茂兰喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群落组成和优势种更新类型
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31660107);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合平台人才[2017]5726号);贵州省自然科学基金项目(2012-2280)资助


Community Composition and Regeneration Types of Dominant Species in Evergreen and Deciduous Broad-leaved Mixed Karst Forest in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [26]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探讨茂兰喀斯特森林群落结构和优势种更新机制,对茂兰自然保护区常绿落叶阔叶混交林群落进行了调查。结果表明,群落中有木本植物37科58属70种,以樟科、蔷薇科、无患子科和漆树科为主。常绿树种41种,占总种数的58.6%;落叶树种29种,占总种数的41.4%,这体现了喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林的群落学性质。群落的优势乔木树种有轮叶木姜子(Litsea verticillata)、青冈栎(Cyclobalanopsis glauca)、狭叶润楠(Machilus rehderi)和翅荚香槐(Cladrastis platycarpa)等。灌木优势种有皱叶海桐(Pittosporum crispulum)、裂果卫矛(Euonymus dielsianus)、革叶铁榄(Sinosideroxylon wightianum)和南天竹(Nandina domestica)等。优势种种群结构有5种类型:单峰型,如樱桃(Cerasus pseudocerasus)、南酸枣(Choerospondias axillaris)等阳性乔木,为林窗更新种,随林窗的郁闭将衰退消失;逆J字型,如轮叶木姜子、香港四照花(Dendrobenthamia hongkongensis)、皱叶海桐等耐荫性强的常绿阔叶树种,更新能力较强,为顶极群落优势种;间歇型,如青冈栎、狭叶润楠、齿叶黄皮(Clausena dunniana)等树种,群落中的个体多集中在小径级阶段,能长期存在于群落中;L字型,如桂皮(Cinnamomum tamala)、梓叶槭(Acer catalpifolium)、革叶铁榄等;单柱型,如石岩枫(Mallotus repandus)、南天竹等常绿灌木树种,个体集中于幼苗、幼树阶段,为顶极群落亚乔木层和灌木层的主要组成种。因此,这表明调查区域的植物群落处于相对稳定的顶极阶段。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the structure and regeneration mechanism of dominant species in community, the evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed karst forests in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province, were investigated. The results showed that there were 70 woody species, belonging to 37 families and 58 genera in the community. The dominant families were Lauraceae, Rosaceae, Sapindaceae and Aceraceae. There were 41 evergreen trees and 29 deciduous trees, accounting for 58.6% and 41.4% of the total species, respectively, which indicated the character of evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed karst forests. The dominant trees in community were Litsea verticillata, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Machilus rehderi and Cladrastis platycarpa, etc., while dominant shrub were Pittosporum crispulum, Euonymus dielsianus, Sinosideroxylon wightianum and Nandina domestica, etc. Based on DBH class distribution pattern, the dominant species community structure could be divided into five types. The unimodal type species, such as heliophyte Cerasus pseudocerasus and Choerospondias axillaris, regenerate in gap, which would disappear finally with the gap closing. The inverse-J type species, such as evergreen broad-leaved trees Litsea verticillata, Dendrobenthamia hongkongensis, Pittosporum crispulum, were dominant species in climax community with strong shade tolerance and renewability. The sporadic type species, such as Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Machilus rehderi, Clausena dunniana, main in small DBH class, can exist in the community for a long time. The L type species, such as Cinnamomum tamala, Acer catalpifolium, Sinosideroxylon wightianum, and the unibar type species, such as Mallotus repandus, Nandina domestica, were the dominant species in subtree layer and shrub layer of the climax community. Therefore, the karst forest community in Maolan is in a relatively stable climax stage.

    参考文献
    [1] DA L J, YANG Y C, SONG Y C. Population structure and regeneration types of dominant species in an evergreen broadleaved forest in Tian-tong National Forest Park, Zhejiang Province, eastern China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2004, 28(3):376-384. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2004.0054. 达良俊, 杨永川, 宋永昌. 浙江天童国家森林公园常绿阔叶林主要组成种的种群结构及更新类型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(3):376-384. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2004.0054.
    [2] HUANG Y T, YAO L, AI X R, et al. Quantitative classification of the subtropical evergreen-deciduous broadleaved mixed forest and the deciduous and evergreen species composition structure across two national nature reserves in the southwest of Hubei, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(10):990-1002. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0096. 黄永涛, 姚兰, 艾训儒, 等. 鄂西南两个自然保护区亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林类型及其常绿和落叶物种组成结构分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10):990-1002. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0096.
    [3] ZHENG Y W. Introduction to Mulun Karst Forest Region[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1999:15-19. 郑颖吾. 木论喀斯特林区概论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1999:15-19.
    [4] LAN S A, SONG M, ZENG F P, et al. Species composition of woody plants in evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved karst forests, southwest China[J]. Guihaia, 2016, 36(10):1156-1164. doi:10.11931/guihaia. Gxzw201606018. 兰斯安, 宋敏, 曾馥平, 等. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林木本植物组成特征[J]. 广西植物, 2016, 36(10):1156-1164. doi:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201606018.
    [5] LI Y B, WANG S J, ZHOU D Q. Research on the ecosystem service evaluation of Maolan karst forest[J]. Earth Environ, 2005, 33(2):39-44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9250.2005.02.006. 李阳兵, 王世杰, 周德全. 茂兰岩溶森林的生态服务研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2005, 33(2):39-44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9250.2005.02.006.
    [6] ZHANG Z X, LIU P, LIU C S, et al. The structure characteristics and dominant population regeneration types of Tsuga tchekiangensis commu-nities in the Jiulongshan National Natural Reserve of Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2008, 28(9):4547-4558. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933. 2008.09.057. 张志祥, 刘鹏, 刘春生, 等. 浙江九龙山南方铁杉(Tsuga tchekiang-ensis)群落结构及优势种群更新类型[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(9):4547-4558. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.09.057.
    [7] QIU Z J, LIU P, LIU C S, et al. Community structure and regeneration types of dominant species in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in Mount Beishan of Jinhua, China[J]. Guihaia, 2010, 30(5):629-635. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2010.05.010. 邱志军, 刘鹏, 刘春生, 等. 金华北山常绿阔叶林群落结构及优势乔木树种更新类型[J]. 广西植物, 2010, 30(5):629-635. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2010.05.010.
    [8] YI H, DENG X W, XIANG W H, et al. The characteristics and regeneration of the Choerospondias axillaries broad-leaved community in the hilly region of central Hunan Province, China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34(12):3463-3471. doi:10.5846/stxb201309302403. 易好, 邓湘雯, 项文化, 等. 湘中丘陵区南酸枣阔叶林群落特征及群落更新[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12):3463-3471. doi:10.5846/stxb 201309302403.
    [9] XIONG X G, XIONG G M, XIE Z Q. The regeneration of tree species in the mixed evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved forests in the Shennong-jia Mountains, Hubei Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2002, 22(11):2001-2005. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.11.029. 熊小刚, 熊高明, 谢宗强. 神农架地区常绿落叶阔叶混交林树种更新研究[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(11):2001-2005. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.11.029.
    [10] KANG B, LIU S R, WANG D X, et al. Regeneration characteristics of woody plant seedlings in typical secondary forests in Qinling Mountains[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22(12):3123-3130. doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0438. 康冰, 刘世荣, 王得祥, 等. 秦岭山地典型次生林木本植物幼苗更新特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12):3123-3130. doi:10.13287/j. 1001-9332.2011.0438.
    [11] ZHANG J, GUO X Y, DA L J, et al. Regeneration pattern and limitation of under-story woody plants of artificial forest in Shanghai[J]. J East Chin Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2013, 2013(2):11-19. 张净, 郭雪艳, 达良俊, 等. 上海人工林林下木本植物更新格局[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 2013(2):11-19.
    [12] YAO L, AI X R, YI Y M, et al. Structure and dynamics of dominant populations in the mixed forest of subtropical evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved tree species in the Southwest of Hubei Province[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2017, 53(2):10-18. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170202. 姚兰, 艾训儒, 易咏梅, 等. 鄂西南亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林优势种群的结构与动态特征[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2):10-18. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170202.
    [13] ZHU S Q. Ecological Research on Karst Forest (I)[M]. Guiyang:Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House, 1993:8-10. 朱守谦. 喀斯特森林生态研究(I)[M]. 贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 1993:8-10.
    [14] LIU J M. The reproductive and regenerative countermeasures of the main woody species in Maolan karst forest[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2000, 36(5):114-122. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20000527. 刘济明. 茂兰喀斯特森林主要树种的繁殖更新对策[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(5):114-122. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20000527.
    [15] LONG C L, YU S X, XIONG Z B, et al. Species diversity and regene-ration in forest gaps of the Karst forest in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2005, 13(1):43-50. doi:10. 3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2005.01.006. 龙翠玲, 余世孝, 熊志斌, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林林隙的植物多样性与更新[J]. 生物多样性, 2005, 13(1):43-50. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2005.01.006.
    [16] ZHANG Z H. Ecological research on population and community stability in karst forest vegetation[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2011:41-44. 张忠华. 喀斯特森林植被种群生态学与群落稳定性分析[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2011:41-44.
    [17] LIU J L, ZHOU Y Y, PAN J H, et al. Analyses on community charac-teristics and population structure of Bretschneidera sinensis in Zhejiang Jiulongshan National Natural Reserve[J]. J Plant Res Environ, 2013, 22(3):95-99. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2013.03.15. 刘菊莲, 周莹莹, 潘建华, 等. 浙江九龙山国家级自然保护区伯乐树群落特征及种群结构分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2013, 22(3):95-99. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2013.03.15.
    [18] ZHANG W H, XU X B, ZHOU J Y, et al. Pattern and dynamics of the spatial population distribution of endangered Abies chensiensis[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2005, 25(9):1840-1847. doi:10.3321/j. issn:1000-4025.2005.09.023. 张文辉, 许晓波, 周建云, 等. 濒危植物秦岭冷杉种群空间分布格局及动态[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(9):1840-1847. doi:10.3321/j. issn:1000-4025.2005.09.023.
    [19] WANG X W, SHANG Z H, ZHANG Q, et al. The differences between relative light intensity and yield, quality in two canopy of sweet cherry[J]. Acta Hort Sin, 2009, 36(2):157-162. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2009.02.001. 王小伟, 尚志华, 张强, 等. 樱桃透光和郁闭树冠相对光照强度及其果实品质和产量的差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(2):157-162. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2009.02.001.
    [20] XU X H, YU M J, HU Z H, et al. The structure and dynamics of Castanopsis eyrei population in Gutian Mountain Natural Reserve in Zhejiang, east China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25(3):645-653. doi:10. 3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.03.036. 徐学红, 于明坚, 胡正华, 等. 浙江古田山自然保护区甜槠种群结构与动态[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(3):645-653. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.03.036.
    [21] ZHUGE G, AI J G, ZHAO B, et al. Structure and distribution pattern of dominant populations of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Shiyang forest center[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2007, 27(6):6-9. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2007.06.002. 诸葛刚, 哀建国, 赵斌, 等. 石垟林场常绿阔叶林优势种群结构与分布格局研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2007, 27(6):6-9. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1001-3776.2007.06.002.
    [22] CHEN Q X, LIAO L, ZHENG J, et al. Effects of light intensities on growth and physiological characteristics of potted Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedlings[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2011, 47(12):53-59. doi:10.11707/j. 1001-7488.20111208. 陈秋夏, 廖亮, 郑坚, 等. 光照强度对青冈栎容器苗生长和生理特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(12):53-59. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20111208.
    [23] LIU S, HE Q, LI J Y, et al. Physiological responses of the limestone endemic plant Triadica rotundifolia seedlings to drought stress[J]. J S China Agric Univ, 2016, 37(2):96-100. doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.02.015. 刘珊, 何茜, 李吉跃, 等. 石漠化树种圆叶乌桕对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(2):96-100. doi:10.7671/j. issn.1001-411X.2016.02.015.
    [24] ZHENG Z Y, LONG C L. Interspecific association of woody plant species at different topography sites in Maolan karst forest[J]. For Resour Manag, 2014(4):78-84,91. doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.04.016. 郑振宇, 龙翠玲. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同地形部位木本植物种间联结性分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(4):78-84,91. doi:10.13466/j.cnki. lyzygl.2014.04.016.
    [25] ZHANG Z H, HU G, NI J. Interspecific segregation of old-growth karst forests in Maolan, southwest China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(9):2235-2245. 张忠华, 胡刚, 倪健. 茂兰喀斯特森林群落的种间分离特征[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(9):2235-2245.
    [26] LIU J M, WEN A H, CHI X, et al. Community characteristics of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (Thunb.) Oerst.-Cinnamomum parthenoxylon (Jack.) Meissn in Maolan[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2014, 53(14):3326-3331. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2014.14.029. 刘济明, 文爱华, 池馨, 等. 茂兰青冈栎-黄樟群落特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(14):3326-3331. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2014.14.029.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴邦利,龙翠玲,秦随涛.茂兰喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林群落组成和优势种更新类型[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2018,26(6):651~660

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1471
  • 下载次数: 975
  • HTML阅读次数: 468
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-05
  • 最后修改日期:2018-03-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-11-21
文章二维码