首页 > 过刊浏览>2012年第20卷第5期 >445-454. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012.05.004
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
甘蔗品种主要性状的基因型与环境及其互作效应分析
作者:
作者单位:

国家甘蔗产业技术研发中心,农业部福建甘蔗生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,国家甘蔗产业技术研发中心

基金项目:

国家现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(CARS-20); 公益性行业科研专项(201003009-2)资助


Genotype, Environment and Their Interactive Effects on Main Traits of Sugarcane Varieties
Author:
Affiliation:

China’s National Research and Development Center for Sugarcane Industry Technolog,The Ministry of agriculture of Fujian Key Laboratory of biological and genetic breeding of sugarcane,China’s National Research and Development Center for Sugarcane Industry Technology

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • |
  • 引证文献
    • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    用AMMI 模型双标图对国家第六轮甘蔗品种区域试验5 个试点的12 个甘蔗品种试验数据进行分析,研究甘蔗区试中不同品种的产量稳定性问题。结果表明,参试品种的6 个产量性状在品种间和地点间差异显著,品种与地点的互作效应差异显著;FN30、YG16 蔗茎产量和含糖量高,稳定性强,属于高产、稳产性较好的品种。AMMI 模型很好地解释了甘蔗品种产量性状的基因型效应、环境效应和GE 互作效应。

    Abstract:

    The yield stability and adaptability of twelve sugarcane lines in five locations at the sixth national regional trials were studied by using AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) biplot method. The results showed that there were significant differences in six yield traits among genotypes and environments, so did the interaction effects between genotype and environment. FN30 and YG16 had high stem yield and sugar content with strong yield stability. However, the overall stability of the two sugarcane lines was not high, which indicated that they should be promoted in a certain region. AMMI model could clearly explain the genotype effect, environment effect and genotype-environment interaction effect on yield trait.

    参考文献
    [1] Chen R K. Theory and Practice in Modern Sugarcane Breeding[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003: 2-12.陈如凯. 现代甘蔗育种理论和实践 [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 2-12.
    [2] Luo J, Zheng X W, Chen R K, et al. Technical Specification ofCrop Variety Trials: Sugarcane NY/T 1784-2009 [S]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2009: 1-8.罗俊, 郑学文, 陈如凯, 等. NY/T 1784-2009农作物品种试验技术规程 甘蔗 [S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009: 1-8.
    [3] Chen R K, Wen S H, Zhang H, et al. Identification of CropVarieties Specification: Sugarcane NY/T 1786-2009 [S]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2009: 1-8.陈如凯, 文尚华, 张华, 等. NY/T 1786-2009 农作物品种鉴定规范 甘蔗 [S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009: 1-8.
    [4] Becker H C, Léon J. Stability analysis in plant breeding [J]. PlantBreed, 1988, 101(1): 1-23.
    [5] Eberhart S A, Russell W A. Stability parameters for comparingvarieties [J]. Crop Sci, 1966, 6(1): 36-40.
    [6] Tai G C C. Genotypic stability analysis and its application topotato regional trials [J]. Crop Sci, 1971, 11(2): 184-190.
    [7] Gauch H G Jr. Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials:AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier,1992: 1-27.
    [8] Zhang Z, Lu C, Xiang Z H. Analysis of variety stability based onAMMI model [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 1998, 24(3): 304-309.张泽, 鲁成, 向仲怀. 基于AMMI模型的品种稳定性分析 [J]. 作物学报, 1998, 24(3): 304-309.
    [9] Crossa J, Fox P N, Pfeiffer W H, et a1. AMMI adjustment forstatistical analysis of an internal wheat yield trial [J]. Theor ApplGenet, 1991, 81(1): 27-37.
    [10] Li Y Y, Feng Z, Zhao L Y. Analysis of stability of flower yield ofrugosa rose cultivars with AMMI Model [J]. Sci Agri Sin, 2008,41(6): 1761-1766.李艳艳, 丰震, 赵兰勇. 用AMMI模型分析玫瑰品种产花量的稳定性 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6): 1761-1766.
    [11] Chang L, Chai S X. Application of AMMI model in the stabilityanalysis of spring wheat in rainfed areas [J]. Acta Ecol Sin,2006, 26(11): 3677-3684.常磊, 柴守玺. AMMI模型在旱地春小麦稳定性分析中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3677-3684.
    [12] Guo T C, Ma D Y, Zhu Y J, et al. Genotype, environment andtheir interactive effects on main quality traits of winter-sownwheat variety [J]. Sci Agri Sin, 2004, 37(7): 948-953.郭天财, 马冬云, 朱云集, 等. 冬播小麦品种主要品质性状的基因型与环境及其互作效应分析 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2004,37(7): 948-953.
    [13] Norton A J, Bennett S J, Hughes M, et al. Determining thephysical properties of flax fibre for industrial applications:The influence of agronomic practice [J]. Ann Appl Biol, 2006,149(1): 15-25.
    [14] Adugna W, Labuschagne M T. Genotype-environmentinteractions and phenotypic stability analyses of linseed inEthiopia [J]. Plant Breed, 2002, 121(1): 66-71.
    [15] Campbell B T, Jones M A. Assessment of genotype×environment interactions for yield and fiber quality in cottonperformance trials [J]. Euphytica, 2005, 144(1/2): 69-78.
    [16] Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System:Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining [M].Beijing: Science Press, 2007: 484-492.
    [17] Li B G, Yan J, He Z H, et al. Analyzing site discrimination incrop regional yield trials by AMMI mode1 [J]. Acta Agron Sin,2004, 30(6): 593-596.李本贵, 阎俊, 何中虎, 等. 用AMMI模型分析作物区域试验中的地点鉴别力 [J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(6): 593-596.
    [18] Zhang Z F, Fu X F, Liu J Q, et al. Yield stability and testingsiterepresentativeness in national regional trials for oat linesbased on GGE-Biplot analysis [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(8):1377-1385.张志芬, 付晓峰, 刘俊青, 等. 用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性 [J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8):1377-1385.
    [19] Yan W K, Sheng Q L, Hu Y G, et al. GGE biplot: An ideal toolfor studying genotype by environment interaction of regionalyield trial data [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2001, 27(1): 21-27.严威凯, 盛庆来, 胡跃高, 等. GGE叠图法──分析品种×环境互作模式的理想方法 [J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(1): 21-27.
    [20] Chen S L, Li Y R, Cheng Z S, et al. GGE biplot analysis ofeffects of planting density on growth and yield components ofhigh oil peanut [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(7): 1328-1335.陈四龙, 李玉荣, 程增书, 等. 用GGE双标图分析种植密度对高油花生生长和产量的影响 [J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(7): 1328-1335.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

罗俊,张华,阙友雄.甘蔗品种主要性状的基因型与环境及其互作效应分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2012,20(5):445~454

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2384
  • 下载次数: 3441
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-04
  • 最后修改日期:2011-12-26
  • 录用日期:2012-03-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-09-26
文章二维码
您是第16717110 位访问者
主管单位：中国科学院
主办单位：中国科学院华南植物园 广东省植物学会
地址：广州市天河区兴科路723号 中国科学院华南植物园 《热带亚热带植物学报》编辑部
电话：86 (0)20-3725 2514
热带亚热带植物学报 ® 2025 版权所有