不同样方尺度下鄱阳湖湿地典型草洲植物种间关联性
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81260449);江西省青年科学基金项目(20132BAB214022);江西省教育厅2012年度科技项目(CJJ12185)资助


Species Relationship among Typical Marshland Plants in Poyang Lake Region on Different Sample Scale
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [27]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解群落中优势植物的关联程度和性质随样方尺度的变化,在鄱阳湖湿地典型草洲-南矶湿地国家级自然保护区选取8块样地(大小8 m×8 m,样带间隔100 m,样地间隔80 m),每个样地依次划分为1 m×1 m、2 m×2 m和4 m×4 m等3个样方尺度,利用方差比率法、卡方检验和Jaccard指数检验方法,研究群落优势植物总体关联程度和性质及两两物种对间关联程度和性质随样方尺度扩大的变化。结果表明,该研究区优势物种有灰化薹草(Carex cinerascens)、水田碎米荠(Cardamine lyrata)、蒌蒿(Artemisia selengensis)、通泉草(Mazus japonicus)、菊叶委陵菜(Potentilla tanacetifolia)、南荻(Triarrhena lutarioriparia)和早熟禾(Poa annua)。随样方尺度扩大,物种重要值除灰化薹草先增加后减少以外,其他物种的变化均不显著。7种优势植物组成的21个物种对随样方尺度扩大,植物总体关联性不显著且由负关联转向正关联。在3个样方尺度条件,21个物种对的多呈现不显著关联。随样方尺度的扩大,种间呈显著关联的物种对逐渐减少;种间呈正关联的物种对逐渐增加。Jaccard指数表明,各物种对随样方尺度的扩大,种间关联程度不断增加。这是由于研究区地被植物种类较多,分布频度较低,不同样方尺度下,群落内部资源分布差异以及物种之间的竞争与协同关系所致。

    Abstract:

    In order to understand the changes in species relationship of dominant species with sample scale, a typical wetland in the Poyang Lake region, the Nanji Wetland National Nature Reserve was selected as the study area, three belt transects with spacing interval 100 m were surveyed, which consisting of 2-3 sample plots (8 m×8 m in size) with sample spacing interval 80 m for each transect, eight sample plots in total. Each sample plot was divided into three sample unit scales with spatial sizes of 1 m×1 m, 2 m×2 m and 4 m×4 m. The methods of variance ratio test, χ2 test, Jaccard index were used to measure the change tendency of overall interspecies association and pair interspecies association for the community dominant plants with expansion of the sample unit scales. The results showed that Carex cinerascens, Cardamine lyrata, Artemisia selengensis, Mazus japonicus, Potentilla tanacetifolia, Triarrhena lutarioriparia, and Poa annua were dominant species according impotance value. With increase of sample unit scale, the changes in importance value of dominant species were not significant except of Carex cinerascens, which increased at first and then decreased. According to variance ratio test, there were no significant difference in overall interspecies association for the 21 species pairs from the seven dominant species, and which changed from negative association to positive association with the increment of the sample unit scale. From χ2 test, there was no significant difference in species-species association for most of the 21 species pairs at the three sample unit scales. With enlargement of sample unit sizes, the number of species pairs with significant association dropped down and that with positive association stepped up gradually. According to Jaccard index, the degree of species pair association enhanced continuously with increment of sample unit scales. Therefore, it was caused that there were many plant species with low occurrence frequency, the resources distribution variation within plant communities at different sample scales and the competition/cooperation relations between plant species in the study area.

    参考文献
    [1] YANG Q Q, YANG Z Y, CHEN X H, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Syzygium odoratum in tropical coast[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2017, 53(9):105-113. doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170913. 杨青青, 杨众养, 陈小花, 等. 热带海岸香蒲桃天然次生林群落优势种群种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9):105-113. doi:10. 11707/j.1001-7488.20170913.
    [2] MLIGO C. Diversity and distribution pattern of riparian plant species in the Wami River System, Tanzania[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(2):259-270. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtw021.
    [3] WU C P, YUAN W G, SHENG W X, et al. Spatial distribution patterns and associations of tree species in typical natural secondary forest communities in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(2):1-13. 吴初平, 袁位高, 盛卫星, 等. 浙江省典型天然次生林主要树种空间分布格局及其关联性[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2):1-13.
    [4] KONG Y Y, YU Y W, HOU F J. Interspecific associations in plant communities under yak dung depositions in an alpine meadow[J]. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2017, 26(3):44-52. doi:10.11686/cyxb2016145. 孔杨云, 于应文, 侯扶江. 牦牛粪沉积下高寒草甸植物群落种间关联研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(3):44-52. doi:10.11686/cyxb2016145.
    [5] DAI X L, XIE J P, LU J F, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant species of wetland plant communities in Dunhuang Yangguan Reserve[J]. Chin Agric Bull, 2016, 32(13):118-124. doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15110106. 代雪玲, 谢建平, 逯军峰, 等. 敦煌阳关保护区湿地植物群落优势种种间关系分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(13):118-124. doi:10. 11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15110106.
    [6] FENG W, ZHAO C Z, HAN L, et al. Spatial pattern and spatial asso-ciation of Myricaria bracteata and Tamarix ramosissima in Zhangye Wetland[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2016, 35(10):2583-2591. doi:10.13292/j. 1000-4890.201610.022. 冯威, 赵成章, 韩玲, 等. 张掖湿地宽苞水柏枝和多枝柽柳种群的空间分布格局与关联性分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10):2583-2591. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201610.022.
    [7] WIENS J A. Spatial scaling in ecology[J]. Funct Ecol, 1989, 3(4):385-397. doi:10.2307/2389612.
    [8] ZHANG J T. Quantitative Ecology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:Science Press, 2011. 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 第2版. 北京:科学出版社, 2011.
    [9] JIN Q, WU Q, ZHONG X Z, et al. Soil organic carbon and its com-ponents under different plant communities along a water table gradient in the Poyang Lake Wetland[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(5):1180-1187. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201705.020. 金奇, 吴琴, 钟欣孜, 等. 鄱阳湖湿地水位梯度下不同植物群落类型土壤有机碳组分特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5):1180-1187. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201705.020.
    [10] TAN Z Q, ZHANG Q, LI Y L, et al. Distribution of typical vegetation communities along elevation in Poyang Lake Wetlands[J]. Wetland Sci, 2016, 14(4):506-515. doi:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2016.04.009. 谭志强, 张奇, 李云良, 等. 鄱阳湖湿地典型植物群落沿高程分布特征[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14(4):506-515. doi:10.13248/j.cnki.wet landsci.2016.04.009.
    [11] XU J X, XU L G, JIANG J H, et al. Change of vegetation community structure and the relationship between it and soil nutrients in typical beaches in Poyang Lake area[J]. Wetland Sci, 2013, 11(2):186-191. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5948.2013.02.006. 许加星, 徐力刚, 姜加虎, 等. 鄱阳湖典型洲滩植物群落结构变化及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 湿地科学, 2013, 11(2):186-191. doi:10. 3969/j.issn.1672-5948.2013.02.006.
    [12] DUAN H L, ZHAO A, YAO Z. Species relationship between the plant species in typical marshland in Poyang Lake Region[J]. Wetland Sci, 2017, 15(1):107-113. doi:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2017.01.016. 段后浪, 赵安, 姚忠. 鄱阳湖区典型草洲植物种间关联性研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2017, 15(1):107-113. doi:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci. 2017.01.016.
    [13] ZHANG J. Investigation on the invasive plants in Nanjishan Nature Reserve of Poyang Lake[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2015, 23(4):419-427. doi:10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2015.04.009. 张杰. 鄱阳湖南矶山湿地自然保护区的外来入侵植物调查与分析[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2015, 23(4):419-427. doi:10.11926/j.issn. 1005-3395.2015.04.009.
    [14] DUAN H L, ZHAO A, YAO Z. Analysis of wetland plant-soil relationships and population niches in Chayegang Marshland near Henghu Farm in the Poyang Lake Region during the dry season[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(11):3744-3754. doi:10.5846/stxb201604050614. 段后浪, 赵安, 姚忠. 恒湖农场茶叶港草洲枯水期湿地植物与土壤关系及种群生态位分析[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11):3744-3754. doi:10.5846/stxb201604050614.
    [15] JIAN Z J, LI T Z, GUO Q S, et al. Interspecific association of main plants in the water level fluctuation zone of canyon landform area of the three gorges reservoir[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2016, 36(10):2086-2093. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2016.10.2086. 简尊吉, 李堂中, 郭泉水, 等. 三峡水库峡谷地貌区消落带主要植物种间关联性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36(10):2086-2093. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2016.10.2086.
    [16] CHUN F, ZHAO M L, SAIXIYA L T, et al. Interspecific associations among dominant species in natural colonized plant communities on the Bayinhua Mining Area in Inner Mongolia[J]. China J Grassland, 2017, 39(5):90-95. doi:10.16742/j.zgcdxb.2017-05-13. 春风, 赵萌莉, 赛西亚拉图, 等. 内蒙古巴音华矿区自然定居植物群落优势种种间关系研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(5):90-95. doi:10.16742/j.zgcdxb.2017-05-13.
    [17] XU J S, WANG M, CHAI Y F, et al. Interspecific association of medicinal herbs in Ziwuling Region[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2015, 35(11):2307-2314. doi:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2015.11.2307. 许金石, 王茂, 柴永福, 等. 子午岭地区草本药用植物种间联结性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(11):2307-2314. doi:10.7606/j. issn.1000-4025.2015.11.2307.
    [18] GETZIN S, WIEGAND T, WIEGAND K, et al. Heterogeneity influ-ences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands[J]. J Ecol, 2008, 96(4):807-820. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01377.x.
    [19] KUŽELOVÁ I, CHYTRÝ M. Interspecific associations in phyto-sociological data sets:How do they change between local and regional scale?[J]. Plant Ecol. 2004, 173(2):247-257. doi:10.1023/B:VEGE. 0000029330.38055.8e.
    [20] McNICKLE G G, LAMB E G, LAVENDER M, et al. Checkerboard score-area relationships reveal spatial scales of plant community structure[J/OL]. Oikos, 2017[2017-10-26]. doi:10.1111/oik.4620.
    [21] LIU Y Q, LIU J Z, CHEN Y J, et al. Environmental characteristics and interspecific associations in the lower reaches of the Kongque River[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(8):2706-2718. doi:10.5846/stxb201511302400. 刘亚琦, 刘加珍, 陈永金, 等. 孔雀河下游断流河道的环境特征及物种间关系[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(8):2706-2718. doi:10.5846/stxb201511302400.
    [22] SONG M, YU L, JIANG Y, et al. Nitrogen-controlled intra-and inter-specific competition between Populus purdomii and Salix rehderiana drive primary succession in the Gongga Mountain Glacier Retreat Area[J]. Tree Physiol, 2017, 37(6):799-814. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpx017.
    [23] ZHANG Y, GUO L P, YI X M, et al. Analysis of interspecific asso-ciations among major tree species in three forest communities on the north slope of Changbai Mountain[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(1):106-115. doi:10.5846/stxb201403250548. 张悦, 郭利平, 易雪梅, 等. 长白山北坡3个森林群落主要树种种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(1):106-115. doi:10.5846/stxb 201403250548.
    [24] LI G, ZHU Z H, WANG X A, et al. Interspecific association of trees species in Quercus wutaiensis communities in Ziwu Mountain related to quadrat size[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2008, 27(5):689-696. 李刚, 朱志红, 王孝安, 等. 子午岭辽东栎群落乔木种间联结与取样面积[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(5):689-696.
    [25] DEMALACH N, ZAADY E, WEINER J, et al. Size asymmetry of resource competition and the structure of plant communities[J]. J Ecol, 2016, 104(4):899-910. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12557.
    [26] MADSEN J S, RØDER H L, RUSSEL J, et al. Coexistence facilitates interspecific biofilm formation in complex microbial communities[J]. Environ Microbiol, 2016, 18(8):2565-2574. doi:10.1111/1462-2920. 13335.
    [27] WANG B S, PENG S L. Studies on the measuring techniques of interspecific association of lower-subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests:I. The exploration and the revision on the measuring formulas of interspecific association[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 1985, 9(4):274-285. 王伯荪, 彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究:I. 种间联结测式的探讨与修正[J]. 植物生态学报, 1985, 9(4):274-279.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

段后浪,赵安,姚忠.不同样方尺度下鄱阳湖湿地典型草洲植物种间关联性[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2018,26(5):449~456

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1007
  • 下载次数: 1082
  • HTML阅读次数: 618
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-12
  • 最后修改日期:2018-01-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-18
文章二维码