芙蓉品种的孢粉学研究及其分类学意义
作者:
基金项目:

四川省重点研发项目（2020YFN0004）；成都市公园城市建设管理局产业专项基金（2019MFR0826）资助


Pollen Morphology of 19 Cultivars of Hibiscus mutabilis in Chengdu and Its Taxonomic Significance
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [28]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解成都地区木芙蓉（Hibiscus mutabilis）品种间的亲缘关系，采用扫描电镜观察了19个木芙蓉品种的花粉显微结构，并探讨其分类学意义。结果表明，19个木芙蓉品种的花粉均为大粒，主要为圆球形，具散孔，外壁纹饰均为刺状纹饰，表面具有颗粒状突起。木芙蓉品种间在花粉粒大小、外壁纹饰上具有一定差异，可以作为品种分类的重要依据。聚类分析可以将19个木芙蓉品种划分为3大类，类型I和II的花粉较大，刺细尖；类型III的花粉较小，刺短粗，刺间距离较小。这为木芙蓉品种间亲缘关系研究和品种分类提供了孢粉学依据，也为新品种的选育提供了理论参考。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the relationship among Hibiscus mutabilis cultivars, the pollen morphology of 19 cultivars were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and its taxonomy significance was discussed. The results showed that pollen grains of 19 cultivars were usually large and spherical with spine and pantoporate, and granular protrusions on surface. There were differences in pollen grain size and exine pattern among cultivars, which could be used as an important basis for identification of cultivars. The cluster analysis indicated that the 19 cultivars could be divided into 3 types, the pollen grains of type I and II were large with fine tip spines, and those of type III were small with stubby spines and short distance between spines. Therefore, these would provide palynological basis for the studies on the relationship and the classification among H. mutabilis varieties, and also provide a theoretical reference for the breeding of new varieties.

    参考文献
    [1] XIONG Y Y. Cultural implication interpretation and design practice of hibiscus decoration[D]. Chengdu:Sichuan Normal University, 2019:1-3.熊玉颖. 芙蓉纹饰的文化寓意解读及设计实践[D]. 成都:四川师范大学, 2019:1-3.
    [2] XU C Y, HOU Y X, LI X H, et al. Pollen morphological variation of Primula merrilliana and its systematic significance[J]. Flora, 2019, 253:43-48. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2019.03.010.
    [3] XIE Y Q. Analysis of pollen morphological difference and relationship of Camellia meiocarpa native varieties[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci), 2016, 40(3):26-32. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.005.谢一青. 小果油茶农家品种花粉形态及亲缘关系分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(3):26-32. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1000-2006.2016.03.005.
    [4] WANG D J, WANG K, GAO Y, et al. Study on the Pollen Morphology, Taxonomy and clustering of the local varieties of apples[J]. J Plant Gene Resour, 2016, 17(1):84-91. doi:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.01.013.王大江, 王昆, 高源, 等. 苹果地方品种花粉形态分类及聚类研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(1):84-91. doi:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr. 2016.01.013.
    [5] CHEN J Y. Taxonomy of Chinese Flower Varieties[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Press, 2001:7.陈俊愉. 中国花卉品种分类学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2001:7.
    [6] YANG Q S, WAN H M, SUN J Y, et al. Comparison of pollen morphology of tree peony cultivar groups[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2010, 46(6):133-137. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100621.杨秋生, 万卉敏, 孙俊娅, 等. 牡丹栽培品种群花粉形态的比较[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(6):133-137. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100621.
    [7] ZHANG S W, JIA W Q, ZHANG H L, et al. Pollen morphology and germination rate of 13 peony varieties[J]. J NE For Univ, 2017, 45(10):20-23. doi:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.10.006.张少伟, 贾文庆, 张红兰, 等. 13个牡丹品种花粉形态及萌发率比较[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(10):20-23. doi:10.13759/j. cnki.dlxb.2017.10.006.
    [8] PENG X Y, ZHAO L Q, MAO J M, et al. Flowering phenology and changes in pollen activity and stigma receptivity during blossom process of single inflorescence of Salix viminalis in Beijing[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2017, 26(1):110-112. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2017.01.16.彭向永,赵利清,毛金梅, 等. 北京地区蒿柳的开花物候期及单花序开放过程中花粉活力和柱头可授性变化[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2017, 26(1):110-112. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2017.01.16.
    [9] LIU J L, LAN S Y, NIE Y C. A study on the morphology and structure of pollen grains of 16 species of Gossypium[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 1987, 20(6):34-38.刘金兰, 兰盛银, 聂以春. 棉属(Gossypium)不同棉种花粉形态和结构研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1987, 20(6):34-38.
    [10] PENG H W, ZHOU S D, HE X J. Pollen morphology of 26 taxa from 15 genera of malvaceae in China and its systematic significance[J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occid Sin, 2018, 38(10):1832-1845. doi:10.7606/j. issn.1000-4025.2018.10.1832.彭焕文, 周颂东, 何兴金. 中国锦葵科15属26个分类群植物花粉形态及其系统学意义[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(10):1832-1845. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2018.10.1832.
    [11] XU Q H. Pollen Morphology of Common Cultivated Plants in China:Reference for Finding Human Traces in Strata[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2015:429-436.许清海. 中国常见栽培植物花粉形态:地层中寻找人类痕迹之借鉴[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2015:429-436.
    [12] CHRISTENSEN P B. Pollen morphological studies in the Malvaceae[J]. Grana, 1986, 25(2):95-117. doi:10.1080/00173138609428890.
    [13] WANG K F, WANG X Z. Introduction to Palynology[M]. Beijing:Beijing University Press, 1983:21-34.王开发, 王宪曾. 孢粉学概论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 1983:21-34.
    [14] WROŃSKA-PILAREK D, DANIELEWICZ W, BOCIANOWSKI J, et al. Comparative pollen morphological analysis and its systematic implications on three European Oak (Quercus L., Fagaceae) species and their spontaneous hybrids[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(8):e0161762. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161762.
    [15] DA COSTA M, André L, MEZZONATO-PIRES A C, et al. Pollen morphology in the genus Bonamia Thouars (Convolvulaceae) and its taxonomic significance[J]. Rev Palaeobot Palynol, 2019, 264:11-23. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.02.008.
    [16] ZHANG X H, DA SILVA J A T, DUAN J, et al. Pollen morphology of Magnolioideae in China and its taxonomic implications[J]. Sci Hort, 2014, 176:170-179. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.009.
    [17] WANG Y X, CHEN B H, WANG S H, et al. SEM observation on the pollen morphology of eleven ornamental crabapple varieties[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2014, 34(6):751-757. doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.06.006.王延秀, 陈佰鸿, 王淑华, 等. 11个观赏海棠品种花粉形态扫描电镜观察[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(6):751-757. doi:10.7525/j.issn. 1673-5102.2014.06.006.
    [18] LIU X L, CHEN J J, WANG C Y. The research on pollen morphology and numerical taxonomy of 37Yulania varieties[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2018, 16(7):2389-2400. doi:10.13271/j.mpb.016.002389.刘秀丽, 陈金金, 王晨宇. 37个玉兰品种的花粉形态及数量分类研究[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(7):2389-2400. doi:10.13271/j.mpb. 016.002389.
    [19] CHANG Y H, TIAN X L, ZHANG C Q, et al. Problems and thoughts on the classification of Rhododendron cultivars in China[J]. World For Res, 2020, 33(1):60-65. doi:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2019.0086.y.常宇航, 田晓玲, 张长芹, 等. 中国杜鹃花品种分类问题与思考[J]. 世界林业研究, 2020, 33(1):60-65. doi:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2019.0086.y.
    [20] ZHU K, ZHANG L, CHEN Y J, et al. Pollen morphology and resulting taxonomic implications of 37 cultivars of Poa L.[J]. Acta Agrest Sin, 2011, 19(1):114-121. doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.01.020.朱琨, 张璐, 陈雅君, 等. 37个早熟禾品种的花粉形态及其分类学意义[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(1):114-121. doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.01.020.
    [21] DAJOZ I, TILL-BOTTRAUD I, GOUYON P H. Pollen aperture polymorphism and gametophyte performance in Viola diversifolia[J]. Evolution, 1993, 47(4):1080-1093. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb 02137.x.
    [22] KARABOURNIOTI S, ELEFTHERIOU E P, THRASYVOULOU A, et al. Pollen polymorphism in Thymus capitatus (Lamiaceae)[J]. Can J Bot, 2007, 85(5):493-500. doi:10.1139/B07-048.
    [23] BIAN X M, MU H L, MA Y L, et al. Pollen morphology of natural Primula maximowicizii populations[J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2016, 17(2):257-265. doi:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.02.010.边晓萌, 穆绘莉, 马玉磊, 等. 胭脂花野生居群花粉形态多样性研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(2):257-265. doi:10.13430/j. cnki.jpgr.2016.02.010.
    [24] ZHOU Q, XU S X, WANG Z. Study on the pollen morphology of 42 varieties of Bougainvillea[J]. J Agric, 2020, 10(5):48-57. doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190600078.周群, 徐夙侠, 王振. 42个三角梅品种的花粉形态比较分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(5):48-57. doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190600078.
    [25] SUN Y, DING S Q, SHI Y M, et al. Pollen morphology of 15 cultivars of Freesia hybrida[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2019, 39(1):17-26. doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.01.003.孙忆, 丁苏芹, 史益敏, 等. 15个小苍兰品种的花粉形态研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(1):17-26. doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.01.003.
    [26] ZHOU J W, WU X M, ZHOU H J, et al. Observation of pollen grains of ten hydrangea varieties with scanning electron microscope (SEM)[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed, 2020. (2020-08-21) https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20200821.1233.007.html.周静伟, 吴晓梦, 周慧晶, 等. 10个八仙花品种花粉粒形态扫描电镜观察[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2020. (2020-08-21) https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20200821.1233.007.html.
    [27] ZHAO Y X, FENG Q, TIAN L, et al. Pollen morphology and nume-rical taxonomy of 22Hibiscus syriacus[J]. Guihaia, 2021, 41(1):103-113. doi:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201911037.赵艺璇, 冯琪, 田琳, 等. 22个木槿品种花粉形态与分类研究[J]. 广西植物, 2021, 41(1):103-113. doi:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201911037.
    [28] WU H X, LIU L T, LIAO B Y, et al. Pollen morphology and resuting taxonomic implications of 20Eucalyptus species and progenies[J]. J CS Univ For Technol, 2012, 32(3):29-36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2012.03.006.武海霞, 刘丽婷, 廖柏勇, 等. 20种桉树及杂交种的花粉形态分析及分类学意义[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(3):29-36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2012.03.006.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张璐,张曼瑜,曾心美,贾茵,姜贝贝,周蛟,马娇,徐倩,石小庆,王凯璐,潘远智.成都地区19个木芙蓉品种的孢粉学研究及其分类学意义[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2021,29(4):421~429

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1785
  • 下载次数: 647
  • HTML阅读次数: 620
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-03
  • 最后修改日期:2020-11-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-28
文章二维码
您是第16715500 位访问者
主管单位：中国科学院
主办单位：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
地址：广州市天河区兴科路723号 中国科学院华南植物园 《热带亚热带植物学报》编辑部
电话：86 (0)20-3725 2514
热带亚热带植物学报 ® 2025 版权所有